Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T06:39:19.771Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anglo-French Co-operation in Archaeology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2014

J.G.D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Current Prehistory
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , December 1938 , pp. 340 - 350
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1938

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BRITISH

Palaeolithic

Barnes, A. S. ‘Les Outils de l'homme tertiaire en Angleterre. Etude critique,’ L'Anthropologie, 48 (1938), 217–36.Google Scholar
Jessen, Knud (and Farrington, A.). ‘The Bogs at Ballybetagh, near Dublin, with remarks on Late Glacial conditions in Ireland,’ .R.I.A., XLIV, B, 205–60.Google Scholar
Lacaille, A. D. ‘A Levallois Side-scraper from the Brickearth at Yiewsley, Middlesex,’ Ant. J., xviii, 55–7.Google Scholar
Marston, A. T. ‘The Swanscombe Skull,’ J.R.A.I., LXVII, 339–406.Google Scholar
McCallien, W. J. ‘Late Glacial and Early Post-glacial Scotland,’ Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., LXXI, 174–206.Google Scholar
Moir, J. Reid. ‘Four flint implements,’ Ant. J., XVII, 258–61.Google Scholar
The Swanscombe Committee of the Royal Anthropological Institute. ‘Report on the Swanscombe Skull,’ J.R.A.I., LXVIII, 17–99.Google Scholar
Lacaille, A. D. ‘Scottish gravers of flint and other stones,’ Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., LXXII, 180–92.Google Scholar
Movius, Hallam J. ‘A Stone Age Site at Glenarm, Co. Antrim,’ J. Roy. Soc. Ant. Ireland, LXVII, 181–220.Google Scholar
Whelan, C. Blake. ‘Studies in the Significance of the Irish Stone Age: the Culture Sequence,’ P.R.I.A., XLIV, C, 115–36.Google Scholar
Bruce-Mitford, R. L. S. ‘A Hoard of Neolithic Axes from Peaslake, Surrey,’ Ant. J., XVIII, 279–84.Google Scholar
Calder, C. S. T. ‘A Neolithic Double-Chambered Cairn of the Stalled Type … in the Calf of Eday, Orkney,’ Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., LXXI, 115–54.Google Scholar
Cook, Norman. Arch. Cant., XLIX, 284.Google Scholar
Daniel, Glyn E. ‘Excavations at Trehill, Glamorgan, June, 1936,’ Arch. Cambr., XCII, 287–93.Google Scholar
Evans, E. E. ‘Doey's Cairn, Dunloy, County Antrim,’ Ulster J. Arch., 1, 59–78.Google Scholar
Evans, E. E. ‘Giants' Graves,’ Ulster J. Arch., 3rd ser., 1, 7–19.Google Scholar
Evans, E. E. ‘A Chambered Cairn in Ballyedmond Park, County Down,’ Ulster J. Arch., 1, 49–58.Google Scholar
Hemp, W. J. ‘St. Kevin's Bed, Glendalough,’ J. Roy. Soc. Ant. Ireland, LXVII, 290–4.Google Scholar
Herring, Ivor J. ‘The Cairn Excavation at Well Glass Spring, Largantea, Co. Londonderry,’ Ulster J. Arch., 3rd ser. I, 164–188.Google Scholar
Lowry-Corry, , Dorothy, Lady (and Phyllis Richardson). ‘Megalithic Monuments in the Parishes of Killinagh, Co. Cavan, and Killesher, Co. Fermanagh,’ J. Roy. Soc. Ant. Ireland, LXVII (Dec. 1937). 155–175.Google Scholar
Piggott, Stuart. ‘Neolithic [‘A’] pottery from Hackpen, Avebury,’ Wilts. Arch. Mag., XLVIII, 90–91.Google Scholar
Sainty, J. E. (and Watson, A. Q. and Clarke, R. R.). ‘The First Norfolk Long Barrow,’ Norfolk and Norwich Arch. Soc., XXVI, 315–29.Google Scholar
Askew, Gilbert. ‘Report on the Excavation of two Bronze Age Burials at Benthall, Northumber-land,’ Arch. Aeliana, 4th ser. XV, 149–55.Google Scholar
Brailsford, J. W. ‘Bronze Age Stone Monuments of Dartmoor,’ Antiquity, 1938, 444–63.Google Scholar
Bulmer, William. ‘Note on a cist at Summerhill, Blaydon,’ Arch. Aeliana, 4th ser., XV, 218–21.Google Scholar
Prof.Childe, V. G. ‘A New Skara Brae,’ Ant. J., XVIII, 402–3.Google Scholar
MissClark, M. Kitson. ‘The Yorkshire Food-vessel,’ Arch. J., XCIV, 43–63.Google Scholar
Davies, Oliver. ‘Castledamph Stone Circle,’ J.R.S. Ant. Ireland, LXVIII, 106–12Google Scholar
MrsDobson, D. P. ‘A Beaker from Somerset’, Ant. J., XVIII, 172.Google Scholar
Dunning, G. C. ‘Bronze Age Beakers found in Bedfordshire,’ Ant. J., XVIII, 284–6.Google Scholar
DrFawcett, E. ‘Report on a Bronze Age burial at Sutton Bank, near Thirsk, Yorkshire,’ Yorks. Arch. J., XXXIII, 418–25.Google Scholar
Prof.Forde, C. Daryll. ‘Dysgwylfa Fawr Barrow, Cardiganshire—A Food Vessel and Dug-out Trunk Cremation Burial,’ Bull. Board Celtic Studies, IX, pt. II, 188–9.Google Scholar
Grant, Walter G. ‘Excavation of Bronze Age Burial Mounds at Quandale, Rousay, Orkney,’ Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., LXXI, 72–84.Google Scholar
Grimes, W. F. ‘The Excavation of Gorsey Bigbury. Section in. The Pottery,’ Proc. Univ. Bristol Spelaeo. Soc., vol. 5, 25–45.Google Scholar
Grinsell, L. V. ‘Hampshire Barrows,’ Proc. Hants. F. C. and Arch. Soc., XIV, pt. 1, 9–40.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C. F. C. ‘Sicilian Bronze Axe from near Hengistbury Head,’ Antiquity, 1938, 225–8.Google Scholar
Herring, Ivor. ‘The Beaker Folk,’ Ulster Arch. J., 3rd ser. 1, 135–39.Google Scholar
Rev.Hewson, L. M. ‘Notes on Irish Sandhills,’ J.R.S. Ant. Ireland, LXVIII, 69–80.Google Scholar
Jones, S. J. ‘The Excavation of Gorsey Bigbury. Sections 1, 11, VI and VII,’ Proc. Univ. Bristol Spelaeo. Soc., vol. 5, 3–24.Google Scholar
Mears, J. B. ‘Urn Burials of the Bronze Age at Brackmont Mill, Leuchars, Fife,’ Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., LXXI, 252–78.Google Scholar
Stevens, Frank (and Stone, J. F. S.) ‘The Barrows of Winterslow,’ Wilts. Arch. Mag., XLVIII, 174–82.Google Scholar
Varley, W. J. ‘The Bleasdale Circle,’ Ant. J., XVIII, 154–71.Google Scholar
Prof.Childe, V. G. (and Thorneycroft, W.) ‘The Vitrified Fort at Rahoy, Morven, Argyll,’ Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., LXXII, 23–43.Google Scholar
Prof.Childe, V. G. (and Thorneycroft, W.). ‘The Experimental Production of the Phenomena Distinctive of Vitrified Forts,’ Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., LXXII, 44–5.Google Scholar
Clarke, Rainbird. ‘An Iron Age Hut at Postwick, and an Earthwork on East Wretham Heath, Norfolk,’ Norfolk and Norwich Arch. Soc. XXVI, 271–80.Google Scholar
MrsClifford, E. M. ‘The Earthworks at Rodborough, Amberley and Minchinhampton, Gloucester-shire,’ Trans. Bristol and Glos. Arch. Soc., vol. 59, 287–307.Google Scholar
Corder, P. (and Pryce, T. Davies). ‘Belgic and other early pottery found at North Ferriby, Yorks. With comments on pre-Claudian Romano-Gaulish influence in Britain,’ Ant. J., XVIII, 262–77.Google Scholar
DrCurwen, E. C. ‘The Hebrides: a Cultural Backwater,’ Antiquity, 1938, 261–89.Google Scholar
DrGarrood, J. R. ‘Iron Age Pottery at Salome Lodge, Hunts,’ Ant. J., XVII, 286–7.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C. F. C. ‘A Hallstatt bronze sword from the Thames at Taplow,’ Ant. J., XVIII, 185–7.Google Scholar
Rev.Horne, Very Prior. ‘An Early Iron Age Site at Camerton, Somerset,’ Som. Arch, and N.H.S. Proc., LXXXIII, 155–65.Google Scholar
DrJacobsthal, Paul. ‘An Iberian Bronze found at Sligo,’ J.R.S. Ant. Ireland, LXVIII, 51–4.Google Scholar
DrJacobsthal, Paul. ‘Celtic Rock-carvings in Northern Italy and Yorkshire,’ J. Roman Studies, XXVIII, 65–9.Google Scholar
Jessup, R. F. ‘Objects from Bigberry Camp, Harbledown, Kent,’ Ant. J., XVIII, 174–8.Google Scholar
Kilbride-Jones, H. E. ‘The Excavation of a native settlement at Milking Gap, High Shield, Northumberland,’ Arch. Aeliana, 4th ser., XV, 303–350.Google Scholar
Kilbride-Jones, H. E. ‘Notes on an Early Iron Age Bloomery at Loanhead of Daviot, Aberdeenshire,’ Proc. Soc. Ant. Scot., LXXI, 401–5.Google Scholar
Raftery, J. ‘Zur Zeitbestimmung der irischen Eisenzeit,’ Marburger Studien, 202–4.Google Scholar
Seaby, W. A. ‘Early British Coins found in Berkshire and in the Silchester District,’ Berks. Arch. J., vol. 42, 75–91.Google Scholar
Willmot, G. F. ‘Three Burial Sites at Carbury, Co. Kildare,’ J.R.S. Ant. Ireland, LXVIII, 130–42.Google Scholar
Bibby, H. C.The Evolution of Man and his Culture. London, 1938.Google Scholar
DrClark, J. G. D. ‘Early Man,’ Victoria County History of Cambridgeshire, vol. 1, 247–304.Google Scholar
SirFox, Cyril. The Personality of Britain. 3rd edition, pp. 98. Cardiff, 1938.Google Scholar
Godwin, H. (and Clifford, M. H.), ‘Studies of the Post-glacial History of British Vegetation,’ Phila. Trans. Roy. Soc., ser. B, vol. 229, 323–406.Google Scholar
Hawkes, C. F. C. ‘Current British Archaeology: a Survey of Aims and Needs,’ First Ann. Rep. Univ. of London Inst. of Archaeology.Google Scholar
Howells, W. W. ‘The Prehistoric Craniology of Britain,’ Antiquity, 1938, 332–9.Google Scholar
Laidler, Barbara (and Young, W. E. V.). ‘A surface flint industry from a site near Stonehenge,’ Wilts. Arch. Mag., XLVIII, 150–60.Google Scholar
Maryon, Herbert. ‘The Technical Methods of the Irish Smiths in the Bronze and Early Iron Ages,’ P.R.I.A., XLIV, sect. C, 181–228.Google Scholar
Maryon, Herbert. ‘Some Prehistoric Metalworkers' Tools,’ Ant. J., XVIII, 243–50.Google Scholar
Megaw, Basil. ‘Bibliography of Periodical Literature relating to the Archaeology of Ulster (1937),’ Ulster J. Arch., 3rd ser., 1, 231–4.Google Scholar
DrNorth, F. J. ‘Geology for Archaeologists,’ Arch. J., XCIV, 73–115.Google Scholar
Orwin, C. S. and C. S., The Open Fields, pp. 332. Oxford Press, 1938.Google Scholar
Shotton, F. W. ‘The Distribution of Neolithic, Bronze Age and Iron Age Relics around Coventry,’ Proc. Coventry N.H. and Scientific Soc., vol. 1, 184–92.Google Scholar
Underhill, F. M. ‘Notes on Recent Antiquarian Discoveries in Berkshire (II),’ Berks. Arch. J., 20–28.Google Scholar

Foreign

Palaeolithic

Blanc, A. C. ‘Sulla penetrazione e diffusione in Europa ed in Italia de Paleolitico superiore in funzione della paleoclimatologia e paleogeografia glaciali,’ Quartär, 1 (1938), 1–26.Google Scholar
Breuil, l'abbé H. ‘The Use of Bone Implements in the Old Palaeolithic Period,’ Antiquity, 1938, 56–67.Google Scholar
Brodar, S. ‘Das Palaolithikum in Jugoslawien,’ Quartär, 1 (1938), 140–72.Google Scholar
Gams, H. ‘Die bisherigen Ergebnisse der Mikrostratigraphie für die Gliederung der letzten Eiszeit und des Jungpaläolithikums in Mittel- und Nordeuropa,’ Quartär, 1 (1938), 75–96.Google Scholar
Golomshtok, E. A. ‘The Old Stone Age in European Russia,’ Trans. Am. Philosophical Soc., new ser. XXIX, 197–468.Google Scholar
Grahmann, R. ‘Abschläge von Clactonienart in Mitteldeutschland,’ Quartär, 1 (1938), 173–7.Google Scholar
Jura, A. ‘Das Aurignacien in Polen,’ Quartär, 1 (1938), 54–75.Google Scholar
Mottl, M. ‘Faunen, Flora und Kultur des ungarischen Solutréen,’ Quartär, 1 (1938), 36–54.Google Scholar
Riek, G. ‘Ein Beitrag zur kenntnis des süddeutschen Solutréen,’ Germania, 22 (1938), 147–50.Google Scholar
Schwabedissen, Herman. ‘Die Hamburger Stufe in nordwestlichen Deutschland,’ Ojfa, 2 (1937), 1–30.Google Scholar
Bagge, Axel. ‘Västkustens Stenåldersboplatser och Nivåförändringar,’ Fornavännen, 1937, 357–76.Google Scholar
Brøgger, A. W. ‘Elghornøksen fra Hurum-ruggen,’ Viking, 1938, 121–36.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D. ‘The Reindeer Hunting Tribes of Northern Europe,’ Antiquity, 1938, 154–71.Google Scholar
DrGross, Hugo. ‘Die bearbeiteten Rengeweihe Ostpreussens,’ Nachr. für Deutsche Vorzeit, 1938, 117–24.Google Scholar
DrGross, Hugo. ‘Auf den ältesten Spuren des Menschen in Altpreussen,’ Prussia, bd. 32 (1938), 84–139.Google Scholar
Gumpert, K. ‘Die Tardenoisienstation Hohlstein im Klumpertal, BA. Pegnitz (Frankische Schweiz),’ Germania, 22 (1938), 1–3.Google Scholar
Kunkel, O. ‘Bericht aus Pommern,’ Nach. für Deutsche Vorzeit, 1938, 185–6 and Taf. 41, 1.Google Scholar
Rust, Alfred. ‘Mittlesteinzeitliche Hausgrundrisse und Graber aus der Grabung Pinnberg (Ahrensberg, Holstein),’ Nachr. für Deutsche Vorzeit, 1938, 13–5.Google Scholar
Sauramo, M. ‘Ein harpunierter Seehund aus dem Litorina-ton Nordfinnlands,’ Quartär, 1 (1938), 26–35.Google Scholar
Troels-Smith, J. ‘Beile aus dem Mesolithicum Dänemarks. Ein einteilungsversuch,’ Acta Arch., VIII, 278–92.Google Scholar
Vignard, E. (with Giraud, E. and Vache, C). ‘Le Gisement Mésolithique de Piscop,’ L'Anthropologie, 48, 1–27.Google Scholar
Westerby, Erik. ‘A Zealand Maglemose site with Potsherds,’ Acta Arch., VIII, 295–301.Google Scholar
ProfBreuil, l'abbé H. (with Le Rouzic, Z. and Boyle, Mary E.). ‘La Figure Humaine dans la Décoration des allées couvertes du Morbihan,’ Préhistoire, IV, 7–48.Google Scholar
Buttler, W.Der Donauländische und der Westische Kulturkreise der Jüngeren Steinzeit. pp. 108. Leipzig. 1938.Google Scholar
Buttler, W. ‘Beiträge zur Frage des jungsteinzeitlichen Handels,’ Marburger Studien, 26–33.Google Scholar
Kersten, W. ‘Spuren der nordeurasischen Wohnplatzkultur am Niederrhein,’ Germania, 22 (1938), 71–7.Google Scholar
Leisner, G. ‘Ausgemeisselte Türen in Megalithgräbern der Pyrenäenhalbinsel,’ Marburger Studien, 147–55.Google Scholar
Prof.Sprockhoff, E.Die Nordische Megalithkultur. pp. 164. Leipzig. 1938.Google Scholar
Zotz, L. F. ‘Zum gegenwartigen Stand der Altsteinzeitforschung in Deutschland,’ Quartär, 1 (1938), 179–86.Google Scholar
Bittel, K. ‘Bronze Age Einige Bemerkungen zu trojanischen Funden,’ Marburger Studien (1938), 9–19.Google Scholar
Bursch, F. C. ‘Zur Frage der Deverel–Urnen in der Niederlanden,’ Marburger Studien 20–5.Google Scholar
Field, H. (with Prostove, E.). ‘Tin deposits in the Caucasus’, Antiquity, 1938, 341–5.Google Scholar
Lechler, G. ‘The Beginning of the Bronze Age and the Halberd,’ Am. School of Prehistoric Research, Bull. 14, 9–54.Google Scholar
Nestor, J. ‘Die verzierten Streitäxte mit Nackenscheibe aus Westrumanien,’ Marburger Studien (1938), 178–92.Google Scholar
Sprockhoff, E. ‘Die spindlersfelder Fibel,’ Marburger Studien 205–33.Google Scholar
Uenze, O. ‘Zur datierung der friihen Bronzezeit Mitteleuropas,’ Marburger Studien 243–8.Google Scholar
Böhm, J.Základy Hallstattské periody v Cechách. pp. 299. Prague. 1937. (German summary).Google Scholar
Prof.Moora, H.Die Eisenzeit in Lettland bis etwa 500 n. Chr. 11 Teil. pp. 749. Tartu. 1938.Google Scholar
DrBlanc, A. C. ‘Le Glaciaire, considéré aux points de vue paléobiologique et géomorphologiqué,’ L'Anthropologie, 48, pp. 261–76.Google Scholar
Brønsted, J.Danmarks Oldtid. I. Stenalderen. København, 1938.Google Scholar
Prof.Childe, V. G. ‘The Orient and Europe,’ Sectional Addresses, British Association, 1938, 181–96.Google Scholar
Crowfoot, G. M. ‘Mat impressions on pot bases,’ Liv. Ann. Arch, and Anthr., XXV, 3–11.Google Scholar
Field, Henry (with Prostov, E.) ‘Archaeology in the U.S.S.R., Ann. Anthrop., 40, pp. 653–79.Google Scholar
Gordon, Lt.-Col. D. H. ‘The Microlithic Industries of India,’ Man, 1938, 19.Google Scholar
Mecquenem, R. de. ‘Fouilles Préhistoriques en Asia occidentale (1934–7),’ L'Anthropologie, 48, PP. 55–71.Google Scholar
DrOtto, Helmut. ‘Stand der quantitativen Untersuchung vorgeschichtlicher Metallfunde,’ Nachr. für Deutsche Vorzeit, 1938, 71–4.Google Scholar
Pradenne, A. Vayson de. La Préhistoire. pp. 220. Paris.Google Scholar
Serner, A.On ‘Dyss’ (barrow or cairn) burial and beliefs about the dead during the Stone Age with special regard to South Scandinavia, pp. 252. Lund. 1938.Google Scholar
Stokar, W. von. ‘Prehistoric Organic Remains,’ Antiquity, 1938, 82–6.Google Scholar
DrVogt, E.Geflechte und Gewebe der Steinzeit. pp. 122. Basel, 1937.Google Scholar
Völzing, O. ‘Die Grabung 1937 am Hohlestein im Lonetal,’ Fundber. aus Schwaben, N.F. ix, 1–7.Google Scholar
Wu, G. D.Prehistoric Pottery in China. Courtauld Institute of Art, London. 1938.Google Scholar