Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T04:38:22.035Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Fractured Flints of the Eocene “Bull-head” Bed at Coe's Pit, Bramford near Ipswich

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 October 2013

Get access

Extract

During the past few years discoveries of flaked flints of various kinds have been made in certain pre-river-valley deposits in Suffolk and Norfolk, and the discoverers of these specimens have had to meet, from some quarters, a very determined opposition to the view that these stones have been fashioned by man at periods long anterior to those in which the earliest Palæolithic implements were made. The details of the discovery of these flaked flints have already been made public in various scientific publications, and papers have been published giving the discoverers' reasons for believing them to be of human manufacture, and their opponents' reasons for looking upon them as purely natural productions.

In the last part of our Proceedings I gave an account of the series of experiments I had carried through with flints subjected to natural pressure and percussion, and endeavoured to show how the flaking produced by these experiments differed from that seen upon undoubted examples of human handiwork. The chief objection brought against my conclusions was that it is impossible to imitate the forces of Nature which act upon flints by shaking stones in a sack and fracturing them by pressure in a screw-press, and I confess that at first sight this appears to be a very weighty argument and one difficult to refute. But a close and searching examination of these “mighty forces of Nature,” a phrase often used with marked effect upon an uncritical audience, will, I think, show that they are largely inoperative upon flints, and that if they are too “mighty” the flint succumbs and is shattered to fragments.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1914

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lankester, Sir Ray. “On the discovery of a novel type of flint implement below the base of the Red Crag.” Phil. Trans., Series B., vol. 202, pp. 283336 CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

Moir, J. Reid. Antea, pp. 17–43, 171–184, 307–319, 368374 Google Scholar.

Clarke, W. G. Antea, pp. 160–8Google Scholar.

Moir, J. Reid. “Pre-Palæolithic Man.” Bedrock, Vol. 2, pp. 165176, July, 1913 Google Scholar.

Moir, J. Reid. “A description of the Pre-Palæolithic implements.” Bedrock, Vol. 2, pp. 490495 Google Scholar.

Haward, F. N.. Antea, pp. 185–193, 347359 Google Scholar.

Moir, J. Reid. “The making of a rostro-carinate flint implement.” Nature, Nov. 21st, 1912, p. 334 Google Scholar.

2 Antea, pp. 171–184.

3 Breuil H. “Sur la présence d'Éolithes à la base de l'Éocène Parisien.”–L'Anthropologie.

4 My best thanks are due to Mr. Coe, the owner of the pit, and to his foreman, Mr. Jackson, for their kindness and courtesy during my investigations.

5 There are a very few specimens which show a glazed surface, and are in a manner “patinated.” These may or may not be older than the “bull-head” bed, but by their appearance I feel confident they too have been fractured by pressure.