Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T04:55:20.266Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Where Are the Missing Contents? (Post)Modernism, Gender, and the Canon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 October 2020

Ellen G. Friedman
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Jean-François Lyotard has argued that the master narratives sustaining Western civilization in the past have been delegitimated and can no longer be presented. Although a sense of loss for these “missing contents” marks modernist and postmodernist literature, this sense seems more evident in texts written by men than in texts written by women. Women's texts that convey these missing contents do not look backward toward past master narratives. Rather, what is missing is the “not yet presented,” that which has not yet come into range. This pattern of bifurcation in modernism and postmodernism suggests that male texts are more readily adopted into the canon than female texts are because their nostalgic stance toward the past binds them, as female texts generally are not bound, to the long reach of the male Western narrative tradition. (EGF)

Type
Cluster: Figuring Gender
Information
PMLA , Volume 108 , Issue 2 , March 1993 , pp. 240 - 252
Copyright
Copyright © Modern Language Association of America, 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Works Cited

Acker, Kathy Don Quixote. New York: Grove, 1986.Google Scholar
Ashbery, John “Up from the Underground.” Rev. of The Collected Works of Jane Bowles. New York Times Book Review 29 Jan. 1967: 5+.Google Scholar
Barnes, Djuna Nightwood. 1937. New York: New Directions, 1961.Google Scholar
Barthelme, Donald The Dead Father. New York: Farrar, 1975.Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean “Simulacra and Simulations.” Selected Writings. By Baudrillard. Ed. Mark Poster. Stanford: Stanford UP, 1988. 166–16.Google Scholar
Borges, Jorge Luis “Pierre Menard, Author of Don Quixote.” Ficciones. 1956. Trans. Anthony Bonner. New York: Grove, 1962. 45–55.Google Scholar
Bowles, Jane Two Serious Ladies. 1943. My Sister's Hand in Mine: An Expanded Edition of the Collected Works of Jane Bowles. New York: Ecco, 1978. 1–201.Google Scholar
Bowles, Paul “A Distant Episode.” Collected Stories: 1939–1976. Santa Barbara: Black Sparrow, 1981. 39–50.Google Scholar
Cixous, Hélène, and Clément, Catherine The Newly Born Woman. Trans. Wing, Betsy. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1986.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix Anti-Oedipus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. 1972. Trans. Robert Hurley, Mark Seem, and Helen R. Lane. New York: Viking, 1977.Google Scholar
Deleuze, Gilles, and Guattari, Félix A Thousand Plateaus. Trans. Massumi, Brian. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1987.Google Scholar
Dillon, Millicent “Jane Bowles: Experiment as Character.” Friedman and Fuchs, Breaking 140–14.Google Scholar
Dillon, Millicent A Little Original Sin: The Life and Work of Jane Bowles. New York: Holt, 1981.Google Scholar
Dix, Douglas Shields “Kathy Acker's Don Quixote: Nomad Writing.” Review of Contemporary Fiction 9.3 (1989): 56–62.Google Scholar
Doane, Janice, and Hodges, Devon Nostalgia and Sexual Difference: The Resistance to Contemporary Feminism. New York: Methuen, 1987.Google Scholar
DuPlessis, Rachel. “Woolfenstein.” Friedman and Fuchs, Breaking 99–114.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S Four Quartets. Collected Poems 173–209.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S T. S. Eliot: Collected Poems, 1909–1962. New York: Harcourt, 1963.Google Scholar
Eliot, T. S The Waste Land. Collected Poems 51–76.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel Introduction. Deleuze and Guattari, Anti-Oedipus xv–xxiv.Google Scholar
