Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T08:23:52.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The 19th-century Slovak National Movement: Ethos of Plebeian Resistance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2022

Vasil Gluchman*
Affiliation:
Institute of Philosophy, University of Rzeszów, Poland Institute of Ethics and Bioethics, University of Prešov, Slovakia

Abstract

The author studies the 19th-century Slovak National Movement as a manifestation of the ethos of plebeian resistance against the “laws of progress” of the century in question, according to which small ethnic groups and nations were to be assimilated for the sake of the further development of more advanced nations and their cultures. A significant role in the formation of the ethos of plebeian resistance was played by Slovak folk culture, the historical context of Great Moravia, the solidarity and support of other Slavic nations living in the Habsburg monarchy, and, above all, the moral qualities of Slovak patriots. Among the most significant manifestations of this ethos was the codification of Slovak, which contributed to the formation of Slovak national identity and national ideology, the 1848–1849 Slovak Uprising, and the development of the Slovak national movement in the 1860s continuing into the mid-1870s. The aim of the 19th-century Slovak national movement was to achieve an equal position of the Slovak ethnic group among the other nations and ethnic groups living in the Habsburg monarchy, which would give rise to the free development of its creative powers and abilities as well as to the pursuit of ethical, humanistic ideals in the lives of its members.

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for the Study of Nationalities

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ambruš, Jozef. 1956. “Komentáre.” In Ľudovít Štúr, Listy II (1844–1855), edited by Ambruš, Jozef, 323547. Bratislava: VSAV.Google Scholar
Auer, Stefan. 2004. Liberal Nationalism in Central Europe. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bárándy [pseudonym]. 1841. “Magyarismus többféle maniák elleni harczában.” Századunk 4 (92): 716720.Google Scholar
Brock, Peter. 1976. The Slovak National Awakening: An Essay in the Intellectual History of East Central Europe. Toronto & Buffalo: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 2004. Ethnicity without Groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brubaker, Rogers. 1996. Nationalism Reframed: Nationhood and the National Question in the New Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Čapek, Thomas. 1906. The Slovaks of Hungary: Slavs and Panslavism. New York: The Knickerbocker Press.Google Scholar
David, Zdeněk V. 2007. “Johann Gottfried Herder and the Czech National Awakening: A Reassessment.” Carl Beck Papers in Russian & East European Studies 1807: 153.Google Scholar
Dobšinský, Pavol. (1880–1883) 1958. Prostonárodné slovenské povesti, I.III, edited by Pauliny, Eugen. Bratislava: SVKL.Google Scholar
Döbrentei, Gábor. 1828. “A’ Magyar-nyelv.” Felső-Magyarországi Minerva 4 (4): 17361742.Google Scholar
Dohnány, Mikuláš. (1850) 1988. “História povstania slovenského z roku 1848.” In Slovenské povstanie 1848–1849, edited by Kraus, Cyril, 8180. Bratislava: Tatran.Google Scholar
Edvi Illés, Pál. 1838. Első oktatásra szolgáló kézikönyv vagyis a legszükségesebb tudományok összessége, 2nd edition. Budán: A Magyar Királyi Egyetem Betüivel.Google Scholar
Eliáš, Michal. 2003. “Matica slovenská v rokoch 1863–1875.” In Matica slovenská. Dejiny a prítomnosť, edited by Winkler, Tomáš and Eliáš, Michal, 3196. Martin: Matica slovenská.Google Scholar
Franková, Libuša. 2007. “Osvetové a ľudovýchovné snahy slovenských vzdelancov v období národného obrodenia (1780–1848).” Dejiny 2 (2): 148168.Google Scholar
