Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T12:25:39.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Literary Studies: The Southern United States, 2005

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Barbara Ladd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

“The Greatest Mistake Made in Judging Southern Literature, Even by its Friends, is That We are Apt to Speak of it By Itself as if it were a thing apart and a country apart.” John Bell Henneman made this assessment a century ago, in 1903 (347). Fifty-one years later, Jay B. Hubbell observed, “The literature of the South … cannot be understood and appraised if one neglects its many and complicated relations with the literature of the rest of the nation” ('x“). Not long after Louis D. Rubin, Jr., and Robert D. Jacobs published The Southern Renascence: The Literature of the Modern South (1953), a collection of essays by distinguished United States scholars in and beyond the South, the study of southern literature, conceived in the spirit of Henneman and Hubbell, became an academic specialty, with its centers at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill (where Rubin taught); at Vanderbilt University (the home of Thomas Daniel Young, the New Critics, and, a generation earlier, the Agrarians); and at Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge (where Lewis P. Simpson edited the Southern Review). There were outriders: Cleanth Brooks and Robert Penn Warren infiltrated Yale. They made such an impression that, today, when people from the Northeast are asked to define southern United States literature, they are likely to channel Brooks in his emphasis on the importance of family, kinship, community, history, and memory in the imagined South. None of this is meant to imply that the literature of the southern United States was not studied before the mid-fifties; it was. Its departures from the broader national tradition were noted, but it did not constitute an academic specialty as it does today. The publication of The Southern Renascence and subsequent work by Rubin, Hubbell, Brooks and Warren, C. Hugh Holman, and many others not only institutionalized southern literature as a specialization in the United States academy but also defined the field in terms of the South's relations with the rest of the nation.

