Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T06:47:30.264Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Spenser's Poetics: The Poem's Two Bodies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

David Lee Miller
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spenser's Faerie Queene is constituted by the fiction of a single transcendental body that is at once spiritual, politic, and aesthetic. The poem's allegorical structure reflects an implicit doctrine of “the poem's two bodies.” Its poetics is an aesthetic theology based on the motifs Kantorowicz discerned in Tudor “political theology”: perfect wholeness, secular perpetuity, and a doctrine of “assimilation.” Analysis of the negative moment in the dialectic of this theology shows allegory to be a strategy for summoning the poem's ideal body into representation as a sublimated negative image of its natural, or written, body. Spenser's image for this ideal body, the veiled hermaphrodite, confounds not only sexual difference but also the difference between metaphor and catachresis, or between mimetic and iconoclastic decorums. No purely mimetic critical reading can do justice to this structure, which demands that a reader “overgo” the text in the production of a historical or political “truth.”

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 101 , Issue 2 , March 1986 , pp. 170 - 185
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Ashbery, John. Houseboat Days: Poems by John Ashbery. New York: Penguin, 1977.Google Scholar
Axton, Marie. The Queen's Two Bodies: Drama and the Elizabethan Succession. London: Royal Historical Soc., 1977.Google Scholar
Bahti, Timothy. “Auerbach's Mimesis: Figurai Structure and Historical Narrative.” Jay and Miller, 124–45.Google Scholar
Barkan, Leonard. Nature's Work of Art: The Human Body as Image of the World. New Haven: Yale UP, 1975.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland. S/Z: An Essay. Trans. Miller, Richard. New York: Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
Boethius. The Consolation of Philosophy. Trans. with introd. and notes by Richard Green. Indianapolis: Bobbs, 1962.Google Scholar
Cain, Thomas H. Praise in The Faerie Queene. Lincoln: Nebraska UP, 1978.Google Scholar
Churchill, Randolph S. The Story of the Coronation. London: Derek Verschoyle, 1953.Google Scholar
Cullen, Patrick. Spenser, Marvell, and Renaissance Pastoral. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1970.10.4159/harvard.9780674431249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeNeef, A. Leigh. Spenser and the Motives of Metaphor. Durham: Duke UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Of Grammatology. Trans. Spivak, Gayatri Chakravorty. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1976.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. Margins of Philosophy. Trans. Bass, Alan. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1982.Google Scholar
Douglas, Mary. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Purity and Taboo. 2nd ed. London: Routledge, 1969.Google Scholar
Durling, Robert. “The Ascent of Mt. Ventoux and the Crisis of Allegory.” Italian Quarterly 18 (1974): 7–28.Google Scholar
Fichter, Andrew. Poets Historical: Dynastic Epic in the Renaissance. New Haven: Yale UP, 1982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, S., and Cleveland, S. E. Body Image and Personality. Princeton: Van Nostrand, 1958.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Angus. Allegory: The Theory of a Symbolic Mode. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1964.Google Scholar
Fletcher, Angus. The Prophetic Moment: An Essay on Spenser. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1971.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. Beyond the Pleasure Principle. Trans. Strachey, James. New York: Bantam, 1959.Google Scholar
Freud, Sigmund. Civilization and Its Discontents. Trans. Strachey, James. New York: Norton, 1961.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan. Endlesse Worke: Spenser and the Structures of Discourse. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1981.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan. James I and the Politics of Literature: Jonson, Shakespeare, Donne, and Their Contemporaries. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen J. Renaissance Self-Fashioning from More to Shakespeare. Chicago: U of Chicago P, 1980.Google Scholar
