Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-05-17T23:43:05.724Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Counting citizens: the transfer and translation of census categories from the international statistical congresses to the principality of Bulgaria (1872–1888)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Gayle Lonergan Open the ORCID record for Gayle Lonergan [Opens in a new window]
Gayle Lonergan*
Affiliation:
The Centre for Historical Research, Higher School of Economics, St. Petersburg, Russia
*
*Email: gayle.lonergan@icloud.com
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper examines the nineteenth-century census as an early information technology and a medium for the transnational exchange of ideas in the nineteenth century. In particular, it considers how the ideas discussed by the International Statistical Congresses were directly applied in the newly established kingdom of Bulgaria in the first censuses from 1881 to 1888. It then examines how the legacy of Ottoman rule and the categories of the nineteenth-century Ottoman censuses unconsciously influenced the first census of Bulgaria, despite the desire of the new rulers to mark a significant break with the past. It also demonstrates how the nationalist feeling in the multiethnic former territory of the Ottoman Empire influenced the seemingly neutral categories of the first census. These categories then began to produce an implicit representation of the ideal Bulgarian citizen and so started the process of exclusion of the Turkish-speaking or Muslim population from full membership of the new body politic.

Keywords

BulgariaInternational Statistical Congresscensusnational identityethnicityminoritiesTurks
Type
Research Article
Information
Nationalities Papers , Volume 46 , Issue 4: Special Section: Classification , July 2018 , pp. 556 - 574
Copyright
Copyright © 2018 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abashin, Sergei. 2011. “Empire and Demography in Turkistan: Numbers and the Politics of Counting.” In Asiatic Russia: Imperial Power in Regional and International Contexts, edited by Uyama, Tomohiko, 129–150. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Anderson, Margo J. 1988. The American Census: A Social History. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1993. “Number in the Colonial Imagination.” In Orientalism and the Postcolonial Predicament, edited by Breckenridge, Carol A. and van der Veer, Peter, 315–339. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Behar, Cem. 1998. “Qui Compte? ‘Recensements’ Et Statistiques Demographiques Dans l'Empire Ottoman, Du XVIe Au XXe Siecle. (French).” Histoire & Mesure 13 (1): 135–145.Google Scholar
Brown, Samuel. 1872. “Report on the Eighth International Statistical Congress, Held at St. Petersburg, 22nd/10th August to 29th/17th, 1872.” Journal of the Statistical Society of London 35 (4): 431–457.Google Scholar
Cadiot, Juliette. 2005. “Searching for Nationality: Statistics and National Categories at the End of the Russian Empire (1897–1917).” Russian Review 64 (3): 440–455.Google Scholar
Cohn, Bernard S. 1987. “Census, Social Structure and Objectification in South Asia.” In An Anthropologist among the Historians and Other Essays, edited by Cohn, Bernard S., 224–254. Delhi: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Curtis, Bruce. 2001. The Politics of Population: State Formation, Statistics, and the Census of Canada, 1840–1875. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Daskalov, Rumen. 2004. The Making of a Nation in the Balkans: Historiography of the Bulgarian Revival. Budapest: Central European University Press.Google Scholar
Desrosières, Alain. 1998. The Politics of Large Numbers: A History of Statistical Reasoning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Direktsiata na v'treshnite dela, Vostochno Rumelia. 1880. Ofitsialna Statistika Na Istochno-Rumeleiskoto Naselenie. Plovdiv: B'rzotiskna Pechatnitsa i Litografiyana Yanko S Kovachev.Google Scholar
Dragostinova, Theodora. 2008. “Speaking National: Nationalizing the Greeks of Bulgaria, 1900–1939.” Slavic Review 67 (2): 154–181.Google Scholar
Drinov, M. 1871. “Otets Paisi, Negovoto Vreme, Negovoto Istoriia I Uchenitsite Mu.” Periodicheskoe Spisanie Na Bulgarskoto Knizhovno Druzhestvo 3–26.Google Scholar
Dundar, Fuat. 2015. “Empire of Taxonomy: Ethnic and Religious Identities in the Ottoman Surveys and Censuses.” Middle Eastern Studies 51 (1): 136–158.Google Scholar
Eminov, Ali. 1989. “There Are No Turks in Bulgaria: Rewriting History by Administrative Fiat.” International Journal of Turkish Studies 4 (2): 203–222.Google Scholar
Eminov, Ali. 2000. “Turks and Tatars in Bulgaria and the Balkans.” Nationalities Papers 28 (1): 129–164.Google Scholar
Glass, David. V. 1973. Numbering the People: The Eighteenth-Century Population Controversy and the Development of Census and Vital Statistics in Britain. Farnborough, DC: Heath.Google Scholar
Higgs, Edward. 2005. Making Sense of the Census Revisited: Census Records for England and Wales 1801–1901: A Handbook for Historical Researchers. London: Institute of Historical Research.Google Scholar
Hilendarski, Paisii. 2004. Istoria slavyanob'lgarska – 1762 Belova. Sofia: Un.Izd. Sv. Kliment Okhridski.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Francine. 2005. Empire of Nations: Ethnographic Knowledge and the Making of the Soviet Union. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Jennifer L., and Powell, Brenna Marea. 2008. “Racial Reorganization and the United States Census 1850–1930: Mulattoes, Half-Breeds, Mixed Parentage, Hindoos, and the Mexican Race.” Studies in American Political Development 22 (1): 59–96.Google Scholar
Ibragimova, Z. K. 2006. Chechentsy v Zerkale Tsarskoi Statistiki, 1860–1900. Moscow: Probel-2000.Google Scholar
Institute of Statistics. 2000. Osmanli devleti'nde Bilgi Ve Istatistik = Data and Statistics in the Ottoman Empire, edited by Devlet, Şevket Pamuk. Ankara: istatistik Enstitüsü (State Institute of Statistics).Google Scholar
Jirecek, Josef Konstantin. 1886. Istoriiata na B'lgarite. Popraveno i dop'ln. s pribavleniiata ot samiit avtor. T'rnovo: T'rnovo.Google Scholar
Katsikas, Stefanos. 2009. “Millets in Nation-States: The Case of Greek and Bulgarian Muslims, 1912–1923.” Nationalities Papers 37 (2): 177–201.Google Scholar
Kertzer, David I., and Arel, Dominique. 2002. Census and Identity: The Politics of Race, Ethnicity, and Language in National Censuses. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
King, Jeremy. 2002. Budweisers into Czechs and Germans: A Local History of Bohemian Politics, 1848–1948. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Klein-Pejšová, Rebekah. 2015. Mapping Jewish Loyalties in Interwar Slovakia. Modern Jewish Experience. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, Nathaniel. 2000. “Ethnicity, Nationality and the Masses: Narodnost' and Modernity in Imperial Russia.” In Russian Modernity, edited by Hoffman, David L. and Kotsonis, Yanni, 41–64. Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Kreager, Philip. 2004. “Objectifying Demographic Identities.” In Categories and Contexts: Anthropological and Historical Studies in Critical Demography, edited by Szreter, Simon, Sholkamy, Hania, and Dharmalingam, A., 1st ed., 33–56. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Labbé, Morgane. 1997. “Le Projet d'une Statistique Des Nationalités Discutés Dans Les Sessions Du Congrès International De Statistique (1853–1876).” In Demographie Et Politique, edited by Ronsin, F., Bras, H. Le, and Zucker, E., 127–142. Dijon: Editions Universitaires de Dijon.Google Scholar
Lee, Robert. 2006. “Defining Population by Statistics c. 1850–1939; German Practice within a European Context.” In Bevölkerungsforschung Und Politik in Deutschland Im 20. Jahrhundert, edited by Mackensen, Rainer, 89–117. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Mirkova, Anna M. 2009. “Citizenship Formation in Bulgaria: Protected Minority or National Citizens?” Journal of Muslim Minority Affairs 29 (4): 469–482.Google Scholar
Noiriel, Gé, and Laforcade, Geoffroy de. 1996. The French Melting Pot: Immigration, Citizenship, and National Identity. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Pundeff, Marin V. 1994. “Bulgarian Nationalism.” In Nationalism in Eastern Europe, edited by Sugar, Peter F. and Lederer, Ivo J., 93–165. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Randeraad, Nico. 2011. “The International Statistical Congress (1853–1876): Knowledge Transfers and their Limits.” European History Quarterly 41 (1): 50–65.Google Scholar
Report of the Delegates to the International Statistical Congress held at St Petersburg in August 1872. 1875. Washington: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, Clara E. 2000. Changing Race: Latinos, the Census, and the History of Ethnicity in the United States. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Saetnan, Ann Rudinow, Lomell, Heidi Mork, and Hammer, Svein, eds. 2011. The Mutual Construction of Statistics and Society. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Sarafov, M. K. 1893. Naselenieto v kniazhestvo Bulgaria po trite p'rvi prebroiavaniia. Sofia: Sredec.Google Scholar
Shterionov, S. 2004. “Karti Za Prebroyavane Na Naselenieto V Sledosvobozhdenskata B'lgarska Statisticheska Praktika.” Naselenie 1–2:114–129.Google Scholar
Skerry, Peter. 2000. Counting on the Census? Race, Group Identity, and the Evasion of Politics. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Szreter, Simon. 1984. “The Genesis of the Registrar- General's Social Classification of Occupations.” The British Journal of Sociology 35 (4): 522–546.Google Scholar
Todorakova, Milena. 2005. “Suedinenieto – Put Kum Izgrazhdaneto na Edinni Natsionalni Institutsii i Bulgarska Durzhavnost.” Izvestiia Na Durzhavnite Arkhivi 89:31–107.Google Scholar
Todorova, Maria. 1996. “The Ottoman Legacy in the Balkans.” In Imperial Legacy: The Ottoman Imprint on the Balkans and the Middle East, edited by Brown, L. Carl, 45–77. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Todorova, Maria. 1997. “Identity (Trans)Formation among Pomaks in Bulgaria.” In The Myth of “Ethnic Conflict”: Politics, Economics, and “Cultural” Violence, edited by Crawford, Beverly and Lipschutz, Ronnie D., 471–510. Berkeley: University of California.Google Scholar
Wingfield, Nancy M., and Paces, Cynthia. 2005. “The Sacred and the Profane: Religion and Nationalism in the Bohemian Lands, 1880–1920.” In Constructing Nationalities in East Central Europe, edited by Judson, Pieter M. and Rozenbilt, Marsha L., 107–125. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar