Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nr4z6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T20:14:35.490Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

In-Field Comparison between Fully Automatic and Semi-Automatic Defibrillators

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 June 2012

Joseph J. Bocka  and
Robert Swor
Joseph J. Bocka*
Affiliation:
Attending in Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA Attending in Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Troy, Michigan, USA
Robert Swor
Affiliation:
Attending in Emergency Medicine, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA Clinical Instructor, Division of EHS, Department of Surgery, University of Michigan School of Medicine
*
Capital Emergency Associates, 575 Main St. Laurel, MD, 20707USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this clinical study was to compare the prehospital use of fully automatic defibrillators versus semi-automatic defibrillators.

Methods:

Fully and semi-automatic defibrillator use by EMTs in neighboring communities was compared.

Results:

Both programs had similar response times, age and gender distribution, proportion of witnessed arrests, and proportion of patients found initially with ventricular fibrillation (VF). The time-to-shock from proper lead placement was shorter when the fully automatic defibrillator was used (16.6 vs. 44.3 seconds; p<.001) and the survival to hospital discharge rate was greater (26% vs. 0%; p=.O4). The semi-automatic defibrillators were more sensitive in detecting VF than were the fully automatic devices.

Conclusions:

These data support the need for further comparison of the efficacy and effectiveness of semi- and fully automatic, external defibrillators.

Type
Original Research
Information
Prehospital and Disaster Medicine , Volume 6 , Issue 4 , December 1991 , pp. 415 - 420
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Eisenberg, MS, Copass, MK, Hallstrom, A et al. : Treatment of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests with rapid defibrillation by emergency medical technicians. N Engl J Med 1980;302:1379–1383.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2. Weaver, WD, Copass, MK, Cobb, L: Improved neurologic recovery and survival after early defibrillation. Circulation 1984;69:943–948.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Eisenberg, MS, Hallstrom, AP, Copass, MK et al. : Treatment of ventricular fibrillation: emergency medical technician defibrillation and paramedic services. JAMA 1984;251:1723–1726.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Cummins, RO, Eisenberg, MS, Graves, JR et al. : Automatic external defibrillators (AEDs) used by emergency medical technicians: A controlled clinical trial. Circulation 1985;4:111–118.Google Scholar
5. Cummins, RO, Eisenberg, MS, Litwin, PE et al. : Automatic external defibrillators used by emergency medical technicians. JAMA 1987;257:1605–1610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Stults, KR, Brown, DD, Kerber, RE: Efficacy of an automated external defibrillator in the management of out of hospital cardiac arrest: Validation of the diagnostic algorithm and initial clinical experience in a rural environment. Circulation 1986;73:701–709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Stults, KR, Brown, DD, Schug, VL, Bean, JA: Pre-hospital defibrillation performed by emergency medical technicians in rural communities. N Engl J Med 1984;310:219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Bachman, JW, McDonald, GS, O'Brien, PC: A Study of out of hospital cardiac arrests in northeastern Minnesota. JAMA 1986;256:477–483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Heber, M: Out of hospital cardiac arrest using the “Heart Aid,” an automated external defibrillator-pacemaker. Intern J Cardiol 1983;3:456–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Weaver, WD, Copass, MK, Hill, DL et al. : Cardiac arrest treated with a new automatic external defibrillator by out of hospital first responders. Amer J Cardiol 1986;57:1017–1021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11. Weaver, WD, Hill, D, Fahrenbruch, CE et al. : Use of the automatic external defibrillator in the management of out of hospital cardiac arrest. N Engl J Med 1988;319:661–666.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Vukov, LF, White, RD, Bachman, JW, O'Brien, PC: New perspectives on rural EMT defibrillation. Ann Emerg Med 1988;17:318–321.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13. Ventriglia, WJ, Hamilton, GC: Electrical interventions in cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Defibrillation. Emerg Med Clinics N Amer 1983;I:515–534.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Eisenberg, M, Bergner, L, Hallstrom, A: Paramedic programs and out of hospital cardiac arrest: I. Factors associated with successful resuscitation. Amer J Publ Health 1979;69:30–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15. Eisenberg, MS, Cummins, RO, Hallstrom, AP: Defibrillation by emergency medical technicians. Crit Care Med 1985;13:921–922.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16. Papa, FJ: Time to defibrillation: A controlled laboratory study comparing 3 automatic and semi-automatic defibrillators. J Emerg Med 1989;7:163–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Cummins, RO, Eisenberg, M, Bergner, L, Murray, JA: Sensitivity, accuracy, and safety of an automatic external defibrillator. Lancet 1984;4:318–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar