Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T13:15:14.663Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Late Bronze Age Settlement on Itford Hill, Sussex

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

G. P. Burstow ,
G. A. Holleyman  and
Hans Helbaek
G. P. Burstow
Affiliation:
National Museum, Copenhagen
G. A. Holleyman
Affiliation:
National Museum, Copenhagen
Hans Helbaek
Affiliation:
National Museum, Copenhagen
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the years between the two World Wars considerable research was done by Sussex archaeologists on the Late Bronze Age settlements of the South Downs (figs, 1 and 30). Several habitation sites were partly excavated, notably Park Brow near Worthing by Mr Garnet R. Wolseley in 1924, New Barn Down, Harrow Hill near Worthing by Dr E. Cecil Curwen in 1933, and Plumpton Plain, near Brighton, by Dr E. Cecil Curwen and Mr G. A. Holleyman in 1934, and an analysis of the pottery from these sites by Professor C. Hawkes has provided a typological and chronological basis for subsequent research.

After World War II the authors, inspired by the work of Dr J. F. S. Stone on the Deverel-Rimbury Settlement on Thorny Down and of Dr G. Bersu at Little Woodbury, decided to strip completely a small group of earthworks of probable Late Bronze Age date on Itford Hill near Lewes. In the spring of 1949 the site, together with the adjacent linear earthwork and group of lynchets, was surveyed by Mr E. W. Holden and Mr G. A. Holleyman. Excavations were carried out for each of five seasons (1949–1953) by means of volunteers and with the financial backing of the Brighton and Hove Archaeological Society.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 23 , January 1958 , pp. 167 - 212
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1958

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 167 note 1 Archaeologia, LXXVI, 1927, pp. 1–6, 14–16Google Scholar.

page 167 note 2 SAC, LXXV, 1934, pp. 137–70Google Scholar.

page 167 note 3 PPS, I, 1935, pp. 16–38Google Scholar.

page 167 note 4 Ibid., pp. 39–59.

page 167 note 5 A full list of all L.B.A. sites in the County of Sussex can be found in Curwen, 's Archaeology of Sussex. New edition 1954, pp. 169–93Google Scholar. Also see pp. 210–11 of this report.

page 168 note 1 PPS, VII, 1941, pp. 114–33Google Scholar.

page 168 note 2 PPS, VI, 1940, pp. 30–111Google Scholar.

page 168 note 3 The site was first discovered in 1937 by Mr G. A. Holleyman and the late Mr V. Gerard Smith of Seaford.

page 168 note 4 Antiquity I, 1927, pp. 54–65Google Scholar; VI, 1932, 24–34: Aspects of Archaeology (Essays presented to DrCrawford, O. G. S., ed, W. F. Grimes, London, 1951), p. 93Google Scholar.

page 172 note 1 PPS, I, 1935, pp. 26–7Google Scholar.

page 172 note 2 SAC, LXXV, 1934, pp. 145–9Google Scholar.

page 173 note 1 SAC, LXXV, 1934, pp. 148–9Google Scholar.

page 191 note 1 Archaeologia, LXXVI, 1926, pp. 1–4Google Scholar.

page 191 note 2 Ant. J., XIII, 1933, pp. 130–1Google Scholar.

page 191 note 3 Wattle and daub was almost certainly used for walling purposes in pre-historic and Roman period huts and its use continued right through to the Middle Ages and even later (see Salzman's Building in England down to 1540, chapter XII, ‘Wattle and daub’). It could only have been used on circular huts of the Itford Hill type, if the roofs had projecting eaves and we assume anyway that this was so. If the daub was a cob-like mixture of clay and chalk all traces of it could have disappeared, but it seems strange that out of 13 huts not a single scrap of evidence survived.

page 191 note 4 Bulleid, and Gray, , The Glastonbury Lake Village, vol. I, 1911, pp. 55–7, 132–6Google Scholar.

page 191 note 5 Bulleid, and Gray, , The Meare Lake Village, vol. I, 1948, pp. 10–11Google Scholar.

page 191 note 6 Dr J. F. S. Stone in his description of the huts on Thorny Down notes that the distance between the upright posts was sometimes as much as 6 feet. He suggests that the walls between the posts were made of horizontally laid logs or branches.

page 193 note 1 Dr Curwen (op. cit., pp. 171–2) suggests that the Park Brow huts may have resembled wigwams in shape.

page 194 note 1 It is interesting to note that Bulleid and Gray suggest that some of the huts at Meare Lake Village may have been designed like Indian wigwams. (Bulleid, and Gray, , Meare Lake Villages, vol. I, 1948, p. 11Google Scholar). See also Peate, , The Welsh House, 1944, pp. 46–50Google Scholar, and Folkliv, 1937, for an account of wigwam shaped huts of the Stone Age in Finland, by Prof. Erixon.

