Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-18T08:10:24.493Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Can We Learn from Yugoslavia?

Review products

Liquid Nationalism and State Partitions in Europe, by BianchiniStefano, Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar, 2017, 360 pp., $158.00 (hardcover), ISBN 9781786436603.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 June 2022

Susan L. Woodward*
Affiliation:
The Graduate Center, City University of New York, USA

Extract

Liquid Nationalism and State Partitions in Europe is Stefano Bianchini’s magnum opus, reflecting a lifetime of working on the issues of ethno-nationalism in Europe, from Southeast Europe through Central Europe and the former Soviet space to all of western Europe. It is more than a book; it is an entire seminar, ranging not only geographically but also historically, from the Enlightenment to the second decade of the 21st century. Simply a list of the gems I learned would usurp all the space I have been given for this essay and much more. I choose to focus on one small part, what I take to be the primary motivation behind this book, namely his anguish over the lessons for western Europe “not learned from the dismemberment of Yugoslavia” (the title of Chapter 10), a case he knows so well. That chapter then begins with a quotation from another specialist on Yugoslavia, Jacques Rupnik, in Le Monde in 2014, “the greatest obstacle to the Europeanization of the Balkans is the Balkanization of Europe” (185). Nor are Bianchini and Rupnik alone in this concern. Already in 2012, Ivan Krastev convened two parallel seminars at the Institute for Human Sciences in Vienna on what he called, “The Logics of Disintegration” – of the Soviet case (Part I) and the Habsburg and Yugoslav cases (Part II) and their lessons for the European Union.

Type
Book Symposium
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Association for the Study of Nationalities

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Calic, Marie-Janine, and Geyer, Dona. 2019. A History of Yugoslavia. Purdue, IL: Purdue University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calic, Marie-Janine, and Janik, Elisabeth. 2019. The Great Cauldron: A History of Southeastern Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fearon, James D., and Laitin, David. 2003. “Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War.” American Political Science Review 97 (1): 91106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferguson, James, and Gupta, Akhil. 2008. “Spatializing States: toward an Ethnography of Neoliberal Governmentality.” American Ethnologist 29 (4): 9811002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred. 1992. “Political Identities and Electoral Sequences: Spain, the Soviet Union, and Yugoslavia.” Daedalus 121 (Spring 1992): 123–40.Google Scholar
Sambanis, Nicholas, and Shayo, Moses. 2013. “Social Identification and Ethnic Conflict.” American Political Science Review 107 (2): 294325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stepan, Alfred. 2001. “Toward a New Comparative Politics of Federalism, (Multi)Nationalism, and Democracy: Beyond Rikerian Federalism.” In Arguing Comparative Politics, edited by Stepan, A., 315361. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Woodward, Susan L. 1995. Socialist Unemployment: the Political Economy of Yugoslavia, 194590. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodward, Susan L. 2007. “Does Kosovo’s Status Matter? On the International Management of Statehood.” Südosteuropa 55:1 (March 2007): 125.Google Scholar
Woodward, Susan L. 2011. “Varieties of State-building in the Balkans: A Case for Shifting Focus.” In Postwar Reconstruction. The Berghof Handbook for Conflict Transformation II, edited by Austin, Beatrix, Fischer, Martina, and Gliessmann, Hans J.. Opladen/Farmington Hills: Barbara Budrich Publishers.Google Scholar