Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T07:28:04.719Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction: Ideology and Innocence: On the Politics of Critical Language

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Herbert Lindenberger
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Special Topic: The Politics of Critical Language
Information
PMLA , Volume 105 , Issue 3 , May 1990 , pp. 398 - 408
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Adelman, Janet, et al. “Feminist Criticism.” PMLA 104 (1989): 77–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, Cleanth. The Well Wrought Urn: Studies in the Structure of Poetry. New York: Harcourt, 1947.Google Scholar
Brower, Reuben A.The Fields of Light: An Experiment in Critical Reading. New York: Oxford UP, 1951.Google Scholar
Cohen, Walter. “Political Criticism of Shakespeare.” Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in History and Ideology. Ed. Jean, E. Howard and Marion F. O'Connor. New York: Methuen, 1987. 18–46.Google Scholar
Gelley, Alexander. “Staiger, Heidegger, and the Task of Criticism.” Modern Language Quarterly 23 (1962): 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliburton, David. Poetic Thinking: An Approach to Heidegger. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1981.Google Scholar
Hearne, Vicki. Adam's Task: Calling Animals by Name. New York: Knopf, 1986.Google Scholar
Heidegger, Martin. “Logos (Heraklit, Fragment 50).” Vorträge und Aufsätze. Pfüllingen: Neske, 1954. 207–29.Google Scholar
Hohendahl, Peter Uwe. Building a National Literature: The Case of Germany 1830–1870. Trans. Franciscono, Renate Baron. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1989.Google Scholar
Höllerer, Walter. Zwischen Klassik und Moderne: Lachen und Weinen in derDichtung einer Übergangszeit. Stuttgart: Klett, 1958.Google Scholar
Kern, Edith. “Resolved: That the Proper Study of Mankind Is Man.” PMLA 93 (1978): 361–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Richard. “Feminist Thematics and Shakespearean Tragedy.” PMLA 103 (1988): 125–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spitzer, Leo. Representative Essays. Ed. Forcione, Alban K., Lindenberger, Herbert, and Sutherland, Madeline. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1988.Google Scholar
Spitzer, Leo. “Wiederum Mörikes Gedicht ‘Auf eine Lampe.‘” Trivium 9 (1951): 133–47.Google Scholar
Staiger, Emil. “Dichtung und Nation: Eine Besinnung auf Schiller.” Neue Schweizer Rundschau ns 1 (1933): 157–68.Google Scholar
Staiger, Emil. “Die Kunst der Interpretation.” Neophilologus 35 (1951): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Staiger, Emil. “Zu einem Vers von Mörike: Ein Briefwechsel mit Martin Heidegger.” Trivium 9 (1951): 1–16.Google Scholar
Stern, J.P.Idylls and Realities: Studies in Nineteenth-Century German Literature. New York: Ungar, 1971.Google Scholar
Wayne, Don E. “Power, Politics, and the Shakespearean Text: Recent Criticism in England and the United States.” Shakespeare Reproduced: The Text in History and Ideology. Ed. Jean, E. Howard and Marion F. O'Connor. New York: Methuen, 1987. 47–67.Google Scholar