page 194 note 2 Sussex Arch. Coll., LXXV, 1934, pp. 141–5Google Scholar.

page 194 note 3 PPS, I, 1935, pp. 21–6Google Scholar.

page 194 note 4 Archaeologia, LXXVI, 1926, pp. 1–4Google Scholar.

page 194 note 5 Sussex Arch. Coll., XCI, 1953, pp. 69–83Google Scholar.

page 194 note 6 PPS, VII, 1941, pp. 117–26Google Scholar.

page 194 note 7 PPS, I, p. 39Google Scholar; Sussex Arch. Coll., LXXXVII, pp. 79, 80Google Scholar.

page 197 note 1 PPS, I, p. 49Google Scholar (fig. 7).

page 197 note 2 Archaeologia, LXXVI, pp. 14–16Google Scholar.

page 197 note 3 PPS, I, pp. 40–43Google Scholar.

page 198 note 1 PPS, I, p. 43Google Scholar (fig. 4).

page 199 note 1 Oxoniensia, XV, 1950, pp. 12–13Google Scholar; PPS, XX, pt. 1, 1954, p. 105Google Scholar.

page 202 note 1 Archaeologia, LXXVI, 1927, pp. 4–5Google Scholar.

page 202 note 2 In a pit in a L.B.A. enclosure on Cock Hill, Dr H. B. A. Ratcliffe-Densham found ten perfect specimens of cylindrical clay loomweights. The clay appears to have a considerable admixture of granulated chalk.

page 202 note 3 Sussex Arch. Coll., LXXII, 1931, pp. 208–9Google Scholar.

page 202 note 4 Among a collection of material which belonged to the late Mr Cecil Vigor and is now housed in the S.A.S. Museum at Lewes, is a L.B.A. clay loom weight reputed to be a surface find from Plumpton Plain, Site A.

page 204 note 1 Sussex Arch. Coll., LXXV, 1934, p. 167Google Scholar.

page 204 note 2 PPS, I, 1935. p. 38Google Scholar.

page 206 note 1 Jessen, K. and Helbaek, H., ‘Cereals in Gt. Britain and Ireland in Prehistoric and Early Historic Times’. Kgl. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Biol. Skr. III, 2, 1944Google Scholar. Helbaek, H., ‘Early Crops in Southern England’, PPS, XVIII, 1952Google Scholar.

page 206 note 2 H. Helbaek, 1952, op. cit., p. 231.

page 206 note 3 Clay, R. C. C., ‘An early Iron Age Site on Fifield Bavant Down’. Wilts. Arch. Nat. Hist. Mag., CXL, 1924, p. 457Google Scholar

page 207 note 1 Holleyman, G. A., ‘Bronze Age Farmstead on Itford Hill, Sussex’, Sussex County Mag., vol. 24, 1950Google Scholar.

page 207 note 2 Trans. St. Albans Architectural and Archaeological Soc. 1953, p. 91Google Scholar.

page 207 note 3 For details on grain and weed seeds and illustrations of H. Helbaek, 1952, op. cit., pp. 207, 209, 214–16, 221–2 and pl. XXII.

page 208 note 1 K. Jessen and H. Helbaek, 1944, op. cit., p. 44 and illustrations, p. 45.

page 208 note 2 This probably did not happen until mediaeval times.

page 208 note 3 Helbaek, Hans, ‘Botanical Study of the Stomach Contents of the Tollund Man’, Aarbøger, 1950, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar; also ‘The Botany of the Vallhager Iron Age Field’ in Stenberger, M., Vallhager. A migration Period Settlement on Gotland, Sweden. Stockholm, 1955Google Scholar; Neuweiler, E., Die Pflanzenwelt in der jungeren Stein- und Bronzezeit der Schweiz. Zürich, 1924Google Scholar.

page 208 note 4 Helbaek, Hans, PPS, XVIII, 1952Google Scholar, Find List B, p. 229.

page 210 note 1 In 1954 when the revised edition of The Archaeology of Sussex appeared, Prof. C. Hawkes had modified his views on the chronology of the L.B.A. in S.E. England. These were put forward by Curwen on pp. 164–5, and all the Sussex sites were classified as L.B. 2A or L.B. 2B. Prof. Hawkes has since reverted to his earlier scheme of chronology set forth in the Plumpton Plain Report.

page 210 note 2 Reproduced by kind permission of DrCurwen, E. C. from his Archaeology of Sussex, p. 170Google Scholar.

page 211 note 1 Curwen, , Archaeology of Sussex, 1954, p. 183Google Scholar.