Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-06T03:01:15.463Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Hostile Sexism and Abortion Attitudes in Contemporary American Public Opinion

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2023

Anne Cizmar Open the ORCID record for Anne Cizmar [Opens in a new window]  and
Kerem Ozan Kalkan Open the ORCID record for Kerem Ozan Kalkan [Opens in a new window]
Anne Cizmar*
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY, USA
Kerem Ozan Kalkan
Affiliation:
Department of Government, Eastern Kentucky University, Richmond, KY, USA
*
Corresponding author: Anne Cizmar; Email: anne.cizmar@eku.edu
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Abortion is a divisive issue in American politics. Studies analyzing attitudes toward abortion have found that abortion attitudes are relatively stable over time compared with attitudes on other issues and that religiosity and partisanship are key factors influencing abortion attitudes. Recent research has also found a role for benevolent sexism in abortion attitudes. This article expands on the literature and examines the role of hostile sexism—dislike toward women who are seen as usurping men’s authority—in attitudes about abortion in the United States. Using data from the 2012, 2016, and 2020 American National Election Studies, we find that hostile sexism is significantly related to abortion attitudes, even after controlling for theoretically relevant covariates such as partisanship, ideology, religiosity, and sociodemographic variables. As hostile sexism increases, people are more likely to express pro-life attitudes rather than pro-choice attitudes.

