Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T05:12:44.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epilogue: Falling Asleep over the History of the Book

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Extract

Ten years ago, in the introduction to his edited collection The Future of the Book, Geoffrey Nunberg predicted, “If we take the book in its broad sense to refer simply to bound, printed volumes, then most books will likely disappear soon.” Imagining the prospect of electronic books, of devices that would present text not just on a screen but on something “almost the equivalent of paper in [its] weight and flexibility,” Nunberg looked forward to a time when printed pages would no longer be the primary bearer of textual information (12). That time has not come. The e-book never seemed to make it, either as a viable technology or as an attractive commercial product. More bound and printed volumes are being made and sold than ever. And the history of the book as an academic discipline continues to grow—not out of a sense that books are history (in the colloquial sense of that phrase) but out of a conviction that they are here to stay and that to know their future we should know their past.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Benton, John. Self and Society in Medieval France: The Memoirs of Abbot Guibert of Nogent. Cambridge, MA: Medieval Acad. of Amer., 1984.Google Scholar
Bishop, Edward L.Book History.” The Johns Hopkins Guide to Literary Theory and Criticism. Ed. Groden, Michael, Kreiswirth, Martin, and Szeman, Imre. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2005. 131–36.Google Scholar
Greetham, D. C. Textual Scholarship. New York: Garland, 1994.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. “Canonical and Non-canonical: A Critique of the Debate.” ELH 54 (1987): 483527.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. Cultural Capital: The Problem of Literary Canon Formation. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1993.Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth. Error and the Academic Self: The Scholarly Imagination, Medieval to Modern. New York: Columbia UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth. “Medieval English Literature and the Idea of the Anthology.” PMLA 118 (2003): 1251–67.Google Scholar
Manguel, Alberto. A History of Reading. New York: Knopf, 1999.Google Scholar
Matthiessen, F. O. The Oxford Book of American Verse. New York: Oxford UP, 1950.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey. Introduction. The Future of the Book. Ed. Nunberg, . Berkeley: U of California P, 1996. 920.Google Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey. “In Unread America.” Fresh Air. Natl. Public Radio. 8 Dec. 2004. Transcript. 20 Sept. 2005 <http://www-csli.stanford.edu/~nunberg/curling.html>..>Google Scholar
Price, Leah. The Anthology and the Rise of the Novel. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowling, J. K. Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban. London: Bloomsbury, 1999.Google Scholar
Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. 2nd ed. Ed. Tolkien, J. R. R., Gordon, E. V., and Davis, Norman. Oxford: Clarendon, 1967.Google Scholar
Spufford, Francis. The Child That Books Built: A Life in Reading. London: Faber, 2002.Google Scholar
Summit, Jennifer. Memory's Library: The Places of Books in Late Medieval and Early Modern England. Chicago: U of Chicago P, forthcoming.Google Scholar