Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T13:25:10.667Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

From Worsaae to Childe: The Models of Prehistory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2014

Glyn Daniel
Glyn Daniel
Affiliation:
St. John's College, Cambridge
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the first of his three chapters forming Aspects of Prehistory (1970), Grahame Clark discussed one important aspect of prehistoric archaeology about which he has not hitherto written much, namely the historical development of that branch of historical science which, by his own researches in the last forty-five years, he has done so much to further. This chapter, the first of three lectures he delivered at Berkeley in the spring of 1970, is entitled ‘The Relevance of World Prehistory’, and is mainly concerned with listing the story of the discovery of archaeological facts. The interpretation of archaeological facts is of equal importance and in this paper I am concerned briefly with some aspects of the history of archaeological theory and interpretation, and more particularly with the changing models of thought used by prehistorians.

Here, we need not go further back than the three-age technological model of C. J. Thomsen. Before that we note the mythological models of the medieval and later antiquaries who floated Trojans and Phoenicians and the sons of Noah across their invented prehistory, and the literary and theological models of the later antiquaries of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries who, eschewing invention, sought prehistorical information in the Bible and in Classical writers, and made over our prehistoric monuments to the Druids, and our gravels to an Universal Deluge.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , December 1971 , pp. 140 - 153
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Adams, W. Y., 1968. ‘Invasion, Diffusion, Evolution?’ Antiquity, XLII, 194–215.Google Scholar
Ashbee, P., 1970. The Earthen Long Barrow in Britain. London.Google Scholar
Becker, C. J., 1948. Mosefunde Lerkar fra Yngre Stenalder: Studier Over Tragbaegerkulturen i Denmark. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Blance, B., 1961. ‘Early Bronze Age Colonists in Iberia’, Antiquity, XXXV, 192–202.Google Scholar
Caldwell, J. R., 1966. Editorial in (ed. Caldwell, ) New Roads to Yesterday: Essays in Archaeology. New York.Google Scholar
Chang, K., 1970. ‘The Beginnings of Agriculture in the Far East’, Antiquity, XLIV, 175–185.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G., 1932. ‘Scottish Megalithic Tombs and their affinities’, Trans. Glasgow Arch. Soc., III, 120–37.Google Scholar
Childe, V. G., 1936. Man Makes Himself. London.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D., 1966. ‘The Invasion Hypothesis in British Archaeology’, Antiquity, XL, 172–89.Google Scholar
Condorcet, , 1795. Esquisse d'un tableau historique des progrès de l'esprit humain. Paris.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. E., 1950. A Hundred Years of Archaeology. London.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. E., 1962. The Idea of Prehistory. London.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. E., 1966. Man Discovers His Past. London.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. E., 1967a. The Origins and Growth of Archaeology. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. E., 1967b. ‘Northmen and Southmen’, Antiquity, XLI, 313–7.Google Scholar
Daniel, G. E., 1968. The First Civilisations. London.Google Scholar
Fergusson, J., 1872. Rude Stone Monuments in all Countries: their Age and Uses. London.Google Scholar
Forde, C. D., 1930. ‘The Early Cultures of Atlantic Europe’, American Anthropologist, XXXII, 19–100.Google Scholar
Garrod, D. A. E., 1968. ‘Recollections of Glozel’, Antiquity, XLII, 172–7.Google Scholar
Klemm, G., 1843. Allgemeine Kultur-Geschichte der Menschheit. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Lowie, R. H., 1937. The History of Ethnological Theory. London.Google Scholar
Lynch, B. D. and Lynch, T. F., 1968. ‘The Beginnings of a Scientific Approach to Prehistoric Archaeology in 17th- and 18th-Century Britain’, Southwestern Journal of Anthropology, XXIV, 33–65.Google Scholar
McNeal, R. A., 1972. ‘The Greeks in History and Prehistory’, Antiquity, XLVII.Google Scholar
Montelius, G. O., 1899. Der Orient und Europa. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Neustupny, E., 1970. ‘Whither Archaeology?’, Antiquity, XLIV, 34–39.Google Scholar
Peake, H. J. and Fleure, H. J., 1930. ‘Megaliths and Beakers’, Journal of the Royal Anthropologica Institute, IX.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1953. ‘The Tholos Tomb in Iberia’, Antiquity, XXVII, 1953, 137–43.Google Scholar
Pitt-Rivers, A. L.-F., 1906. The Evolution of Culture and Other Essays (ed. Myres, J. L.). Oxford.Google Scholar
Powell, T. G. E. et al. , 1969. Megalithic Enquiries in the West of Britain. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Pownall, T., 1773. ‘A Description of the Sepulchral monument at New Grange, near Drogheda, in the County of Meath, Ireland’, Archaeologia, II, 236–75.Google Scholar
Pradenne, M. A. Vayson de, 1930. ‘The Glozel Forgeries’, Antiquity, IV, 201–22.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A. C., 1967. ‘Colonialism and Megalithismus’, Antiquity, XLI, 276–88.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A. C., 1968. ‘Wessex without Mycenae’, Annual of the British School of Archaeology at Athens, LXIII, 277–85.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A. C., 1970. ‘New configurations in Old World archaeology’, World Archaeology, II, 199–211.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A. C., 1970–1971. ‘The revolution in prehistory’, The Listener, 1970, 897–900, and 1971, 12–15.Google Scholar
Renfrew, A. C., 1971. The emergence of civilisation. London.Google Scholar
Tylor, E. B., 1881. Anthropology. London.Google Scholar
Wise, Francis, 1742. Further Observations upon the White Horse and Other Antiquities in Berkshire. Oxford.Google Scholar
Worsaae, J. J. A., 1849. The Primeval Antiquities of Denmark (trans, of Danmarks Oldtid by Thoms, W. J.). London.Google Scholar