Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-75dct Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T20:37:57.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stadtwollen: Benjamin's Arcades Project and the Problem of Method

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Katherine Arens
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Walter Benjamin's Arcades Project (Passagen-Werk) is discussed here as an unacknowledged treatise on methodology: a hermeneutics of the modern city that aims to interpret how a city is evidence of an era's Wollen, its drive to manifest its self–understanding in distinctive material forms. My coinage Stadtwollen alludes to an undervalued source for Benjamin: Alois Riegl's Historical Grammar of the Visual Arts (1897–98), which discusses a Kunstwollen, a collective will to art, or a drive leading a culture to create works of art revealing and predicating its self–understanding. This essay sets Riegl's treatise next to Convolute N of the Passagen-Werk and the project's two Exposés (1931 and 1933) in order to illuminate Benjamin's critical–materialist phenomenology and hermeneutics of the city as encompassing new classes of technical–industrial artifacts–a discourse on method sensitive to the political critiques initiated by Marxism but far outdistancing the claims to epistemological critique made by his era's Marxisms.

Type
Research Article
Information
PMLA , Volume 122 , Issue 1: Special Topics Cities , January 2007 , pp. 43 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Barthes, Roland. The Eiffel Tower and Other Mythologies. Trans. Richard Howard. New York: Hill, 1979.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. The Arcades Project. Trans. Howard Eiland and Kevin McLaughlin. Cambridge: Belknap-Harvard UP, 1999.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Bücher, die lebendig geblieben sind.” Benjamin, Gesammelte Schriften, III 169–70.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Gesammelte Schriften, III. Ed. Tiedemann-Bartels, Hella. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1972.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Gesammelte Schriften, V.1. Ed. Tiedemann, Rolf. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1982.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Paris, capitale du XIXème siècle: Exposé.” Benjamin, Gesammelte Schriften, V.1 60–77.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Paris, die Hauptstadt des XIX. Jahrhunderts.” Benjamin, Gesammelte Schriften, V.1 45–59.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “The Rigorous Study of Art: On the First Volume of Kunstwissenschaftliche Forschungen” 1933. Trans. Thomas Y. Levin. October 47 (1988): 84–90. Rpt. in The Vienna School Reader: Politics and Art Historical Method in the 1930s. Ed. Christopher S. Wood. New York: Zone, 2003. 439–51.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Strenge Kunstwissenschaft: Zum ersten Bande der ‘Kunstwissenschaftlichen Forschungen’ (Erste Fassung).” Benjamin, Gesammelte Schriften, III 363–69.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. “Strenge Kunstwissenschaft: Zum ersten Bande der ‘Kunstwissenschaftlichen Forschungen’ (Zweite Fassung).” Gesammelte Schriften, III 369–74.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels. Gesammelte Schriften, 1925. Ed. Rolf Tiedemann and Hermann Schweppenhäuser. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1974. 203–430.Google Scholar
Brewster, Philip, and Buchner, Carl Howard. “Language and Critique: Jürgen Habermas on Walter Benjamin.” New German Critique 17 (1979): 15–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bürger, Peter. “Benjamins Rettende Kritik: Vorüberlegungen zum Entwurf einer kritischen Hermeneutik.” Germanisch-Romanische Monatsschrift 23 (1973): 198–210.Google Scholar
Caygill, Howard. “Walter Benjamin's Concept of Cultural History.” The Cambridge Companion to Walter Benjamin. Ed. Ferris, David S. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2004. 73–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caygill, Howard. Walter Benjamin: The Colour of Experience. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar
Certeau, Michel de. The Practice of Everyday Life. Trans. Steven Rendall. Berkeley: U of California P, 1984.Google Scholar
Derrida, Jacques. “Différance.” “Speech and Phenomena,” and Other Late Essays on Husserl's Theory of Signs. Evanston: Northwestern UP, 1973. 129–60.Google Scholar
Garber, Klaus, and Rehm, Ludger, eds. Global Benjamin: Internationaler Walter-Benjamin-Kongreβ 1992. 3 vols. München: Fink, 1999.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. “Bewußtmachende oder rettende Kritik—die Aktualität Walter Benjamins.” Zur Aktualität Walter Benjamins: Aus Anlaβ des 80. Geburtstags von Walter Benjamin. Ed. Unseld, Siegfried. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1972. 173–223.Google Scholar
Hanssen, Beatrice. “Portrait of Melancholy (Benjamin, Warburg, Panofsky).” Richter 169–88.Google Scholar
Hollier, Denis, ed. The College of Sociology. Trans. Betsy Wing. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1988.Google Scholar
Husserl, Edmund. “Phenomenology.” Critical Theory since 1965. Ed. Adams, Hazard and Searle, Leroy. Tallahassee: UP of Florida, 1986. 758–65.Google Scholar
Kemp, Wolfgang. “Fernbilder: Benjamin und die Kunstwissenschaft.” Links hatte noch alles zu enträtseln … : Walter Benjamin im Kontext. Ed. Lindner, Burckhardt. Frankfurt am Main: Syndikat, 1978. 224–57.Google Scholar
Koepnick, Lutz P. “Medusian Politics: Walter Benjamin and the Aesthetics of Power.” Diss. Stanford U, 1994.Google Scholar
Koepnick, Lutz P. Walter Benjamin and the Aesthetics of Power. Lincoln: U of Nebraska P, 1999.Google Scholar
Lefebvre, Henri. Production of Space. Trans. Donald Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell, 1991.Google Scholar
Levin, Thomas Y. “Walter Benjamin and the Theory of Art History.” October 47 (1988): 77–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCole, John. Walter Benjamin and the Antinomies of Tradition. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Menke, Bettine. “Ornament, Constellation, Flurries.” Richter 260–77.Google Scholar
Müller, Harro. “Einige Anmerkungen zu Benjamins Historismuskritik.” Garber and Rhem 152–60.Google Scholar
Müller, Harro. “Materialismus und Hermeneutik: Zu Benjamins späten theoretischen Schriften.” Studien zur Entwicklung einer materialen Hermeneutik. Ed. Nassen, Ulrich. München: Fink, 1979. 212–33.Google Scholar
Richter, Gerhard, ed. Benjamin's Ghosts: Interventions in Contemporary Literary and Cultural Theory. Stanford: Stanford UP, 2002.Google Scholar
Riegl, Alois. Historical Grammar of the Visual Arts. Trans. Jacqueline E. Jung. New York: Zone, 2004.Google Scholar
Riegl, Alois. Historische Grammatik der bildenden Künste. Ed. Swoboda, Karl M. and Pächt, Otto. Graz: Böhlau, 1966.Google Scholar
Rolleston, James L. “The Politics of Quotation: Walter Benjamin's Arcades Project.” PMLA 104 (1989): 13–27.Google Scholar
Rosen, Philip. “Introduction.” Boundary 2 30.1 (2003): 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schama, Simon. Landscape and Memory. New York: Knopf, 1995.Google Scholar
Schorske, Carl E. Fin de Siècle Vienna: Politics and Culture. New York: Knopf, 1979.Google Scholar
Steinberg, Michael P. “The Collector as Allegorist: Goods, Gods, and the Objects of History.” Walter Benjamin and the Demands of History. Ed. Steinberg. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1996. 88–118.Google Scholar
Witte, Bernd. “Benjamin and Lukács: Historical Notes on the Relationship between Their Political and Aesthetic Theories.” New German Critique 5 (1975): 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Richard. “Critical Theory and Aestheticism: The Case of Benjamin's Passagen-Werk.” The Aesthetics of the Critical Theorists: Studies on Benjamin, Adorno, Marcuse, and Habermas. Ed. Roblin, Ronald. Lewiston: Mellen, 1990. 188–205.Google Scholar
Wolin, Richard. “From Messianism to Materialism: The Later Aesthetics of Walter Benjamin.” New German Critique 22 (1981): 81–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Richard. Walter Benjamin: An Aesthetic of Redemption. New York: Columbia UP, 1982.Google Scholar