Keywords

Abortion attitudeshostile sexismpublic opinion
Type
Research Article
Information
Politics & Gender , Volume 19 , Issue 4 , December 2023 , pp. 1134 - 1155
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Women, Gender, and Politics Research Section of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, Greg D. 1997. “Abortion: Evidence of Issue Evolution.” American Journal of Political Science 41 (3): 718–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alvarez, R. Michael, and Brehm, John. 1995. “It’s Abortion, Stupid: Policy Voting in the 1992 Presidential Election.” American Journal of Political Science 39 (4): 1055–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2002. “Direct Democracy and the Link between Public Opinion and State Abortion Policy.” State Politics & Policy Quarterly 2 (4): 372–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ballard, Jamie. 2022. “Which Religious Groups’ Members are Most Likely to Identify as Pro- Choice?” YouGov, May 13. https://today.yougov.com/topics/politics/articles-reports/2022/05/13/which-religious-groups-members-abortion-poll (accessed December 31, 2022).Google Scholar
Barkan, Steven E. 2014. “Gender and Abortion Attitudes: Religiosity as a Suppressor Variable.” Public Opinion Quarterly 78 (4): 940–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beauregard, Katrine. 2021. “Sexism and the Australian Voter: How Sexist Attitudes Influenced Vote Choice in the 2019 Federal Election.” Australian Journal of Political Science 56 (3): 298–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blake, Judith. 1971. “Abortion and Public Opinion: The 1960–1970 Decade.” Science 171 (3971): 540–49.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron, A. Colin, and Trivedi, Pravin K.. 2022. Microeconometrics Using Stata. 2nd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Campbell, Bernadette, Schellenberg, E. Glenn, and Senn, Charlene Y.. 1997. “Evaluating Measures of Contemporary Sexism.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 21 (1): 89–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., Gerrity, Jessica C., and Wagner, Michael W.. 2010. “How Abortion Became a Partisan Issue: Media Coverage of the Interest Group-Political Party Connection.” Politics & Policy 38 (6): 1135–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmines, Edward G., and Stimson, James A.. 1989. Issue Evolution: Race and the Transformation of American Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carsey, Thomas M., and Layman, Geoffrey C.. 2006. “Changing Sides or Changing Minds? Party Identification and Policy Preferences in the American Electorate.” American Journal of Political Science 50 (2): 464–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cassese, Erin C., and Barnes, Tiffany D.. 2018. “Reconciling Sexism and Women’s Support for Republican Candidates: A Look at Gender, Class, and Whiteness in the 2012 and 2016 Presidential Races.” Political Behavior 41 (3): 677–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Combs, Michael W., and Welch, Susan. 1982. “Blacks, Whites, and Attitudes toward Abortion.” Public Opinion Quarterly 46 (4): 510–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, Rachel A., and Fiske, Susan T.. 2019. “Not Minding the Gap: How Hostile Sexism Encourages Choice Explanations for the Gender Income Gap.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 43 (1): 22–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, Philip E., and Markus, Gregory B.. 1979. “Plus ça Change: The New CPS Election Study Panel.” American Political Science Review 73 (1): 32–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denbow, Jennifer M. 2015. Governed through Choice: Autonomy, Technology, and the Politics of Reproduction. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doan, Alesha E., and Schwarz, Corinne. 2020. “Father Knows Best: ‘Protecting’ Women through State Surveillance and Social Control in Anti-abortion Policy.” Politics & Policy 48 (1): 6–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donley, Greer, and Lens, Jill Wieber. 2021. “Second-Trimester Abortion Dangertalk.” Boston College Law Review 62 (7): 2145–2208.Google Scholar
Glick, Peter, and Fiske, Susan T.. 1996. “The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory: Differentiating Hostile and Benevolent Sexism.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 70 (3): 491–512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, Peter, and Fiske, Susan T.. 2001. “An Ambivalent Alliance: Hostile and Benevolent Sexism as Complementary Justifications for Gender Inequality.” American Psychologist 56 (2): 109–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gothreau, Claire, Arceneaux, Kevin, and Friesen, Amanda. 2022. “Hostile, Benevolent, Implicit: How Different Shades of Sexism Impact Gendered Policy Attitudes.” Frontiers in Political Science 4: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grollman, Eric Anthony. 2017. “Sexual Orientation Differences in Attitudes about Sexuality, Race, and Gender.” Social Science Research 61: 126–41.Google Scholar
Grollman, Eric Anthony. 2019. “Americans’ Gender Attitudes at the Intersection of Sexual Orientation and Gender.” Journal of Homosexuality 66 (2): 141–72.Google ScholarPubMed
Hall, Elaine J., and Ferree, Myra Marx. 1986. “Race Differences in Abortion Attitudes.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50 (2): 193–207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hanmer, Michael J., and Kalkan, Kerem Ozan. 2013. “Behind the Curve: Clarifying the Best Approach to Calculating Predicted Probabilities and Marginal Effects from Limited Dependent Variable Models.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 263–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holman, Mirya, Podrazik, Erica, and Mohamed, Heather Silber. 2020. “Choosing Choice: How Gender and Religiosity Shape Abortion Attitudes among Latinos.” Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics 5 (2): 384–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Yanshu, Davies, Paul G., Sibley, Chris G., and Osborne, Danny. 2016. “Benevolent Sexism, Attitudes toward Motherhood, and Reproductive Rights: A Multi-study Longitudinal Examination of Abortion Attitudes.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 42 (7): 970–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, Yanshu, Sibley, Chris G., and Osborne, Danny. 2020. “Breast Is Best, but Where? Hostile Sexism Underlies Men’s Opposition to Breastfeeding in Public.” Journal of Social Issues 76 (2): 219–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelen, Ted G. 1988. “Changes in the Attitudinal Correlations of Opposition to Abortion, 1977- 1985.” Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 27 (2): 211–28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jelen, Ted G., and Wilcox, Clyde. 2003. “Causes and Consequences of Public Attitudes toward Abortion: A Review and Research Agenda.” Political Research Quarterly 56 (4): 489–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kam, Cindy D., and Allison, M. N. Archer. 2021. “Mobilizing and Demobilizing: Modern Sexism and Turnout in the #MeToo Era.” Public Opinion Quarterly 85 (1): 172–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Killian, Mitchell, and Wilcox, Clyde. 2008. “Do Abortion Attitudes Lead to Party Switching?” Political Research Quarterly 61 (4): 561–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Layman, Geoffrey C. 2001. The Great Divide: Religious and Cultural Conflict in American Party Politics. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Levendusky, Matthew. 2009. The Partisan Sort: How Liberals Became Democrats and Conservatives Became Republicans. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebertz, Scott, and Bunch, Jaclyn. 2021. “Backfiring Frames: Abortion Politics, Religion, and Attitude Resistance.” Politics and Religion 14 (3): 403–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lizotte, Mary-Kate. 2015. “The Abortion Attitudes Paradox: Model Specification and Gender Differences.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 36 (1): 22–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, J. Scott, and Freese, Jeremy. 2014. Regression Models for Categorical Dependent Variables Using Stata. 3rd ed. College Station, TX: Stata Press.Google Scholar
Luker, Kristin. 1985. Abortion and the Politics of Motherhood. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
McThomas, Mary, and Tesler, Michael. 2016. “The Growing Influence of Gender Attitudes on Public Support for Hillary Clinton, 2008–2012.” Politics & Gender 12 (1): 28–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mooney, Christopher Z., and Schuldt, Richard G.. 2008. “Does Morality Policy Exist? Testing a Basic Assumption.” Policy Studies Journal 36 (2): 199–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Amy O., Sutton, Robbie M., Douglas, Karen M., and McClellan, Leigh M.. 2011. “Ambivalent Sexism and the ‘Do’s and ‘Don’t’s of Pregnancy: Examining Attitudes toward Proscriptions and the Women who Flout Them.” Personality and Individual Differences 51 (7): 812–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborne, Danny, Huang, Yanshu, Overall, Nickola C., Sutton, Robbie M., Petterson, Aino, Douglas, Karen M., Davies, Paul G., and Sibley, Chris G.. 2022. “Abortion Attitudes: An Overview of Demographic and Ideological Differences.” Political Psychology 43 (S1): 29–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petterson, Aino, and Sutton, Robbie M.. 2018. “Sexist Ideology and Endorsement of Men’s Control Over Women’s Decisions in Reproductive Health.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 42 (2): 235–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pew Research Center. 2022. “Public Opinion on Abortion.” May 17. https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/fact-sheet/public-opinion-on-abortion/ (accessed December 28, 2022).Google Scholar
Roberti, Amanda. 2021. “‘Women Deserve Better’: The Use of the Pro-woman Frame in Anti- abortion Policies in U.S. States.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 42 (3): 207–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Melody. 2011. “Pro-life, Pro-woman? Frame Extension in the American Antiabortion Movement.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 32 (1): 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Russell, Brenda L., and Trigg, Kristin Y.. 2004. “Tolerance of Sexual Harassment: An Examination of Gender Differences, Ambivalent Sexism, Social Dominance, and Gender Roles.” Sex Roles 50 (7): 565–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, Kira. 2002. Democrats, Republicans, and the Politics of Women’s Place. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffner, Brian F. 2022. “Optimizing the Measurement of Sexism in Political Surveys.” Political Analysis 30 (3): 364–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, Ronnee. 2002. “Injecting a Woman’s Voice: Conservative Women’s Organizations, Gender Consciousness, and the Expression of Women’s Policy Preferences.” Sex Roles 47: 331–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schreiber, Ronnee. 2008. Righting Feminism: Conservative Women and American Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. 2007. “The New Politics of Abortion: An Equality Analysis of Woman-Protective Abortion Restrictions.” University of Illinois Law Review 2007 (3): 991–1054.Google Scholar
Small, Kenneth A., and Hsiao, Cheng. 1985. “Multinomial Logit Specification Tests.” International Economic Review 26 (3): 619–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swank, Eric. 2021. “The Gender Conservatism of Pro-life Activists.” Journal of Women, Politics & Policy 42 (2): 124–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swim, Janet K., and Campbell, Bernadette. 2003. “Sexism: Attitudes, Beliefs, and Behaviors.” In Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Intergroup Processes, eds. Brown, Rupert and Gaertner, Sam. Malden, MA: John Wiley & Sons, 218–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swim, Janet K., and Cohen, Laurie L.. 1997. “Overt, Covert, and Subtle Sexism: A Comparison between the Attitudes toward Women and Modern Sexism Scales.” Psychology of Women Quarterly 21 (1): 103–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedrow, Lucky M. and Mahoney, E. R.. 1979. “Trends in Attitudes toward Abortion: 1972–1976.” Public Opinion Quarterly 43 (2): 181–89.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomae, Manuela, and Houston, Diane M.. 2016. “The Impact of Gender Ideologies on Men’s and Women’s Desire for a Traditional or Non-Traditional Partner.” Personality and Individual Differences 95: 152–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Travaglia, Lucy K., Overall, Nickola C., and Sibley, Chris G.. 2009. “Benevolent and Hostile Sexism and Preferences for Romantic Partners.” Personality and Individual Differences 47 (6): 599–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, Nicholas A., Wayne, Carly, and Oceno, Marzia. 2018. “Mobilizing Sexism: The Interaction of Emotion and Gender Attitudes in the 2016 US Presidential Election.” Public Opinion Quarterly 82 (S1): 799–821.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, Nicholas J. G. 2022. “Hostile Sexism, Benevolent Sexism, and American Elections.” Politics & Gender. Published online June 8. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X22000010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Worthen, Meredith G. F. 2020. “‘All the Gays Are Liberal?’ Sexuality and Gender Gaps in Political Perspectives among Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Mostly Heterosexual, and Heterosexual College Students in the Southern USA.” Sexuality Research and Social Policy 17 (1): 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Cizmar and Kalkan supplementary material

Online Appendix
Download Cizmar and Kalkan supplementary material(File)
File 85.2 KB