Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T17:19:07.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Casualty Collection in Mass-Casualty Incidents: A Better Method for Finding Proverbial Needles in a Haystack

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Kristina E. Knotts ,
Stuart Etengoff ,
Kimberly Barber  and
Ina J. Golden
Kristina E. Knotts
Affiliation:
Genesys Regional Medical Center Grand Blanc, Michigan, USA
Stuart Etengoff
Affiliation:
Genesys Regional Medical Center Grand Blanc, Michigan, USA
Kimberly Barber
Affiliation:
Genesys Regional Medical Center Grand Blanc, Michigan, USA
Ina J. Golden*
Affiliation:
Genesys Regional Medical Center Grand Blanc, Michigan, USA
*
Ina J. Golden, RN, BSN, CEN, EMT-P Genesys Regional Medical Center One Genesys ParkwayGrand Blanc, MI 48439 USA E-mail: igolden@genesys.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Introduction:

Mass-casualty incidents (MCIs) are on the rise. The ability to locate, identify, and triage patients quickly and efficiently results in better patient outcomes. Poor lighting due to time of day, inclement weather, and power outages can make locating patients difficult. Efficient methods of locating patients allow for quicker transport to definitive care.

Objective:

The objective of this study was to evaluate the methods currently used in mass-casualty collection, and to determine whether the use of the Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment (START) triage tag system can be improved by using easily discernable tags (glow sticks) in conjunction with the standard triage tags.

Methods:

Numerous drills were performed utilizing the START triage method. In Trial A, patients were identified with the triage tags only. In Trial B, patients were identified using triage tags and glow sticks. Four rounds of triage drills were performed in low ambient light for each Trial, and the differences in casualty collection times were compared.

Results:

Casualty relocation and collection times were considerably shorter in the trials that utilized both the glow sticks and triage tags. An average of 2.58 minutes (31.75%) were saved during the casualty collections. In addition, fewer patient errors occurred during the trials in which the glow sticks were used. Between the four rounds, an average of four patient errors occurred during the trials that utilized the triage tags. However, there was an average of only one patient error for the drills when participants utilized both the triage tags and the glow sticks.

Conclusions:

The use of the highly visible glow sticks, in conjunction with the START triage tags, allowed for more rapid and accurate casualty collection in suboptimal lighting. The use of the glow sticks made it easier to relocate previously triaged patients and arrange for expeditious transport to definitive care. In addition, the glow sticks reduced the number of patient errors. Most importantly, there was a significant reduction in the number of patients that initially were triaged via the START method, but were overlooked during casualty collection and transport.

Keywords

casualty collectionglow sticksmass-casualty incident (MCI)triage
Type
Brief Report
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 21 , Issue 6 , December 2006 , pp. 459 - 464
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Bledose, BE, Porter, RS, Cherry, RA: Brady Paramedic Care, Volume 5, 2nd Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc., 2006.Google Scholar
2.American College of Surgeons: Advanced Trauma Life Support. ®Instructor Manual. 6th Ed, Chicago, IL, USA 1977.Google Scholar
3.Simon, R, Teperman, S: The World Trade Center attack. Lessons for disaster management. Crit Care 2001;5(6):318–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4.Chan, TC, Killeen, J, Griswold, W, Lenert, L: Information technology and emergency medical care during disasters. Acad Emer Med 2004;11:1229–1236.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed