Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-p2v8j Total loading time: 0.001 Render date: 2024-06-02T19:28:31.315Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The “External” Shears In Strong Lens Models

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 March 2024

James W. Nightingale*
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Centre for Extragalactic Astronomy, Durham University, South Rd, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
Amy Etherington
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Centre for Extragalactic Astronomy, Durham University, South Rd, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
Richard Massey
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Centre for Extragalactic Astronomy, Durham University, South Rd, Durham, DH1 3LE, UK.
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The distribution of mass in galaxy-scale strong gravitational lenses is often modelled as an elliptical power law plus ‘external shear’, which notionally accounts for line-of-sight galaxies and cosmic shear. We argue that it does not, using three lines of evidence from the analysis of 54 galaxy-scale strong lenses: (i) strong lensing external shears do not correlate with weak lensing; (ii) the measured shear magnitudes in strong lenses (which are field galaxies) are too large (exceeding 0.05) for their environment and; (iii) the external shear position angle preferentially aligns or anti-aligns with the mass model position angle, indicating an internal origin. We argue the measured strong lensing shears are therefore systematically accounting for missing complexity in the canonical elliptical power-law mass model. If we can introduce this complexity into our lens models, this will further lensing studies of galaxy formation, dark matter and Cosmology.

Type
Contributed Paper
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of International Astronomical Union

References

Bolton, A. S., et al., 2008, ApJ, 682, 964CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birrer, S., et al., 2017, Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, 2017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, X. et al., 2021, RAA, 22, 30 ppGoogle Scholar
Etherington A. et al., 2023b, arXiv:2301.05244Google Scholar
Etherington A. et al., 2022, MNRAS, 517, 3275 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomer, M. R., Williams, L. L. R., 2021, MNRAS, 504, 1340 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hogg, N. et al., 2023, MNRAS, 520, 5982 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keeton, C. R., Kochanek, C. S., Seljak, U., 1997, ApJ, 482, 604 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochanek, C. S., 2021, MNRAS, 501, 5021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nightingale, J. W., Dye, S., 2015, MNRAS, 452, 2940 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nightingale, J., Dye, S., Massey, R., 2018, MNRAS, 47, 1 Google Scholar
Nightingale, J. W., et al., 2019, MNRASGoogle Scholar
Nightingale, J. et al., 2021, J. Open Source Softw., 6, 282 Google Scholar
Schneider, P., 2014, arXiv:1409.0015Google Scholar
Shu, Y. et al., 2016, ApJ, 824, 86 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suyu et al., 2016, MNRAS, 468, 2590 Google Scholar
Van De Vyvere, L., et al., 2022a, A&A, 659, 1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van De Vyvere, L., et al., 2022b, A&A, 179, 1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vegetti, S., et al., 2014, MNRAS, 442, 2017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Witt, H. J., Mao, S., 1997, MNRAS, 291, 211 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wong, K. C., et al., 2011, ApJ, 726CrossRefGoogle Scholar