Gluchman, Vasil. 2019. “The Literary Works as a Code of Ethics in Great Moravia.” Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) 9 (3–4): 106118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goszczyńska, Joanna. 2015. Wielkie spory małego narodu. Warszawa: Elipsa.Google Scholar
Grünwald, Béla. 1878. A Felvidék. Budapest: Ráth Mór.Google Scholar
Hamuljak, Martin. (1827) 1969. “Pavlovi Jozefovi Šafárikovi.” In Listy Martina Hamuljaka I . (1924–1833), edited by Maťovčík, Augustín, 9396. Martin: Matica slovenská.Google Scholar
Havlíček Borovský, Karel. (1846) 1900. Politické spisy, díl I., edited by Tobolka, Zdeněk V.. Prague: Jan Laichter.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann G. (1784) 1800. Outlines of a Philosophy of the History of Man, translated by Churchill, T.. London: St. Paul’s Church-Yard.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric J. 1990. Nations and Nationalism since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hodža, Milan. 1920. Československý rozkol. Turčiansky Svätý Martin: náklad vlastný.Google Scholar
Hollý, Ján. (1833) 1985. “Svätopluk.” In Dielo II , 178553. Edited by Ján Štibraný. Bratislava: Tatran.Google Scholar
Hollý, Ján. (1835) 1985. “Cyrilometodiáda.” In Dielo II , 10175. Edited by Ján Štibraný. Bratislava: Tatran.Google Scholar
Horváthová, Marína Oľga. (1893) 1972. “S. H. Vajanskému 6.8.1893 (list č. 44).” In Korešpondencia Svetozára Hurbana Vajanského II. (Výber listov z rokov 18901916), edited by Petrus, Pavol, 6567. Bratislava: SAV.Google Scholar
Hroboň, Samo Bohdan. (1838) 1981. “Bratislavskej spoločnosti.” In Dotyky s múzou. Levočské rukopisné básne a listy Sama Bohdana Hroboňa, edited by Hleba, Edmund, 3839. Prešov: Štátna vedecká knižnica.Google Scholar
Hroch, Miroslav. 1985. Social Preconditions of National Revival in Europe: A Comparative Analysis of the Social Composition of Patriotic Groups among the Smaller European Nations, translated by Fowkes, Ben. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hroch, Miroslav. 1999. Na prahu národní existence. Touha a skutečnost. Prague: Mladá fronta.Google Scholar
Hučko, Ján. 1974. Sociálne zloženie a pôvod slovenskej obrodeneckej inteligencie. Bratislava: Veda.Google Scholar
Hudek, Adam. 2011. “Between Czechs and Hungarians: Constructing the Slovak National Identity from 19th Century to the Present.” History Compass 9 (4): 257268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurban-Vajanský, Svetozár. (1882) 1973. “A tót leány.” In Literárne vzťahy slovensko-maďarské, edited by Chmel, Rudolf, 203207. Martin: Osveta.Google Scholar
Irmei, Ferenc. (1879) 1973. “Slovenský ľud našej vlasti.” In Literárne vzťahy slovensko-maďarské, edited by Chmel, Rudolf, 188191. Martin: Osveta.Google Scholar
Jakubec, Jan. 1893. “Jak jsme oslavili Kollárovo stoleté jubileum.” Naše doba 1 (1): 109120.Google Scholar
Janos, Andrew C. 1982. The Politics of Backwardness in Hungary 1825–1945. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jungmann, Josef. (1836) 1880. “Dopisy Josefa Jungmanna k Janu Kollárovi.” Časopis Musea Království českého 54 (2): 196218.Google Scholar
Jurčišinová, Nadežda. 2018. “Slováci v revolučných rokoch 1848–1849 a východné Slovensko.” Dejiny 13 (2): 92115.Google Scholar
Jurčišinová, Nadežda. 2010. Českoslovanská jednota a Slováci. Kultúrno-spoločenské aktivity spolku. Prešov: FF PU.Google Scholar
Kirschbaum, Stanislav J. 2005. A History of Slovakia: The Struggle for Survival, 2nd ed. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kiss, László. 2009. “A magyarok szlovákokról alkotott képe a reformkorban.” In A közös történelem vitás kérdései. Sporné otázky spoločných dejín. Acta Academiae Paedagogicae Agriensis, Nova series, tom XXXVI, Sectio Historiae, edited by Kiss, László and Nagy, Imrich, 111128. Eger: EKF.Google Scholar
Kollár, Ján. 1831. Nedělnj, Swátečné i přiležitostné Kázne a Řeči. Pesst: Trattner & Karoli.Google Scholar
Kollár, Ján. 1838. Sláwa Bohyně a původ gména Slawůw čili Slawjanův. Pešť: J. M. Trattner-Károlyi.Google Scholar
Kollár, Ján. 1844. Nedělnj, Swátečné i přiležitostné Kázne a Řeči, djl druhý. Budjn: Jan Gyurian & Martin Bagó.Google Scholar
Kollár, Ján, ed. 1846. Hlasowé o potřebě jednoty spisowného jazyka pro Čechy, Morawany a Slowáky. Prague: Kronberger & Řiwnáč.Google Scholar
Kollár, Ján. 1897. “Leben auf den deutschen Hochschulen.” In Deutsche Einflüsse auf die Anfänge der Böhmischen Romantik, edited by Murko, Matthias, 293362. Graz: Styria.Google Scholar
Kollár, Ján. (1824) 1974. Slávy dcera. Bratislava: Tatran.Google Scholar
Kollár, Ján. (1823) 1988. “Předmluva.” In Piesne svetské ľudu slovenského v Uhorsku, 1. diel, edited by Kollár, Ján and Šafárik, Pavol J., 1142. Bratislava: Tatran.Google Scholar
Kollár, Ján. (1830) 1991. “Ján Kollár Františkovi Palackému 29.5.1830.” In Listy Ján Kollára I, 1816–1839, edited by Ambruš, Jozef, 99100. Martin: Matica slovenská.Google Scholar
Kollár, Ján. (1837) 2008. Reciprocity between the Various Tribes and Dialects of the Slavic Nation, translated and edited by Maxwell, Alexander. Bloomington: Slavica.Google Scholar
Kollár, Ján. 2009. “Pamäti z mladších rokov života.” In Dielo, 141–307. Edited by Vojtech, Miroslav. Bratislava: Kalligram.Google Scholar
Kürti, László. 2012. “Liberty, Equality, and Nationality: National Liberalism, Modernization, and Empire in Hungary in the Nineteenth Century.” In Liberal Imperialism in Europe, edited by Fitzpatrick, Matthew P., 91114. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Launer, Štěpan. 1847. Povaha Slovanstva, se zvláštním ohledem na spisovní reč Čechů, Moravanů, Slezáků a Slováků. Lipsko: Slovanské kněhkupectví.Google Scholar
Macura, Vladimír. 1983. Znamení zrodu. České obrození jako kulturní typ. Prague: Československý spisovatel.Google Scholar
Martinkovič, Marcel. 2020. “The Ethics of Responsibility in Ján Palárik’s Civic Liberalism.” Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) 10 (3–4): 133145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masaryk, Tomáš Garrigue. (1895) 1990. Česká otázka. Naše nynější krize. Prague: Svoboda.Google Scholar
Masaryk, Tomáš Garrigue. (1894) 2017. “List J. S. Macharovi z Bystričky 26.8.1894 (list č. 30).” In Korespondence. T. G. Masaryk – Josef Svatopluk Machar, sv. 1 (1893–1895) , edited by Kokešová, Helena, Kotyk, Petr, and Kraitlová, Irena, 124126. Prague: Masarykův ústav a Archiv AV ČR.Google Scholar
Matula, Vladimír. 1999. “Komentáre II.” In Ľudovít Štúr, Listy IV. Dodatky, edited by Matula, Vladimír, 201265. Bratislava: Národné literárne centrum.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Alexander. 2005. “Multiple Nationalism: National Concepts in Nineteenth-Century Hungary and Benedict Anderson’s ‘Imagined Communities.’Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 11 (3): 385414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Alexander. 2008. “Ján Kollár’s Literary Nationalism.” In Reciprocity between the Various Tribes and Dialects of the Slavic Nation by Ján Kollár, 167. Translated and edited by Maxwell, Alexander. Bloomington: Slavica.Google Scholar
Maxwell, Alexander. 2009. Choosing Slovakia: Slavic Hungary, the Czechoslovak Language and Accidental Nationalism. London: I. B. Tauris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Alexander. 2016. “Hungaro-German Dual Nationality: Germans, Slavs, and Magyars during the 1848 Revolution.” German Studies Review 39 (1): 1739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Alexander. 2018. “‘Supplicant Nationalism’ in Slovakia and Wales: Polyethnic Rights during the Nineteenth Century.” Central Europe 16 (1): 2950.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Alexander. 2019. Everyday Nationalism in Hungary, 1789–1867. Berlin: De Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Alexander. 2020. “Contingency and ‘National Awakening.’Nationalism and Ethnic Politics 26 (2): 183201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, Alexander & Turner, Molly. 2020. “Nationalists Rejecting Statehood: Three Case Studies from Wales, Catalonia, and Slovakia.” Nations and Nationalism 26 (3): 692707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mésároš, Július. 1978. “Na prahu nového storočia.” In Slovensko: Dejiny I., edited by Tibenský, Ján, 591651. Bratislava: Obzor.Google Scholar
Mináč, Vladimír. (1965) 2014. “Tu žije národ.” In Dúchanie do pahrieb. Návraty k prevratu, 1541. Bratislava: Matica slovenská.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, Stephen. 2019. “The ‘Slovakization’ of 19th-Century Migrants from Upper Hungary to the United States: A Case Study in the Politics of Language Use.” Nationalities Papers 47 (5): 840852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ormis, Ján V., ed. 1973. O reč a národ. Slovenské národné obrany z rokov 1832–1848. Bratislava: SAV.Google Scholar
Palacký, František. 1846. “O národech uherských, zwláště Slovanech.” In Hlasowé o potřebě jednoty spisowného jazyka pro Čechy, Morawany a Slowáky, edited by Kollár, Ján, 2533. Prague: Kronberger & Řiwnáč.Google Scholar
Palacký, František. (1829) 1879. “Dopisy Františka Palackého k Janu Kollárovi.” Časopis Musea království českého 53 (25): 378397.Google Scholar
Palárik, Ján. (1860) 2010. “What Should We Expect from the Hungarian Constitution for Our Nationality and What Do We Need Most Now?” In Modernism: The Creation of Nation-States, edited by Ersoy, Ahmet, Górny, Maciej, and Kechriotis, Vangelis, 4649. Budapest: CEU Press.Google Scholar
Paul, David W. 1985. “Slovak Nationalism and the Hungarian State 1870–1910.” In Ethnic Groups and the State, edited by Brass, Paul, 115159. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Péter, László. 2012. Hungary’s Long Nineteenth Century: Constitutional and Democratic Traditions in a European Perspective, edited by Lojkó, Miklós. Leiden and Boston: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pichler, Tibor. 2011. Etnos a polis. Zo slovenského a uhorského politického myslenia. Bratislava: Kalligram.Google Scholar
Prelick, István. 1841. “Pillantás Magyarország állapotjára.” Századunk 4 (51–52): 394397.Google Scholar
Podrimavský, Milan. 1983. Slovenská národná strana v druhej polovici XIX. storočia. Bratislava: Veda.Google Scholar
Pulszky, Ferenc. (1842) 1943. “A szlávok literariai viszonosságáról.” In Slovenský prestolný prosbopis z roku 1842, II. diel. Dokumenty, edited by Rapant, Daniel, 410413. Liptovský Svätý Mikuláš: Tranoscius.Google Scholar
Pulszky, Ferenc. (1841) 1943. “Ungarische Zustände. Aus Ungarn. Anfang März.” In Slovenský prestolný prosbopis z roku 1842, II. diel. Dokumenty, edited by Rapant, Daniel, 139140. Liptovský Svätý Mikuláš: Tranoscius.Google Scholar
Pynsent, Robert B. 1994. Questions of Identity: Czech and Slovak Ideas of Nationality and Personality. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Rapant, Daniel. 1950. Slovenské povstanie roku 1848–49, diel druhý. Turčiansky Svätý Martin: Matica slovenská.Google Scholar
Rapant, Daniel. 1943. Slovenský prestolný prosbopis z roku 1842, diel prvý. Úvod. Liptovský Svätý Mikuláš: Tranoscius.Google Scholar
Rapant, Daniel. 1937. Slovenské povstanie roku 1848–49, diel prvý. Turčiansky Svätý Martin: Matica slovenská.Google Scholar
Sasinek, Franko V. 1878. Dejiny drievnych národov na území terajšieho Uhorska, 2nd ed. Turčiansky Svätý Martin: Kníhtlačiarsky účastinársky spolok.Google Scholar
Seton-Watson, Robert. 1908. Racial Problems in Hungary. London: Archibald Constable.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 2009. Ethno-Symbolism and Nationalism: A Cultural Approach. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1999. Myths and Memories of the Nation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1998. Nationalism and Modernism: A Critical Survey of Recent Theories of Nations and Nationalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1995. Nations and Nationalism in a Global Era. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1991. National Identity. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Smith, Anthony D. 1988. The Ethnic Origins of Nations, 2nd ed. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Spiesz, Anton, and Caplovic, Dusan. 2006. Illustrated Slovak History, edited by Bolchazy, Ladislaus J.. Wauconda: Bolchazy-Carducci Publishers.Google Scholar
Šafárik, Pavol Jozef. (1842) 1955. Slovanský národopis. Prague: ČSAV.Google Scholar
Šafárik, Pavol Jozef. 1837. Slowanské starožitnosti. Prague: Pomocj Českého museum.Google Scholar
Šafárik, Pavol Jozef. 1826. Geschichte der slawischen Sprache und Literatur nach allen Mundarten. Ofen: Kön. Ung. Universitäts.Google Scholar
Šembera, Alois Wojtěch. 1846. “Z dopisu J. Kollárowi.” In Hlasowé o potřebě jednoty spisowného jazyka pro Čechy, Morawany a Slowáky, edited by Kollár, Ján, 183184. Prague: Kronberger & Řiwnáč.Google Scholar
Štefánek, Anton. (1910) 1973. “Mladé Maďarstvo.” In Literárne vzťahy slovensko-maďarské, edited by Chmel, Rudolf, 273275. Martin: Osveta.Google Scholar
Štefanovič, Samuel D. (1886) 1988. “Slovenské povstanie z roku 1848/49. Na základe pravdy a skutočnosti…” In Slovenské povstanie 1848–1849, edited by Kraus, Cyril, 183223. Bratislava: Tatran.Google Scholar
Štúr, Ľudovít. (1844–1855) 1956. Listy II (1844–1855) . Edited by Ambruš, Jozef. Bratislava: VSAV.Google Scholar
Štúr, Ľudovít. (1847) 1986. “Naše nádeje a žiadosti k nastávajúcemu snemu.” In Dielo II, 128149. Edited by Ambruš, Jozef. Bratislava: Tatran.Google Scholar
Štúr, Ľudovít. (1846) 1986a. “Jánovi Kollárovi.” In Dielo I, 323324. Edited by Ambruš, Jozef. Bratislava: Tatran.Google Scholar
Štúr, Ľudovít. (1846) 1986b. “Naše položenie vo vlasti.” In Dielo I, 541554. Edited by Ambruš, Jozef. Bratislava: Tatran.Google Scholar
Štúr, Ľudovít. 1843. Die Beschwerden und Klagen der Slaven in Ungarn. Leipzig: Robert Binder.Google Scholar
Taylor, Alan John Percivale. 1948. The Habsburg Monarchy 1809–1918. London: Hamish Hamilton.Google Scholar
Teich, Mikuláš, Kováč, Dušan, and Brown, Martin D.. 2011. Slovakia in History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thaisz, Endre. 1825. “Elme-futtatás a’ Magyar Nyelv’ becsüléséről.” Felső-Magyarországi Minerva 1 (4): 483488.Google Scholar
Waldenberg, Marek. 2000. Narody zależne i mniejszości narodowe w Europie Środkowo-Wschodniej. Dzieje konfliktów i idei. Warszawa: PWN.Google Scholar
Yakobson, Alexander. 2013. “State, National Identity, Ethnicity: Normative and Constitutional Aspects.” In Nations: The Long History and Deep Roots of Political Ethnicity and Nationalism by Azar Gat, 328379. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Zay, Carl. 1841. Protestantismus, Magyarismus, Slawismus. Leipzig: Georg Wigand.Google Scholar
Záturecký, Adolf Peter. 1897. Slovenská přísloví, pořekadla a úsloví. Prague: Česká akademie.Google Scholar
Zozuľak, Ján. 2021. “Philosophical, Anthropological and Axiological Aspects of Constantine’s Definition of Philosophy.” Ethics & Bioethics (in Central Europe) 11 (1–2): 1422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar