Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T21:55:34.938Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors Associated with Symptom-to-Door Delay in Patients with ST-Segment Myocardial Infarction: A Systematic Review

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 July 2023

Xiuyan Lu
Affiliation:
Cardiology Department, Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
Wei Xia
Affiliation:
Cardiology Department, Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
Xinru Wang
Affiliation:
Nursing Department, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
Fangyu Xie*
Affiliation:
Cardiology Department, Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
Xiujie Sun*
Affiliation:
Nursing Department, Qingdao Hospital, University of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences (Qingdao Municipal Hospital), Qingdao, Shandong Province, China
*
Correspondence: Fangyu Xie E-mail: 18661678225@163.com Xiujie Sun E-mail: xjsun5818@qq.com
Correspondence: Fangyu Xie E-mail: 18661678225@163.com Xiujie Sun E-mail: xjsun5818@qq.com

Abstract

Background:

Decreasing symptom-to-door (S2D) delay is of vital importance for reducing morbidity and mortality in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). The factors associated with S2D delay in STEMI patients have not been well-characterized.

Objectives:

The aim of this study was to identify factors associated with S2D delay in patients with STEMI.

Methods:

The PubMed, CINAHL, and Embase databases were searched for data. References from the selected articles and relevant background papers were also manually searched to identify additional eligible studies. The included articles were reviewed and assessed for risk of bias. The level of evidence for each identified factor was evaluated using a semiquantitative synthesis.

Results:

Twelve (12) papers were included in the review. Factors associated with S2D delay were complex and could be divided into sociodemographic, clinical history, and onset characteristics. The level of evidence regarding female sex and diabetes was strong, and the evidence was moderate regarding older age, smoking, history of hypertension, self-transport, or referral.

Conclusions:

Female sex, older age, previous diabetes, previous hypertension, smoking, and self-transport are all strong or moderate risk factors for S2D time delay in patients with ST-segment myocardial infarction. More efforts should be made to educate at-risk populations concerning symptoms of STEMI and the importance of seeking early medical assistance.

Type
Systematic Review
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kim, HL. It is time to focus on pre-hospital delays in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Korean J Intern Med. 2020;35(1):6061.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bessonov, IS, Kuznetsov, VA, Gorbatenko, EA, et al. Influence of total ischemic time on clinical outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Kardiologiia. 2021;61(2):4046.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Gara, PT, Kushner, FG, Ascheim, DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61:e78140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fazel, R, Joseph, TI, Sankardas, MA, et al. Comparison of reperfusion strategies for ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: a multivariate network meta-analysis. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020;9(12):e015186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sari, I, Acar, Z, Ozer, O, et al. Factors associated with prolonged prehospital delay in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2008;36(3):156162.Google ScholarPubMed
Momeni, M, Salari, A, Shafighnia, S, et al. Factors influencing pre-hospital delay among patients with acute myocardial infarction in Iran. Chin Med J (Engl). 2012;125(19):34043409.Google ScholarPubMed
Peng, YG, Feng, JJ, Guo, LF, et al. Factors associated with prehospital delay in patients with ST-segment elevation acute myocardial infarction in China. Am J Emerg Med. 2014;32(4):349355.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wah, W, Pek, PP, Ho, AF, et al. Symptom-to-door delay among patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Singapore. Emerg Med Australas. 2017;29(1):2432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Poorhosseini, H, Saadat, M, Salarifar, M, et al. Prehospital delay and its contributing factors in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction; a cross sectional study. Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2019;7(1):e29.Google ScholarPubMed
Park, YH, Kang, GH, Song, BG, et al. Factors related to prehospital time delay in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. J Korean Med Sci. 2012;27(8):864869.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hafiz, AM, Naidu, SS, DeLeon, J, et al. Impact of first contact on symptom onset-to-door time in patients presenting for primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31(6):922927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, HS, Lee, KS, Eun, SJ, et al. Gender differences in factors related to prehospital delay in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Yonsei Med J. 2017;58(4):710719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grammatopoulos, T, Hunter, JWS, Munn, Z, et al. Reporting quality and risk of bias in JBI systematic reviews evaluating the effectiveness of interventions: a methodological review protocol. JBI Evid Synth. 2023;21(3):584591.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wibring, K, Herlitz, J, Christensson, L, et al. Prehospital factors associated with an acute life-threatening condition in non-traumatic chest pain patients - a systematic review. Int J Cardiol. 2016;219:373379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Austin, D, Yan, AT, Spratt, JC, et al. Patient characteristics associated with self-presentation, treatment delay and survival following primary percutaneous coronary intervention. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2014;3(3):214222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, RA, Shantsila, E, Varma, C, et al. Symptom-to-door times in patients presenting with ST elevation myocardial infarction--do ethnic or gender differences exist? QJM. 2016;109(3):175180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Margolis, G, Letourneau-Shesaf, S, Khoury, S, et al. Trends and predictors of prehospital delay in patients undergoing primary coronary intervention. Coron Artery Dis. 2018;29(5):373377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weininger, D, Cordova, JP, Wilson, E, et al. Delays to hospital presentation in women and men with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a multi-center analysis of patients hospitalized in New York City. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2022;18:19.10.2147/TCRM.S335219CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moher, D, Pham, B, Lawson, ML, et al. The inclusion of reports of randomized trials published in languages other than English in systematic reviews. Health Technol Assess. 2003;7:177.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, MC, Syndergaard, T, Bowler, J, et al. A systematic review of factors predicting door to balloon time in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with percutaneous intervention. Int J Cardiol. 2012;157(1):823.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sofi, F, Dinu, M, Reboldi, G, et al. Worldwide differences of hospitalization for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction during COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2022;347:8996.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Egger, M, Dickerson, K, Smith, GD. Problems and Limitations in Conducting Systematic Reviews. In: Egger M, Smith GD, Altman DG, (eds). Systematic Reviews in Health Care: Meta-Analysis in Context. London, UK: BMJ Publishing Group; 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Lu et al. supplementary material

Lu et al. supplementary material

Download Lu et al. supplementary material(File)
File 31.7 KB