No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Formal, Figural, and Historical: On the Limits of Argumentativity
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 October 2020
Extract
Over lunch with two philosophy professors, i asked their views of what i understood to be a central ambiguity in kant's Critique of Judgment. The question proved controversial for reasons I had not anticipated. One of my interlocutors grew agitated.
- Type
- Theories and Methodologies
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2016
References
Works Cited
Adorno, Theodor. “The Essay as Form.” The Adorno Reader. Ed. O'Connor, Brian. Oxford: Blackwell, 2000. 91–111. Print.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor Minima Moralia: Reflections on a Damaged Life. London: Verso, 2006. Print.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor “Parataxis.” Notes to Literature. Vol. 2. Trans. Shierry Weber Nicholsen. New York: Columbia UP, 1994. 109–52. Print.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. Lectures on Kant's Political Philosophy. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah The Recovery of the Public World. Ed. Hill, Melvyn A. London: St. Martin's, 1979. Print.Google Scholar
Armour, Leslie. Rev. of Time in the Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era, by John McCumber. Library Journal 15 Apr. 2001: 96. Print.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans. “The Concept of Reality and the Possibility of the Novel.” New Perspectives in German Literary Criticism. Ed. Amacher, Richard E. and Lange, Victor. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1979. 29–48. Print.Google Scholar
Blumenberg, Hans Paradigms for a Metaphorology. Trans. Savage, Robert. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 2010. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campe, Rüdiger. Affekt und Ausdruck: Zur Umwandlung der literarischen Rede im 17. und 18. Jahrhundert. Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1990. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campe, Rüdiger “Vor Augen Stellen: Über den Rahmen rhetorischer Bildgebung.” Poststrukturalismus: Herausforderung an die Literaturwissenschaft. Ed. Neumann, Gerhard. Stuttgart: Metzler, 1997. 208–25. Print.Google Scholar
Capps, John. Rev. of Time in the Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era, by John McCumber. Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 37.4 (2001): 677–81. Web. 1 Dec. 2015.Google Scholar
Cohen, Ted. “Philosophy in America: Remarks on John McCumber's Time in the Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era.” Philosophical Studies 108.1–2 (2002): 183–93. Web. 1 Dec. 2015.Google Scholar
“The Eighties: A Snapshot.” Department of Philosophy. Princeton U, 2016. Web. 28 Jan. 2016.Google Scholar
Fleming, Paul, Campe, Rüdiger, and Wetters, Kirk, eds. Hans Blumenberg. Spec. issue of Telos 158 (2012): 1–191. Web. 1 Dec. 2015.Google Scholar
Fulda, Daniel. Wissenschaft aus Kunst: Die Entstehung der modernen deutschen Geschichtsschreibung 1760-1860. Berlin: De Gruyter, 1996. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasché, Rodolphe. “Some Reflections on the Notion of Hypotyposis in Kant.” Argumentation 4.1 (1990): 85–100. Print.Google Scholar
Goetschel, Willi. Constituting Critique: Kant's Writingas Critical Praxis. Durham: Duke UP, 1994. Print.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Trans. McCarthy, Thomas. Boston: Beacon, 1985. Print. Vol. 1 of The Theory of Communicative Action.Google Scholar
Hollinger, David A. “Religion, Ethnicity, and Politics in American Philosophy: Reflections on McCumber's Time in the Ditch.” Philosophical Studies 108.1–2 (2002): 173–81. Web. 22 Mar. 2016.Google Scholar
Holub, Robert. Reception Theory: A Critical Introduction. New York: Methuen, 1984. Print.Google Scholar
Jauss, Hans Robert. “Literary History as a Challenge to Literary Theory.” Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Trans. Bahti, Timothy. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1982. 3–45. Print.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. Critique of the Power of Judgment. Ed. Guyer, Paul. Trans. Guyer and Matthews, Eric. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2000. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, Immanuel “Idea for a Universal History with a Cosmopolitan Purpose.” Political Writings. Ed. Reiss, Hans. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1991. 41–53. Print.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Trans. Tribe, Keith. New York: Columbia UP, 2004. Print.Google Scholar
McClendon, John H., III. “The African American Philosopher: The Missing Chapter in McCumber on McCarthyism.” Cultural Logic (2008): n. pag. Web. 1 Dec. 2015.Google Scholar
McCumber, John. “Just in Time: Toward a New American Philosophy.” Continental Philosophy Review 36 (2003): 61–80. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCumber, John “Philosophy: A Wandering Voice I.” Metaphilosophy: Reflections on the Practices and Institutions of Philosophy. N.p., 2 Sept. 2007. Web. 25 Mar. 2016.Google Scholar
McCumber, John Time in the Ditch: American Philosophy and the McCarthy Era. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 2001. Print.Google Scholar
Müller, Jan-Werner. “On Conceptual History.” Rethinking Modern European Intellectual History. Ed. McMahon, Darrin M. and Moyn, Samuel. Oxford: Oxford UP, 2014. 74–93. Print.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozzo, Riccardo. “Prejudices and Horizons: G. F. Meier's Vernunftlehre and Its Relation to Kant.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 43.2 (2005): 185–202. Web. 22 Mar. 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, Robert. “Metaphorology: A Beginner's Guide.” Afterword. Blumenberg, Paradigms 133–46.Google Scholar
Vaihinger, Hans. The Philosophy of 'As If“: A System of the Theoretical, Practical, and Religious Fictions of Mankind. New York: Routledge, 2000. Print.Google Scholar
White, Hayden. “The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality.” The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1987. 1–25. Print.Google Scholar