Guillory, John. Poetic Authority: Spenser, Milton, and Literary History. New York: Columbia UP, 1983.10.7312/guil92340CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halio, Jay L. “The Metaphor of Conception and Elizabethan Theories of Imagination.” Neophilologus 50 (1966): 454–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A. C., ed. Spenser: The Faerie Queene. London: Longman, 1977.Google Scholar
Jay, Gregory S., and Miller, David L. After Strange Texts: The Role of Theory in the Study of Literature. University: U of Alabama P, 1985.Google Scholar
Kantorowicz, Ernst. The King's Two Bodies: A Study of Medieval Political Theology. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1957.Google Scholar
Lacan, Jacques. Ecrits: A Selection. Trans. Sheridan, Alan. New York: Norton, 1977.Google Scholar
McCoy, Richard C. “From Sacred Ritual to Secular Pageantry in Tudor Coronations” and “‘Thou Idol Ceremony’: Elizabeth i, Henry V, and the Rites of the British Monarchy.” Work in progress.Google Scholar
Miller, David Lee. “Authorship, Anonymity, and The Shepheardes Calender” Modern Language Quarterly 40 (1979): 219–36.Google Scholar
Miller, David Lee. “‘The Pleasure of the Text,‘ Two Renaissance Versions.” New Orleans Review 9 (1982): 50–55.Google Scholar
Miller, David Lee. “Spenser's Vocation, Spenser's Career.” ELH 50 (1983): 197–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, Joseph M., Prosser, Michael H., and Benson, Thomas W., eds. Readings in Medieval Rhetoric. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1973.Google Scholar
Montrose, Louis Adrian. “‘The perfecte paterne of a Poete’: The Poetics of Courtship in The Shepheardes Calender.” Texas Studies in Literature and Language 21 (1979): 34–67.Google Scholar
Muller, John P., and Richardson, William J. Lacan and Language: A Reader's Guide to Ecrits. New York: International UP, 1982.Google Scholar
Neale, J. E. Elizabeth I and Her Parliaments. Vol. 1, 1559–81. Vol. 2, 1584–1601. London: Cape, 1953, 1957.Google Scholar
Neale, J. E. Queen Elizabeth. New York: Harcourt, 1931.Google Scholar
Nohrnberg, James. The Analogy of The Faerie Queene. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1976.Google Scholar
O'Connell, Michael. “Authority and the Truth of Experience in Petrarch's ‘Ascent of Mount Ventoux.‘” Philological Quarterly 62 (1983): 507–20.Google Scholar
Ovid. Metamorphoses. Ed. and trans. Frank Justus Miller. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1921.Google Scholar
Paglia, Camille A. “The Apollonian Androgyne and the Faerie Queene.” English Literary Renaissance 9 (1979): 42–63.Google Scholar
Petrarch. “The Ascent of Mt. Ventoux.” De rebus familiaribus 4.1. Letters from Petrarch. Selected and trans. Morris Bishop. Bloomington: Indiana UP, 1966.Google Scholar
Plato. Timaeus. Trans. Jowett, Benjamin. Indianapolis: Bobbs, 1949.Google Scholar
Quilligan, Maureen. Milton's Spenser: The Politics of Reading. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Quint, David. Origin and Originality in Renaissance Literature: Versions of the Source. New Haven: Yale UP, 1983.Google Scholar
Reynolds, L. D., and Wilson, N. G. Scribes and Scholars: A Guide to the Transmission of Greek and Latin Literature. 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon, 1974.Google Scholar
Robbins, Jill. “Petrarch Reading Augustine: ‘The Ascent of Mount Ventoux.‘” Forthcoming in Philological Quarterly.Google Scholar
Robertson, D. W. Jr. A Preface to Chaucer: Studies in Medieval Perspectives. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1953.Google Scholar
Roche, Thomas P. Jr. The Kindly Flame: A Study of the Third and Fourth Books of Spenser's Faerie Queene. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schramm, Percy Ernst. A History of the English Coronation. Trans. Leopold G. Wickham Legg. Oxford: Clarendon, 1937.Google Scholar
Shontz, Franklin C. Perceptual and Cognitive Aspects of Body Experience. New York: Academic, 1969.Google Scholar
Spenser, Edmund. The Complete Poetical Works of Spenser. Ed. R. E. Neil Dodge. Cambridge: Riverside, 1908.Google Scholar
Tuve, Rosemond. Allegorical Imagery: Some Medieval Books and Their Posterity. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, Robin Headlam. Spenser's Faerie Queene and the Cult of Elizabeth. Totowa: Barnes, 1983.Google Scholar
Weston, Jessie L. From Ritual to Romance. New York: Smith, 1920.Google Scholar
Yates, Frances A. “Queen Elizabeth as Astraea.” Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 10 (1947): 27–82. Rpt. in Astraea: The Imperial Theme in the Sixteenth Century. London: Routledge, 1975. 29-88.10.2307/750395CrossRefGoogle Scholar