Type
the changing profession
Information
PMLA , Volume 120 , Issue 5 , October 2005 , pp. 1628 - 1639
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Anderson, Carl L. “Faulkner's ‘Was’: A Deadlier Purpose Than Simple Pleasure.” American Literature 61 (1989): 414–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baker, Houston, and Nelson, Dana. “Violence, the Body and ‘the South.’” Preface. American Literature 73 (2001): 231–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blotner, Joseph. Faulkner, a Biography. New York: Random, 1974.Google Scholar
Brinkmeyer, Robert. Remapping Southern Literature: Contemporary Southern Writers and the West. Athens: U of Georgia P, 2000.Google Scholar
Brooks, Cleanth. “Southern Literature: The Past, History, and the Timeless.” Castille and Osborne 3–15.Google Scholar
Carby, Hazel V. Reconstructing Womanhood: The Emergence of the Afro-American Woman Novelist. New York: Oxford UP, 1987.Google Scholar
Cartwright, Keith. Reading Africa into American Literature: Epics, Fables, and Gothic Tales. Lexington: U of Kentucky P, 2002.Google Scholar
Casey, Edward S. The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History. Berkeley: U of California P, 1997.Google Scholar
Castille, Philip, and Osborne, William, eds. Southern Literature in Transition: Heritage and Promise. Memphis: Memphis State UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Cohn, Deborah. History and Memory in the Two Souths: Recent Southern and Spanish American Fiction. Nashville: Vanderbilt UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Davis, Thadious M. Games of Property: Law, Race, Gender, and Faulkner's Go Down, Moses. Durham: Duke UP, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeMott, Benjamin. The Trouble with Friendship: Why Americans Can't Think Straight about Race. New Haven: Yale UP, 1998.Google Scholar
Donaldson, Susan V., and Jones, AnneGoodwyn. “Haunted Bodies: Rethinking the South through Gender.” Introduction. Jones and Donaldson, Haunted Bodies 1–19.Google Scholar
Ellison, Ralph, Styron, William, Warren, Robert Penn, and Woodward, C. Vann. “A Discussion: The Uses of History in Fiction.” Southern Literary Journal 1.2 (1969): 57–90.Google Scholar
Fayen, Tanya. In Search of the Latin American Faulkner. Lanham: UP of Amer., 1995.Google Scholar
Fitz, Earl. Rediscovering the New World: Inter-American Literature in a Comparative Context. Iowa City: U of Iowa P, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitz, Earl. “William Faulkner, James Agee, and Brazil: The American South in Latin American Literature's ‘Other’ Tradition.” Smith and Cohn 419–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox-Genovese, Elizabeth. Within the Plantation Household: Black and White Women of the Old South. Chapel Hill: U of North Carolina P, 1988.Google Scholar
Glissant, Edouard. “Creolization in the Making of the Americas.” Race, Discourse, and the Origin of the Americas: A New World View. Ed. Hyatt, VeraLawrence and Nettleford, Rex. Washington: Smithsonian Inst. P, 1995. 268–75.Google Scholar
Glissant, Edouard. Faulkner, Mississippi. Trans. Lewis, Barbara and Spear, Thomas C. New York: Farrar, 1999.Google Scholar
Hall, Gwendolyn Midlo. Africans in Colonial Louisiana: The Development of Afro-Creole Culture in the Eighteenth Century. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Henneman, John Bell. “The National Element in Southern Literature.” Sewanee Review 11 (1903): 345–66.Google Scholar
Hobson, Fred. The Southern Writer in the Postmodern World. Mercer U Lamar Memorial Lectures 33. Athens: U of Georgia P, 1991.Google Scholar
Hobson, Fred. Tell about the South: The Southern Rage to Explain. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Holman, C. Hugh. “No More Monoliths Please: Continuities in the Multi-Souths.” Castille and Osborne xiii–xxiv.Google Scholar
Hubbell, Jay B. The South in American Literature, 1604–1900. Durham: Duke UP, 1954.Google Scholar
Jones, Anne Goodwyn, and Donaldson, Susan V., eds. Haunted Bodies: Gender and Southern Texts. Charlottesville: UP of Virginia, 1997.Google Scholar
Jones, Suzanne W. Race Mixing: Southern Fiction since the Sixties. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 2004.Google Scholar
Jones, Suzanne W., and Monteith, Sharon, eds. South to a New Place: Region, Literature, Culture. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Joyner, Charles. Down by the Riverside: A South Carolina Slave Community. Urbana: U of Illinois P, 1984.Google Scholar
Kent, George C. Blackness and the Adventure of Western Culture. Chicago: Third World, 1972.Google Scholar
Kreyling, Michael. Inventing Southern Literature. Jackson: UP of Mississippi, 1998.Google Scholar
Limón, José E. American Encounters: Greater Mexico, the United States, and the Erotics of Culture. Boston: Beacon, 1998.Google Scholar
Lowe, John, ed. Bridging Southern Cultures: An Interdisciplinary Approach. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 2005.Google Scholar
Lowe, John. “Constructing a Cultural Theory for the South.” Introduction. Lowe, Bridging 1–28.Google Scholar
MacKethan, Lucinda. “Domesticity in Dixie: The Plantation Novel and Uncle Tom's Cabin.” Jones and Donaldson, Haunted Bodies 223–42.Google Scholar
McCaughey, Robert A. Josiah Quincy, 1772–1864: The Last Federalist. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1974.Google Scholar
McNaughton, Patrick. The Mande Blacksmiths: Knowledge, Power, and Art in West Africa. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1988.Google Scholar
McWilliams, Carey. North from Mexico: The Spanish-Speaking People of the United States. Philadelphia: Lippincott, 1949.Google Scholar
Morrison, Toni. Beloved. New York: Random, 1987.Google Scholar
Morrison, Toni. Playing in the Dark: Whiteness and the Literary Imagination. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1992.Google Scholar
Nora, Pierre. “Between Memory and History: Les Lieux de Mémoire.” Representations 26 (1989): 7–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Cecil. Mexico and the Hispanic Southwest in American Literature. Tucson: U of Arizona P, 1977.Google Scholar
Robinson, Cecil. No Short Journeys: The Interplay of Cultures in the History and Literature of the Borderlands. Tucson: U of Arizona P, 1992.Google Scholar
Robinson, David W., and Town, Caren J. “‘Who Dealt These Cards?’ The Excluded Narrators of Go Down, Moses.” Twentieth Century Literature 37 (1991): 192–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Louis D. Jr., and Jacobs, Robert D., eds. The Southern Renascence: The Literature of the Modern South. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1953.Google Scholar
Saldívar, José David. The Dialectics of Our America: Genealogy, Cultural Critique, and Literary History. Durham: Duke UP, 1991.Google Scholar
Ramón, Saldívar. “Looking for a Master Plan: Faulkner, Paredes, and the Colonial and Postcolonial Subject.” The Cambridge Companion to William Faulkner. Ed. Weinstein, Philip M. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1995. 96–122.Google Scholar
Scott, Joan W. Gender and the Politics of History. New York: Columbia UP, 1988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Lewis P. The Fable of the Southern Writer. Baton Rouge: Louisiana State UP, 1994.Google Scholar
Smith, Jon, and Cohn, Deborah, eds. Look Away: The U.S. South in New World Studies. Durham: Duke UP, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tate, Claudia. Domestic Allegories of Political Desire: The Black Heroine's Text at the Turn of the Century. New York: Oxford UP, 1992.Google Scholar
United States. National Emergency Council. Report on Economic Conditions in the South. Washington: GPO, 1938.Google Scholar
Yaeger, Patricia. Dirt and Desire: Reconstructing Southern Women's Writing, 1930–1990. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar