Online ordering is currently unavailable due to technical issues. We apologise for any delays responding to customers while we resolve this. For further updates please visit our website: https://www.cambridge.org/news-and-insights/technical-incident
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 25 October 2013
During the year 1924 I made some observations on the North Kent coast between Swalecliffe and Reculver for the purpose of locating the cultural horizon of the Thames pick, an implement which has been found in plenty upon the beach and sea floor in that locality, but which has not yet been indisputably classified by archæologists.
The finds made up to November, 1924, were shown by me to the Prehistoric Society of East Anglia, but the paper must be considered unsatisfactory since the pivot on which any conclusions from those finds had to turn was the date of the prehistoric pottery. On this question I found there were differences of opinion. On the one hand I was advised that the pottery was of the Early Iron Age, on the other that it was Neolithic. Having made a careful study of all the comparative evidence I could trace, I found myself unable to disregard either opinion. The apparent association of flint implements with the pottery, led me to adopt a Neolithic date, as at the time I had no evidence that Iron Age Man fashioned flint implements.
page 73 note * Proc. Prehist. Soc. East Anglia. Vol. IV., Part 2, p. 203/210Google Scholar.
page 73 note † It has since transpired that the stratum of oehreous fluvio-marine gravel which occurs beneath the marsh clay and caps the fine rainwash deposit of the low level sections at Hampton (Proc. P.S.E.A., Vol. IV., p. 208) was laid down in the formation of Dr. F. Buckland's experimental oyster tanks some sixty years ago. The remains of similar tanks may be seen to the east of Reculver.
page 73 note ‡ Water Supply of Kent. Whitaker, 1908, p. 211Google Scholar.
page 73 note § Water Supply of Kent. Whitaker, 1908, p. 211Google Scholar.
page 74 note* Proc. P.S.E.A. Vol. 3, p. 16Google Scholar.
page 74 note † Proc. Geol. Assoc. Vol. XI., p. 216Google Scholar.
page 74 note ‡ Coll. Antiq. Smith, C. Roach, Vol. VI., p. 173Google Scholar. And Spurrell, F. C. J., 1885, Arch. Jour., Vol. XLII. p. 269Google Scholar.
page 74 note § Proc. Soc. Antiq., XXII., p. 179Google Scholar.
page 74 note ∥ Proc. Sec. Antiq., XXX., p. 1Google Scholar.
page 76 note * Proc. Soc. Antiq., XXX., p. 31Google Scholar.
page 76 note † Affaldsdynger fra Stenalderen, i Danmark, 1900.
page 76 note ‡ Man, 1922, No. 75. Man, 1923, No. 83.
page 76 note § Proc. P.S.E.A., Vol. III., Part 4, p. 499Google Scholar.
page 76 note ** Oldtidens Kunst: Stenalderen, 1918. Sophus MüllerGoogle Scholar.
