Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x24gv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-30T10:58:43.879Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Combined strong and weak gravitational lensing mass measurements in clusters of galaxies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2024

Davide Abriola*
Affiliation:
University of Milan.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Gravitational lensing in clusters of galaxies is one of the most powerful methods to probe the dark matter mass distribution inside such systems, after mapping the baryonic component, and test the currently accepted ɅCDM cosmological paradigm. With the advent of new high-resolution facilities such as the JWST, strong lensing (SL) is capable of providing extremely accurate mass measurements in the densest regions of such structures. Weak lensing (WL) provides complementary information by measuring the total mass distribution in the outskirts of galaxy clusters, where no multiple images of background sources are produced.

In my talk, I will present updates on the WL mass reconstruction of the Frontier Fields galaxy cluster Abell 2744 (z = 0.308) based on Subaru, Magellan, and JWST data, and I will show how the results obtained, combined with accurate SL modeling of this lens, provide a consistent picture of the cluster total mass distribution. I will discuss the pipeline used for this work, the extensive checks performed on the different datasets and the scientific results obtained. Being composed of several substructures undergoing a merging process, the complex geometry of this cluster makes it an ideal laboratory to verify the consistency and reliability of the results obtained with the two methods. I will compare the predictions of the SL models extrapolated in the outer regions of the cluster with the non-parametric WL mass reconstruction to look for potential systematic effects affecting the SL analysis.

Type
Contributed Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Bartelmann, M. & Schneider, P., 2001, Physics Reports, 340, 291 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergamini, P., Acebron, A., Grillo, C. et al., 2023, A&A, 670, A60 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergamini, P., Acebron, A., Grillo, C. et al., 2023, arXiv:2303.10210Google Scholar
Bertin, E. & Arnouts, S., 1996, A& ASuppl. Ser., 117, 393 Google Scholar
Liaudat, T., Bonnin, J., Starck, J. L., et al., 2021, A&A, 646, A27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lombardi, M. & Bertin, G., 1998, A&A, 330, 791 Google Scholar
Lombardi, M. & Bertin, G., 1999, A&A, 348, 38 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medezinski, E., Broadhurst, T., Umetsu, K., et al., 2010, MNRAS, 405, 257 Google Scholar
Medezinski, E., Umetsu, K., Okabe, N., et al., 2016, ApJ, 817, 24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medezinski, E., Oguri, M., Nishizawa, A. J., et al., 2018, PASJ, 70, 30 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, E. & Huff, E. M., 2017, ApJ, 841, 24 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheldon, E., 2015, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1508.008Google Scholar
Umetsu, K., 2020, A&A Rev., 28, 7 Google Scholar
Yang, G., Xue, Y. Q., Luo, B., et al., 2014, ApJS, 215, 27 CrossRefGoogle Scholar