Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4hhp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T14:06:10.292Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Introduction of Horse-Riding to Temperate Europe: A Contributory Note

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 September 2014

T. G. E. Powell
T. G. E. Powell
Affiliation:
Prehistoric Society
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In his great study of practical ways and means of daily life in prehistoric Europe, our former Hon. Editor, and President, wrote of the archaeology of horse driving and riding as being ‘slight and difficult to interpret’ (Clark, 1952, 301), and these words have remained very true twenty years on. The study of horse drawn vehicles, and of items of bridling and harness, has, nevertheless, received a good deal of attention, and the leading references have been usefully brought together by Piggott (1968, 313–18), and by Littauer (1969, 300). Much more difficult is the matter of the ridden horse in temperate Europe not only for the scarcity of direct skeletal material, and the usually deplorable circumstances of its excavation, but on account of confusion in the application of terminology, zoological and veterinary, no less than in the existence of many traditional assumptions about the identity and characteristics of the earliest horse domesticators, not to speak of the animal itself. From an archaeological point of view, it has been too easy to forget the animal for the trappings, and to appear to assume that any horse could be decked out regardless of shape or size to perform specialized tasks.

In this short contribution, most gladly dedicated to Grahame Clark, an attempt is made to bring together material for an interim statement, and to consider what guide lines in interpretation can be followed in the light of information on horsemanship in adjacent regions of the Ancient World that are considerably better documented.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , December 1971 , pp. 1 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

BIBLIOGRAPHY

Amschler, W., 1949. ‘Ur- und Frühgeschichtliche Haustierfunde aus Öesterreich’, Arch. Austriaca, 3, 1–100.Google Scholar
Anderson, J. K., 1961. Ancient Greek Horsemanship. Berkeley and Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Artamonov, M. I., 1969. Treasures from Scythian Tombs. London.Google Scholar
Behrens, H., 1962. ‘Quellenkritische Bemerkungen zu einigen neolithisch-frühmetallzeitlichen Pferdeskelettfunden in Europa’, 186–9, in Symposium Kiel.Google Scholar
Behrens, H., 1964. Die neolithisch-frühmetallzeitlichen Tierskelettfunde der Alten Welt. Berlin.Google Scholar
Berciu, D., 1969. Arta traco-getica. Bucharest.Google Scholar
Bittel, K. et al. , 1958. Die Hethitischer Grabfunde von Osmankayasi. Berlin.Google Scholar
Boardman, J., Brown, M. A. and Powell, T. G. E. (eds.), 1971. The European Community in Later Prehistory: Studies in Honour of C. F. C. Hawkes. London.Google Scholar
Boessneck, J., 1970. ‘Ein altägyptisches Pferdeskelett’, Mitt. D.A.I. Abt. Kairo, 26, 43–7.Google Scholar
Bökönyi, S., 1968. ‘Data on Iron Age Horses of Central and Eastern Europe’, Amer. Sch. Preh. Res., Peabody Mus. Bull., 25, 3–71.Google Scholar
Clark, J. G. D., 1952. Prehistoric Europe: The Economic Basis. London.Google Scholar
Cowen, J. D., 1967. ‘The Hallstatt Sword of Bronze on the Continent and in Britain’, PPS, 33, 377–454.Google Scholar
Crossland, R. A., 1970. ‘Immigrants from the North’, Cambridge Ancient History, rev. ed., I, chap. xxvii.Google Scholar
Dehn, W., 1970. ‘Ein Keltisches Häuptlingsgrab aus Hallstatt’, 72–81, in RGZM, 1970.Google Scholar
Drower, M. S., 1969. ‘The domestication of the horse’, 471–8, in Ucko, and Dimbleby, (eds.), 1969.Google Scholar
Emery, W. B., 1960. ‘A Preliminary Report on the Excavations of the Egypt Expl. Soc. at Buhen 1958–9’, Kush, 8, 7–10.Google Scholar
Filip, J. (ed.), 1970. Actes du VII congrès internat. des sciences pré- et protohistoriques, Prague 1966.Google Scholar
Florescu, R., 1968. Arta Dacilor. Bucharest.Google Scholar
Foster, I. Ll. and Alcock, L. (eds.), 1963. Culture and Environment: Essays in Honour of Sir Cyril Fox. London.Google Scholar
Gabrovec, S., 1966. ‘Zur Hallstattzeit in Slovenien’, Germania, 44, 1–48.Google Scholar
Gallus, S., 1934. ‘Die figuralverzierten Urnen vom Soproner Burgstall’, Archaeologica Hungarica, 13.Google Scholar
Gimbutas, M., 1956. ‘The Prehistory of Eastern Europe, I’, Amer. Sch. Preh. Res. Peabody Mus. Bull., 20.Google Scholar
Goetze, A., 1962. Review of Kammenhuber, 1961, J. Cuniform St., 16, 30b–35b.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herre, W. and Röhrs, M., 1958. ‘Die Tierreste aus den Hethitiergräbern von Osmankayasi’, 60–79, in Bittel, et al. , 1958.Google Scholar
Jettmar, K., 1967. Art of the Steppes. London.Google Scholar
Kammenhuber, A., 1961. Hippologia Hethitica. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Kromer, K., 1959. Das Gräberfeld von Hallstatt. Firenze.Google Scholar
Kupper, J.-R., 1957. ‘Les nomades en Mésopotamie au temps des rois de Mari’, Bibl. fac. phil. et lettr. Univ. Liège, 142.Google Scholar
Kupper, J.-R., 1970. ‘Northern Mesopotamia and Syria’, Cambridge Ancient History, rev. ed., II, chap. i.Google Scholar
Littauer, M. A., 1969. ‘Bits and Pieces’, Antiquity, 43, 289–300.Google Scholar
Mayrhofer, M., 1966. Die Indo-Arier im Alien Vorderasien. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Megaw, J. V. S., 1970. Art of the European Iron Age. Bath.Google Scholar
Moorey, P. R. S., 1970. ‘Pictorial Evidence for the History of Horse-Riding in Iraq before the Kassite Period’, Iraq, 32, 36–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Necrasov, O. C., 1971. ‘Die neolitischen Equiden Rumäniens und das Problem der Domestikation des Pferdes’, 289–90, in Wellmann, (ed.), 1971.Google Scholar
Nobis, G., 1971. ‘Wer ist Wildahn unserer Hauspferde?’, 281–4, in Wellmann, (ed.), 1971.Google Scholar
Noble, D., 1969. ‘The Mesopotamian onager as a draught animal’, 485–8, in Ucko, and Dimbleby, (eds.), 1969.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1965. Ancient Europe. Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Piggott, S., 1968. ‘The Earliest Wheeled Vehicles and the Caucasian Evidence’, PPS, 34, 266–318.Google Scholar
Potratz, J. A. H., 1966, Die Pferdetrensen des Alten Orient. Rome.Google Scholar
Powell, T. G. E., 1963. ‘Some Implications of Chariotry’, 153–63, in Foster, and Alcock, (eds.), 1963.Google Scholar
Powell, T. G. E., 1971. ‘From Urartu to Gundestrup, the agency of Thracian metalwork’, in Boardman, et al. (ed.), 1971, 181–210.Google Scholar
RGZM, 1970. Römisch-Germanisches Zentralmuseum Mainz, Ausstellungskataloge, 4: Krieger und Salzherren.Google Scholar
Sandars, N. K., 1968. Prehistoric Art in Europe. Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Sandars, N. K., 1970. ‘Cimmerians, Phrygians, Achaemenians and South-East Europe’, in Filip, (ed.), 1970, 873–7Google Scholar
Symposium Kiel, 1962. Zur Domestikation und Frühgeschichte der Haustiere. Internationales Symposium in Kiel 1961, Zeitschrift für Tierzüchtung und Züchtungsbiologie, 76.Google Scholar
Tringham, R., 1969. ‘Animal Domestication in the Neolithic cultures of the south-west part of European USSR’, 381–92, in Ucko, and Dimbleby, (eds.), 1969.Google Scholar
Ucko, P. J. and Dimbleby, G. W. (eds.), 1969. The domestication and exploitation of plants and animals. London.Google Scholar
Wellmann, I. (ed.), 1971. Résumés des communications presentées, III congrès internat. des musées d'agriculture. Budapest, Magyar Mezögazdasagi Múzeum.Google Scholar
Zalkin, V. I., 1970. ‘The earliest domesticated animals of eastern Europe’ (Russian text only), MIA, 161.Google Scholar
Zeuner, F. E., 1963. A History of Domesticated Animals. London.Google Scholar