Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T10:55:48.926Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

61. Can Melatonin Improve Adaptation To Night Shift? A Pilot Study Using an Urban EMS System

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Michael Tremea
Affiliation:
Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Butterworth Hospital, and the Kent County EMS System, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Mark James
Affiliation:
Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Butterworth Hospital, and the Kent County EMS System, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Jeffrey Jones
Affiliation:
Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Butterworth Hospital, and the Kent County EMS System, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Jon Krohmer
Affiliation:
Emergency Medicine Residency Program, Butterworth Hospital, and the Kent County EMS System, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Purpose: To determine whether melatonin (N-acetyl-5-methoxytryptamine) is effective in helping prehospital personnel working consecutive night shifts reset their biological clock and minimize circadian rhythm disruption.

Methods: A double-blinded, randomized, cross-over study was performed using 12 paramedic volunteers. Paramedics were working a span of consecutive night (2300-0700) shifts and received either a melatonin capsule (6 mg) or placebo to be taken prior to each of the consecutive day sleeps. Each participants completed a total of four spans of consecutive night shifts (2-melatonin, 2-placebo). Collected data included daily sleep diaries, quantification of alcohol/caffeine consumed, and possible drug side-effects. Assessment of job performance, mood and alertness were measured every day using 10-cm visual analog scales (VAS).

Results: Analysis of sleep diaries demonstrated no significant difference (p >0.05) between the two treatments in respect to mean sleep latency (melatonin = 15.4 min. vs. placebo = 14.6 min), mean sleep duration (melatonin = 6.7 hrs. vs. placebo = 6.9 hrs), or subjectively rated sleep quality (melatonin = 5.8 VAS vs placebo = 5.6 VAS). Similarly, no significant benefits were noted between the mean VAS scores for daily job performance, mood and alertness. Adverse effects were rare, one patient taking melatonin reported a prolonged sedative effect.

Conclusion: Despite widespread belief in the benefits of melatonin as a hypnotic agent, no clinical benefits were noted in terms of daytime sleep or job performance in paramedics working consecutive night shifts.

Type
Oral Presentations
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1996