No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
“All Parties Treat Silesians Instrumentally”: On Political Representation at the Regional Level
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 October 2020
Abstract
The turn of the 20th century experienced an intensification of processes that strengthened Silesian identity, which became an important element of political debate in the region. This was reflected in the emergence of a growing number of entities that placed Silesian issues among their priority objectives and defined themselves as representatives of the interests of Silesia and Silesians. The aim of the study was to verify the political representative potential of groups in Upper Silesia. We accepted the hypothesis that the stronger the identity of a particular group (regional or national) the greater the probability that entities placing fundamental objectives strictly within the scope of regional issues should enjoy broad support in the region, and such entities consequently should be perceived as political representatives of the group. A study conducted using the categorized interview method (N=54) proves quite clearly that Silesians are unable to identify entities on the regional political scene that could represent them sufficiently. The determinants of this state of affairs are found not only in the negative actions of political entities but also in the absence of a clear vision of representation, which could constitute a basis for the formulated expectations of Silesians.
- Type
- Article
- Information
- Copyright
- © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Association for the Study of Nationalities
References
Beatty, Paul, and Willis, Gordon. 2007. “Research Synthesis: The Practice of Cognitive Interviewing.” Public Opinion Quarterly 71: 287–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brettschneider, Frank. 1996. “Public Opinion and Parliamentary Action: Responsiveness of the German Bundestag in Comparative Perspective.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 8 (3): 292–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Contogeorgis, Georges. 2017. “De la démocratie: Questions de concepts et de méthode.” Revista de Estudos do Século 17: 15–32.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J., Farrell, David M., and Mcallister, Ian. 2011. “The Dynamics of Political Representation.” In How Democracy Works: Political Representation and Policy Congruence in Modern Societies, edited by Martin Rosema, Bas Denters, and Kees Aarts, 21–38. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
Pitkin, Fenichel, Hanna. 1972. The Concept of Representation. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Glajcar, Rafał. 2013. “Specyfika Śląska Cieszyńskiego – struktura wyznaniowa i autoidentyfikacja mieszkańców a ich postawy polityczne (na przykładzie powiatu cieszyńskiego).” In Vademecum Śląsk: badania śląskoznawcze, edited by Podgórska-Rykała, Joanna, Stelmach, Katarzyna, and Wichura, Jarosław, 49–66. Katowice: Towarzystwo Inicjatyw Naukowych.Google Scholar
Hobolt, Sara Binzer, and Klemmemsen, Robert. 2005. “Responsive Government? Public Opinion and Government Policy Preferences in Britain and Denmark.” Political Studies 53: 379–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Judge, David. 1999. Representation: Theory and Practice in Britain . London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kocyba, Piotr, and Riedel, Rafał. 2015. “Polskie partie polityczne wobec kwestii śląskiej na przykładzie stosunku do Ruchu Autonomii Śląska.” Myśl Ekonomiczna i Polityczna 2 (49): 263–277.Google Scholar
Maleczyński, Karol. 1961. “Śląsk między Polską, Czechami i Niemcami w X wieku.” Sborník prací Filosofické faktulty Brněnské university 10: 18–28.Google Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monroe, Alan D. 1998. “Public Opinion and Public Policy, 1980–1993.” Public Opinion Quarterly 62 (1): 6–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muś, Anna. 2016. “ ‘Wolny Region Śląsk’? Refleksja nad genezą poszukiwania nowych rozwiązań dla Górnego Śląska w okresie dwudziestolecia międzywojennego.” Pogranicze: Polish Borderlands Studies 4 (1): 43–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muś, Anna, and Mazalik, Krystyna. 2019. “ ‘Ukryta opcja niemiecka’ – mniejszość niemiecka i śląska grupa etniczna w przestrzeni publicznej. Studium przypadku.” Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska 26 (1): 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Małgorzata, Myśliwiec. 2014. “Górnośląski regionalizm – oddziaływanie wzorców europejskich.” In Śląsk – 10 lat członkostwa w Unii Europejskiej, edited by Riedel, Rafał, 93–114. Racibórz-Wrocław: o-to.pl.Google Scholar
PKW (Panstowowa Komisja Wyborcza). n.d. State Election Commission. https://pkw.gov.pl/. (Accessed June 19, 2020.)Google Scholar
Polska Times
. 2011. “Kaczyński: Zakamuflowaną opcją niemiecką jest śląskość w wydaniu RAŚ.” June 4, 2011. http://www.polskatimes.pl/artykul/389276,kaczynski-zakamuflowana-opcja-niemiecka-jest-slaskosc-w-wydaniu-ras,id,t.html. (Accessed June 19, 2020.)Google Scholar
Runciman, David, and Vieira, Mónica Brito. 2008. Representation. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Saward, Michael. 2010. The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sekuła, Elżbieta A. 2010. “Kultury pamięci Górnoślązaków.” In Pamięć, przestrzeń, tożsamość, edited by Kapralski, Sławomir, 119–139. Warszawa: SCHOLAR Publishing House.Google Scholar
Sewell, William H. Jr. 1994. A Rhetoric of Bourgeois Revolution: The Abbé Sieyes and What Is the Third Estate? Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2003. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian, Stokes, Susan C., Wood, Elisabeth Jean, and Kirshner, Alexander S., eds. 2009. Political Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Siuciak, Mirosława. 2011. “Historyczne podstawy świadomości narodowej Ślązaków.” Białostockie Archiwum Językowe 11: 223–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
GUS (Główny Urząd Statystyczny). 2015.
Struktura narodowo-etniczna, językowa i wyznaniowa ludności Polski. Narodowy spis powszechny Ludności i Mieszkań. 2011.
Warszawa: Główny Urząd Statystyczny.Google Scholar
Sztompka, Piotr. 1991. Society in Action: The Theory of Social Becoming. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Szymanek, Jarosław. 2013.
Reprezentacja i mandat parlamentarny
. Teoretyczne interpretacje przedstawicielstwa politycznego. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sejmowe.Google Scholar
Szymanek, Jarosław. 2014. “Nowe interpretacje zasady reprezentacji politycznej.” Przegląd Sejmowy 6 (125): 11–34.Google Scholar
Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka. 2013. “Tożsamość miejsca w strategiach polskich organizacji regionalnych.” Roczniki Nauk Społecznych 1: 35–51.Google Scholar
Turska-Kawa, Agnieszka, and Haček, Miro. 2017. “Local Elections as a Sphere for Forming Citizens’ Political Identity.” Politics in Central Europe 13 (2/3): 53–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 2005. “Continuity and Rupture: The Power of Judgment in Democratic Representation.” Constellations 12 (2): 194–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia. 2006. Representative Democracy: Principles and Genealogy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urbinati, Nadia, and Warren, Mark E.. 2008. “The Concept of Representation in Contemporary Democratic Theory.” Annual Review of Political Science 11: 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Urwin, Derek W. 1983. “Harbringer, Fossil or Fleabite? Regionalism and the West European Party Mosaic.” In Western European Party Systems, edited by Daalder, Hans and Mair, Peter, 221–256. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Wądołowski, Marcin. 2015. “ ‘Piąta strona świata’ – Górny Śląsk we współczesnej kulturze.” Studia Humanistyczne AGH 14 (3): 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wlezien, Chrisopher. 1995. “The Public as Thermostat: Dynamics of Preferences for Spending.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 981–1000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wojtasik, Waldemar. 2019. “Electoral Manipulation via Media: Theory and Evidence.” Communication Today 10 (2): 28-40.Google Scholar