Friedman, Ellen G. “‘Now Eat Your Mind’: An Introduction to the Works of Kathy Acker.” Review of Contemporary Fiction 9.3 (1989): 37–49.Google Scholar
Friedman, Ellen G., and Fuchs, Miriam, eds Breaking the Sequence: Women's Experimental Fiction. Princeton: Princeton UP, 1989.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, Ellen G., and Fuchs, Miriam, eds “Contexts and Continuities: An Introduction to Women's Experimental Fiction in English.” Friedman and Fuchs, Breaking 3–51.Google Scholar
Fuss, Diana J “‘Essentially Speaking’: Luce Irigaray's Language of Essence.” Hypatia 3 (1989): 62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HD [Hilda Doolittle]. Palimpsest. 1926. Rev. ed. Carbon-dale: Southern Illinois UP, 1968.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric Introduction. Lyotard, Postmodern Condition vii–xxii.Google Scholar
Jameson, Fredric “Postmodernism; or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism.” New Left Review 146 (1984): 53–94.Google Scholar
Jardine, Alice A Gynesis: Configurations of Woman and Modernity. Ithaca: Cornell UP, 1985.Google Scholar
Kaplan, E. Ann “Feminism/Oedipus/Postmodernism: The Case of MTV.” Postmodernism and Its Discontents. Ed. Kaplan. New York: Verso, 1988. 30–44.Google Scholar
Levine, Sherrie “Art in the (Re)Making.” Art News May 1986: 96–97.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François “One Thing at Stake in Women's Struggles.” The Lyotard Reader. Ed. Benjamin, Andrew. Cambridge: Blackwell, 1989. 111–11.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. 1979. Trans. Geoff Bennington and Brian Massumi. Theory and History of Literature 10. Minneapolis: U of Minnesota P, 1984.Google Scholar
Nin, Anaïs The Diary of Anaïs Nin. Ed. Stuhlmann, Gunther. 7 vols. New York: Harcourt, 1966–80.Google Scholar
Nin, Anaïs House of Incest. 1936. Chicago: Swallow, 1958.Google Scholar
Nin, Anaïs A Spy in the House of Love. 1954. New York: Bantam, 1968.Google Scholar
Oates, Joyce Carol Because It Is Bitter, and Because It Is My Heart. New York: Dutton, 1990.Google Scholar
Owens, Craig “The Discourse of Others: Feminists and Postmodernism.” The Anti-aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture. Ed. Foster, Hal. Port Townsend: Bay, 1983. 57–77.Google Scholar
Pynchon, Thomas Vineland. New York: Little, 1990.Google Scholar
Ravits, Martha “Extending the American Range: Marilynne Robinson's Housekeeping.” American Literature 61 (1989): 644–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Lillian “Canon Fathers and Myth Universe.” New Literary History 19 (1987): 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Marilynne Housekeeping. 1981. New York: Bantam, 1982.Google Scholar
Spencer, Sharon “The Music of the Womb: Anaïs Nin's ‘Feminine Writing.‘” Friedman and Fuchs, Breaking 161–16.Google Scholar
Stein, Gertrude “Composition as Explanation.” Selected Writings 511–51.Google Scholar
Stein, Gertrude The Mother of Us All. Selected Operas and Plays of Gertrude Stein. Ed. Brinnin, John Malcolm. Pittsburgh: U of Pittsburgh P, 1970. 159–202.Google Scholar
Stein, Gertrude “Patriarchal Poetry.” The Yale Gertrude Stein. Ed. Kostelanetz, Richard. New Haven: Yale UP, 1980. 106–10.Google Scholar
Stein, Gertrude “Rooms.” Tender Buttons. Selected Writings 498–509.Google Scholar
Stein, Gertrude Selected Writings of Gertrude Stein. Ed. Vechten, Carl Van. New York: Vintage-Random, 1972.Google Scholar
Suleiman, Susan Rubin Subversive Intent: Gender, Politics, and the Avant-Garde. Cambridge: Harvard UP, 1990.Google Scholar
Walton, Edith “Fantastic Duo.” Rev. of Two Serious Ladies, by Jane Bowles. New York Times Book Review 9 May 1943: 14.Google Scholar
Waugh, Patricia Feminine Fictions: Revisiting the Postmodern. New York: Routledge, 1989.Google Scholar
Winnett, Susan “Coming Unstrung: Women, Men, Narrative, and Principles of Pleasure.” PMLA 105 (1990): 505–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar