Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T15:58:30.438Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Excavation of Tell Abu Hureyra in Syria: A preliminary report

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

A. M. T. Moore ,
G. C. Hillman  and
A. J. Legge
A. M. T. Moore
Affiliation:
University College, Oxford; British Institute of Archaeology, Ankara; University of London, Department of Extra-Mural Studies, 7 Ridgmount Street, London WC1E 7AD
G. C. Hillman
Affiliation:
University College, Oxford; British Institute of Archaeology, Ankara; University of London, Department of Extra-Mural Studies, 7 Ridgmount Street, London WC1E 7AD
A. J. Legge
Affiliation:
University College, Oxford; British Institute of Archaeology, Ankara; University of London, Department of Extra-Mural Studies, 7 Ridgmount Street, London WC1E 7AD
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the last decade the Government of the Syrian Arab Republic has undertaken a number of projects to develop the economy of the country. The most important of these has been the construction of a dam on the Euphrates at Tabqa (fig. 1), 40 km upstream from Raqqa. This project will bring great economic benefits to Syria but, as the valley behind the dam fills with water, many ancient sites will be drowned. Because very little was known about the archaeology of this stretch of the Euphrates the Directorate-General of Antiquities and Museums in Syria organised an international programme of surveys and excavations to recover as much information as possible about past human settlement in the valley before the dam was completed. This programme has yielded excellent results; important sites in almost every period from the prehistoric to the Islamic have been discovered and excavated. The work has been carried out by the Syrian authorities themselves and fifteen other teams. We were asked to excavate a prehistoric site as our contribution to the programme and so in 1971 we made a brief survey of the valley to look for a site.

Pioneer surveys and excavations by de Contenson and others had established an outline of the later prehistory of Syria. Neolithic settlements (fig. 2) had been excavated at Ras Shamra (Schaeffer 1962, 153 ff.) and Tabbat el-Hammam (Braidwood 1940, 196 ff.) on the coast, Tell Ramad (de Contenson 1971, 279 ff.) and other smaller sites near Damascus, and Buqras (de Contenson and van Liere 1966, 182 ff.) in the Euphrates valley. From these excavations the later Neolithic of the sixth millennium bc and after was relatively well-known. This was the period when ‘dark-faced burnished ware’, the earliest pottery found in Syria, was first made. The archaeological sequence could be taken further back as seventh millennium aceramic Neolithic levels had been found at Ras Shamra, Ramad and Buqras. Then there was a gap in the sequence, representing the earlier seventh and the later eighth millennia bc. Only one earlier site was known; this was Mureybat which had been discovered when the first surveys of the Tabqa dam area were made (Rihaoui 1965, 106; van Loon 1967, 15). The first campaign of excavations here, directed by van Loon, had revealed tantalising remains of a settlement dating from 8000 bc (van Loon 1968, Table 1), the very beginning of the Neolithic in Syria.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 41 , December 1975 , pp. 50 - 77
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Boessnek, J., 1969. ‘Osteological differences between Sheep (Ovis aries Linné) and Goat (Capra hircus Linné)’. In Higgs, E. S. and Brothwell, D. (ed.), Science in Archaeology, 331–58. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Bostanci, E. Y., 1959. ‘Researches on the Mediterranean coast of Anatolia, a new Palaeolithic site at Beldibi near Antalya. Preliminary report’, Anatolia, 4, 129–78.Google Scholar
Bostanci, E. Y., 1962. ‘A new upper Palaeolithic and Mesolithic facies at Belbasi rock shelter on the Mediterranean coast of Anatolia’, Belleten, 26, nos. 101–104, 252–92.Google Scholar
Braidwood, R. J., 1940. ‘Report of two sondages on the coast of Syria, south of Tartous’, Syria, 21, 183–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Braidwood, R. J. and Braidwood, L. S., 1960. Excavations in the Plain of Antioch, I. The earlier assemblages A-J. University Press, Chicago.Google Scholar
Cauvin, J., 1968. Les Outillages Néolithiques de Byblos et du Littoral Libanais. Fouilles de Byblos IV. Librairie d'Amérique et d'Orient, Adrien Maissonneuve, Paris.Google Scholar
Cauvin, J., 1972. ‘Nouvelles fouilles à Tell Mureybet (Syrie) 1971–1972, rapport préliminaire’, Annales Archéologiques Arabes Syriennes, 22, 105–15.Google Scholar
de Contenson, H., 1971. ‘Tell Ramad, a village of Syria of the 7th and 6th millennia B.C.’, Archaeology, 24.Google Scholar
de Contenson, H., 1973. ‘Chronologie absolue de Tell Aswad (Damascène, Syrie)’, BSPF, 70, no. 8, 253–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Contenson, H. and van Liere, W. J., 1966. ‘Premier sondage à Bouqras en 1965. Rapport préliminaire’, Annales Archéologiques Arabes Syriennes, 16, no. 2, 181–92.Google Scholar
Ducos, P., 1968. L'origine des Animaux Domestiques en Palestine. Publications de l'Institut de Préhistoire de l'Université de Bordeaux, mémoire 6. Delmas, Bordeaux.Google Scholar
French, D. H., 1971. ‘An experiment in water-sieving’, Anatolian Studies, 21, 59–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilot, E. and Cauvin, J., 1973. ‘Datation par le carbon 14 du village natoufien et précéramique de Mureybet, sur l'Euphrate (Syrie)’, BSPF, 70, no. 2, 37–8.Google Scholar
Harlan, J. R. and Zohary, D., 1966. ‘Distribution of wild wheats and barley’, Science, 153, 1075–80.Google Scholar
Helbaek, H., 1970. ‘The origin and migration of rye, Secale cereale L; a palaeoethnographic study’. In Davis, P. H. et al. (eds.), Plant Life in southwestern Asia. 265–80.Google Scholar
Helbaek, H., 1974. ‘The Fyrkal grain: a geographical and chronological study’. In Olsen, O. et al. , Fyrkal. En jysk vikingeborg.Google Scholar
Higgs, E. S. and Vita-Finzi, C., 1972. ‘Prehistoric economies: a territorial approach’. In Higgs, E. S. (ed.), Papers in Economic Prehistory, 27–36. University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hillman, G. C., 1972. ‘Excavations at Can Hasan III. The Plant remains’. In Higgs, E. S. (ed.), Papers in Economic Prehistory, 182–88. University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hopf, M., 1969. ‘Plant remains and early farming at Jericho’. In Ucko, P. J. and Dimbleby, G. W. (ed.), The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals, 355–59. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Jarman, H. N., Legge, A. J. and Charles, J. A., 1972. ‘Retrieval of plant remains from archaeological sites by froth flotation’. In Higgs, E. S. (ed.), Papers in Economic Prehistory, 39–48. University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Legge, A. J., 1972. ‘Prehistoric exploitation of the gazelle in Palestine’. In Higgs, E. S. (ed.), Papers in Economic Prehistory, 119–24. University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Legge, A. J., 1973. Noy, T., and Higgs, E. S., ‘Recent excavations at Nahal Oren, Israel’, PPS, 39, 75–99.Google Scholar
Leroi-Gourhan, A., 1973. ‘Les possibilités de l'analyse pollinique en Syrie et au Liban’, Paléorient, 1, 39–47.Google Scholar
van Loon, M. N., 1967. ‘The Tabqa reservoir survey 1964’, Annales Archéologiques Arabes Syriennes, 17, 1–27.Google Scholar
van Loon, M. N., 1968. ‘The Oriental Institute excavations at Mureybit, Syria: preliminary report on the 1965 campaign’, Journal of Near Eastern Studies, 27, no. 4, 265–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noy, T., Legge, A. J. and Higgs, E. S., 1973. ‘Recent excavations at Nahal Oren, Israel’, PPS, 39, 75–99.Google Scholar
Payne, S., 1969. ‘A metrical distinction between sheep and goat metacarpals’. In Ucko, P. J. and Dimbleby, G. W. (ed.), The Domestication and Exploitation of Plants and Animals, 295–305. Duckworth, London.Google Scholar
Payne, S., 1972. ‘Partial recovery and sample bias: the results of some sieving experiments’. In Higgs, E. S. (ed.), Papers in Economic Prehistory, 49–64. University Press, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Rihaoui, A. K., 1965. ‘Etude préliminaire sur la sauvegarde des monuments dans la région du barrage de l'Euphrate’, Les Annales Archéologiques de Syrie, 15, no. 1, 99–111.Google Scholar
Rust, A., 1950. Die Hòhlenfunde von Jabrud (Syrien). Karl Wachholtz, Neümunster.Google Scholar
Schaeffer, C. F. A., 1962. ‘Les fondements préhistoriques d'Ugarit’. In Schaeffer, C. F. A. (ed.), Ugaritica, 4 Paris.Google Scholar
Scheibe, A., 1934. ‘Über Vorkommen und Nutzungsweise der Wilderbse und Wildbohne in Anatolien’, Ziichter, 6, 234–40.Google Scholar
Struever, S., 1968. ‘Flotation techniques for the recovery of small-scale archaeological remains’, American Antiquity, 33, no. 3, 353–62.Google Scholar
van Zeist, W. and Casparie, W. A., 1966. ‘Wild einkorn and barley from Tell Mureybit in Northern Syria’, Acta Botanica Neerlandica, 17, 44–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar