Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-11T21:28:41.210Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Weak-Type Boundedness of the Fourier Transform on Rearrangement Invariant Function Spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 June 2018

Santiago Boza
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, EETAC, Polytechnical University of Catalonia, E-08860 Castelldefels, Spain (santiago.boza@upc.edu)
Javier Soria
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics and Informatics, University of Barcelona, Gran Via 585, E-08007 Barcelona, Spain (soria@ub.edu)

Abstract

We study several questions about the weak-type boundedness of the Fourier transform ℱ on rearrangement invariant spaces. In particular, we characterize the action of ℱ as a bounded operator from the minimal Lorentz space Λ(X) into the Marcinkiewicz maximal space M(X), both associated with a rearrangement invariant space X. Finally, we also prove some results establishing that the weak-type boundedness of ℱ, in certain weighted Lorentz spaces, is equivalent to the corresponding strong-type estimates.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Edinburgh Mathematical Society 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Ariño, M. A. and Muckenhoupt, B., Maximal functions on classical Lorentz spaces and Hardy's inequality with weights for nonincreasing functions, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 320 (1990), 727735.Google Scholar
2.Benedetto, J. J. and Heinig, H. P., Weighted Fourier inequalities: new proofs and generalizations, J. Fourier Anal. Appl. 9 (2003), 137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Bennett, C. and Sharpley, R., Interpolation of operators (Academic Press, Boston, 1988).Google Scholar
4.Brandolini, L. and Colzani, L., Fourier transform, oscillatory multipliers and evolution equations in rearrangement invariant function spaces, Colloq. Math. 71(2) (1996), 273286.Google Scholar
5.Carro, M. J., Pick, L., Soria, J. and Stepanov, V., On embeddings between classical Lorentz spaces, Math. Inequal. Appl. 4 (2001), 397428.Google Scholar
6.Halperin, I., Function spaces, Canad. J. Math. 5 (1953), 273288.Google Scholar
7.Jodeit, M. Jr and Torchinsky, A., Inequalities for Fourier transforms, Studia Math. 37 (1971), 245276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Lorentz, G. G., Bernstein polynomials (University of Toronto Press, Toronto, 1953).Google Scholar
9.Sawyer, E., Boundedness of classical operators on classical Lorentz spaces, Studia Math. 96 (1990), 145158.Google Scholar
10.Sinnamon, G., Interpolation of spaces defined by the level function (ed. Igari, S.), ICM-90 Satellite Conference Proceedings, Harmonic Analysis, pp. 190193 (Springer-Verlag, Tokyo, 1991).Google Scholar
11.Sinnamon, G., Spaces defined by the level function and their duals, Studia Math. 111 (1994), 1952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.Sinnamon, G., The level function in rearrangement invariant spaces, Publ. Mat. 45 (2001), 175198.Google Scholar
13.Sinnamon, G., The Fourier transform in weighted Lorentz spaces, Publ. Mat. 47 (2003), 329.Google Scholar