Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T11:38:28.338Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Swine Flu Emergency Department: The Relationship Between Media Attention for the Swine Flu and Registrations in an Emergency Medicine Unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 March 2014

Sara Nelissen*
Affiliation:
University of Leuven, School for Mass Communication Research, Leuven, Belgium
Kathleen Beullens
Affiliation:
University of Leuven, School for Mass Communication Research, Leuven, Belgium
Marc Sabbe
Affiliation:
University of Leuven, University Hospitals, Emergency Medicine, Leuven, Belgium
Jan Van den Bulck
Affiliation:
University of Leuven, School for Mass Communication Research, Leuven, Belgium
*
Correspondence: Sara Nelissen, MA School for Mass Communication Research University of Leuven Parkstraat 45, PO Box 3603 3000 Leuven, Belgium E-mail Sara.Nelissen@soc.kuleuven.be

Abstract

Introduction

When the world is faced with a new potential pandemic outbreak, the media report heavily about it. Media are an important disseminator of health threat information. This study examined potential media effects during the 2009 outbreak of A/H1N1 influenza.

Hypothesis

To examine the relationship between media reports of the swine flu and self-registrations in an emergency department (ED) of a tertiary hospital in Flanders, Belgium.

Methods

All articles concerning swine flu published in seven Flemish newspapers were selected during the biggest flu peak in Belgium. This number was compared with the number of patients who presented themselves with a self-diagnosis of swine flu symptoms during the same time frame. The Pearson's correlation coefficient was selected to determine the relationship. The cross-correlation function determined the direction of this relationship.

Results

A strong correlation was found between the number of potential patients (n = 308) and the number of articles in the Flemish press (n = 1657). The number of patients was the leading indicator; increases in the volume of written press followed increases in the number of patients.

Conclusion

Media reporting is extensive when a new infectious disease breaks out and intensifies when it is feared that pandemic levels are reached. This was also the case with the swine flu outbreak in Flanders. These findings suggest that a rise in the number of media reports follows a rise in the number of cases, rather than the reverse.

NelissenS, BeullensK, SabbeM, Van den BulckJ. The Swine Flu Emergency Department: The Relationship Between Media Attention for the Swine Flu and Registrations in an Emergency Medicine Unit. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2014;29(2):1-5.

Type
Original Research
Copyright
Copyright © World Association for Disaster and Emergency Medicine 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. World Health Organization. Assessing the severity of an influenza pandemic. http://www.who.int/csr/disease/swineflu/assess/disease_swineflu_assess_20090511/en/index.html. Accessed January 08, 2013.Google Scholar
2. Chan, M. World now at the start of 2009 influenza pandemic. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2009/h1n1_pandemic_phase6_20090611/en/index.html. Accessed January 08, 2013.Google Scholar
3. Johnson, NPAS, Muller, J. Updating the accounts: global mortality of the 1918-1920 “Spanish” influenza pandemic. Bull Hist Med. 2002;76(1):105-115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Van Damme, W, Van Lerberghe, W. Epidemics and fear. Trop Med Int Health. 2000;5(8):511-514.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6. Person, B, Sy, F, Holton, K, et al. Fear and stigma: the epidemic within the SARS outbreak. Emerg Infect Dis. 2004;10(2):358-363.Google Scholar
7. Fear of avian influenza is a double-edged sword. Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1751.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Greco, P. Pandemic: how to avoid panic? Sci Commun. 2005;4(4):1-2.Google Scholar
9. Hellsten, L, Nerlich, B. Bird flu hype: the spread of a disease outbreak through the media and Internet discussion groups. J Lang Polit. 2010;9(3):393-408.Google Scholar
10. Dudo, AD, Dahlstrom, MF, Brossard, D. Reporting a potential pandemic: a risk-related assessment of avian influenza coverage in US newspapers. Sci Commun. 2007;28(4):429-454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Cheng, C. To be paranoid is the standard? Panic responses to SARS outbreak in the Hong Kong special administrative region. Asian Perspect. 2004;28(1):67-98.Google Scholar
12. Vasterman, PLM, Ruigrok, N. Pandemic alarm in the Dutch media: media coverage of the 2009 influenza A (H1N1) pandemic and the role of the expert sources. Eur J Commun. 2013;28(4):436-453.Google Scholar
13. Hilton, S, Hunt, K. UK newspapers’ representations of the 2009-2010 outbreak of swine flu: one health scare not over-hyped by the media? J Epidemiol Community Health. 2011;65(10):941-946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14. Duncan, B. How the media reported the first days of the pandemic (H1N1) 2009: results of EU-wide media analysis. Euro Surveill. 2009;14(30):19286.Google Scholar
15. Holland, K, Blood, RW. Not just another flu? The framing of Swine Flu in the Australian Press. Presented at: Media, Democracy and Change. Refereed Proceedings of the Australian and New Zealand Communications Association Annual Conference; July 7-9, 2010; Canberra, Australia.Google Scholar
16. Jones, JH, Salathé, M. Early assessment of anxiety and behavioral response to novel swine-origin influenza A (H1N1). Plos One. 2009;4(12):e8032.Google Scholar
17. Van den Bulck, J, Custers, K. Television exposure is related to fear of avian flu, an ecological study across 23 member states of the European Union. Eur J Public Health. 2009;19(4):370-374.Google Scholar
18. McCombs, ME, Shaw, DL. The agenda-setting function of mass media. Publ Opin Q. 1972;36(2):176-187.Google Scholar
19. Rosenstock, I. Why people use health services. Milbank Q. 1966;44(3):94-127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20. McCombs, ME, Shaw, DL. The evolution of agenda-setting research: twenty-five years in the marketplace of ideas. J Commun. 1995;43(2):58-67.Google Scholar
21. Janz, NK, Becker, MH. The health belief model: a decade later. Health Edu Behav. 1984;11(1):1-47.Google ScholarPubMed
22. McDonnell, WM, Nelson, DS, Schunk, JE. Should we fear “flu fear” itself? Effects of H1N1 influenza fear on ED use. Am J Emerg Med. 2012;30(2):275-282.Google Scholar
23. Explore Flu Trends Belgium. Google Flu Trends Web site. http://www.google.org/flutrends/be/#BE. Accessed October 29, 2012.Google Scholar
24. Public results. Center for Information about the Media in Belgium. http://cim.be/media/pers/de-echtverklaring/resultaten/openbare-resultaten. Accessed January 08, 2013.Google Scholar
25. Belgian government portal. A statistical overview of the Belgian population. http://www.belgium.be/nl/over_belgie/land/bevolking/. Accessed January 07, 2013.Google Scholar
26. Box, GEP, Jenkins, GM. Time series analysis, forecasting and control. San Francisco, California USA: Holden Day; 1970 as cited in Niklasson B, Hörnfeldt B, Lundman B. Could myocarditis, insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus, and guillain-barré syndrome be caused by one or more infectious agents carried by rodents?. Emerg Infect Dis. 1998;4(2):187-193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Gupta, V. SPSS for Beginners, 1st ed. La Vergne, Tenn: Lightning Source Inc; 1993:391-396.Google Scholar
28. Chan, M. as cited in Gilman, SL. The art of medicine: moral panic and pandemics. Lancet. 2010;375(9729):1866-1867.Google Scholar
29. World Health Organization. Fact Sheets: Influenza (seasonal). http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs211/en/index.html. Accessed January 07, 2013.Google Scholar
30. Seynaeve, G. Editorial influenza pandemic: a perspective. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2010;24(6):473-477.Google Scholar
31. Ungar, S. Global bird flu communication—hot crisis and media reassurance. Sci Commun. 2008;29(4):472-497.Google Scholar
32. World Health Organization as cited in Editorial: fear of avian influenza is a double-edged sword. Lancet. 2005;366(9499):1751.Google Scholar
33. Wray, RJ, Becker, SM, Henderson, N, et al. Communicating with the public about emerging health threats: lessons from the pre-event message development project. Am J Public Health. 2008;98(12):2214-2222.Google Scholar