Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-m9kch Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-17T12:18:43.831Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Politicization of the Environmental Issue within the Russian Nationalistic Movement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 November 2018

Dina Zisserman*
Affiliation:
The Hebrew University, Israel

Extract

The present article is concerned with the ethnopolitical dimensions of the environmental problem within the Russian nationalistic movement in the USSR. As distinct from Western Europe, there has never been a “pure” ecological movement in the Soviet Union, and until recently the environmental issue has been raised mainly by national movements as a part of the national question.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 Association for the Study of Nationalities 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Notes

1. Zemlia, No. 1. 1974. Sobranie dokumentov samizdata. Radio Svoboda. Arkhiv Samizdata (AS), No. 1909.Google Scholar

2. Sobranie dokumentov samizdata. AS, No. 349.Google Scholar

3. Materialy samizdata. AS, No. 4987.Google Scholar

4. Sobranie dokumentoy samizdata. AS, No. 1013.Google Scholar

5. Ibid., No. 1801.Google Scholar

6. Ibid., No. 1801.Google Scholar

7. Ibid., No. 1013. He means the architects I. Rerberg, who built the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet, and K. Ton, the creator of the Big Palace of the Kremlin.Google Scholar

8. Materialy Samizdata. AS, No. 4887.Google Scholar

9. On this issue see: “Vozzvaniye Patrioticheskovo Obyedineniya Pamiyat,” 1987; “Ochischeniye,” 1988; “Manifest Natsional'no patrioticheskovo Fronta Pamiyat,” 1988.Google Scholar

10. Sobranie dokumentov samizdata. AS, No. 1108.Google Scholar

11. Ibid.Google Scholar

12. Solzhenitsyn, A., “Letter to Soviet Leaders” (London: Index on Censorship, 1974).Google Scholar

13. Ibid., p. 22.Google Scholar

14. Ibid., p. 27.Google Scholar

15. Ibid., p. 22.Google Scholar

16. On the Fetisov Group see “Khronika tekuschikh sobytiy,” Sobraniye dokumentov samizdata, No. 7. AS, No. 197.Google Scholar

17. On this issue see Pika, A. and Prokhorov, B., “Bolshiye problemy malykh narodov,” Kommunist, No. 16, 1989.Google Scholar

18. Solzhenitsyn, A., op. cit ., p. 27.Google Scholar

19. Sobraniye dokumentov samizdata. AS, No. 3256.Google Scholar

20. Literaturnaya Rossiya , 16 February 1990.Google Scholar

21. Materialy Samizdata. AS, No. 6349.Google Scholar

22. Ibid.Google Scholar

23. “For the policy of the national alliance and Russian revival,” Literaturnaya Rossia , 9 February 1990.Google Scholar

24. Materialy samizdata. AS, No. 6397.Google Scholar

25. Ibid.Google Scholar

26. On the disastrous effects of the “governmental concern” about this area, see Z. Volfson, “Central Asian Environment: A Dead End?” and Khazanov, A., “The Ecological Situation and National Issue in Uzbekistan,” Environmental Policy Review, Vol. 45, No. 1, 1990.Google Scholar

27. Nash sovremennik , No. 2, 1989, p. 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

28. “For the policy of the National Alliance,” see Literaturnaya Rossisya , 9 February 1990.Google Scholar

29. Lemeshev, M., “To Prevent the Mortal Menace,” Literaturnaya Rossiya , 16 February 1990.Google Scholar

30. Nash Sovremennik , No. 5, 1989.Google Scholar

31. Literaturaya Rossia , 15 September 1989.Google Scholar

32. The leaflet, written after June 1989, was received from the USSR.Google Scholar

33. Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar

34. Ibid., p. 7.Google Scholar

35. Ibid., pp. 78.Google Scholar

36. Ibid., p. 8.Google Scholar

37. Tchervova, V., “A Frantic Tribune,” Sovetskakya Sibir , 15 September 1989.Google Scholar

38. Literaturnaya Rossiya , 9 February 1990.Google Scholar

39. Ibid.Google Scholar

40. Ibid.Google Scholar

41. Ibid.Google Scholar

42. Nash Sovremennik , No. 5, 1989, p. 167.Google Scholar