Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-10T05:55:16.768Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Stone Axes and Flake Tools: Evaluations from Two New Guinea Highlands Societies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 May 2014

Marilyn Strathern
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

When Europeans entered the New Guinea Highlands in the 1930s, they discovered peoples using two main kinds of stone implements—polished axes and simple flake tools. The prominence of the axe has been well documented (S. Buhner, 1964; R. and S. Bulmer, 1964; Salisbury, 1962; Tischner, 1939; Vial, 1940 et al.). Crucial to subsistence, it was also used widely in exchanges and payments of all kinds and had a value as a ceremonial object. This seems to have been the case throughout the Highlands. Nevertheless, there were probably variations in the precise range of uses to which the axe was put, and consequently in its ‘value’. This comment is prompted by a consideration of two societies—Hagen in the Western Highlands and Wiru in the Southern Highlands Districts—whose traditional evaluations of the stone axe seem to have had differing emphases. In the past the axe was probably less important as a ceremonial object to the Wiru than it was to the Hageners, and its use as a tool more limited. The situation seems to have been correspondingly reversed in the case of the flake tool, however, which had generally more importance in Wiru.

Type
Research Article
Information
Proceedings of the Prehistoric Society , Volume 35 , February 1970 , pp. 311 - 329
Copyright
Copyright © The Prehistoric Society 1970

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Bulmer, R. and Bulmer, S., 1962. ‘Figurines and other stones of power among the Kyaka of Central New Guinea’, J. Polynesian Soc., vol. 71, 192–208.Google Scholar
Bulmer, R. and Bulmer, S., 1964. ‘The prehistory of the Australian New Guinea Highlands’, Amer. Anthropologist (special publication on New Guinea, ed. Watson, J. B.), vol. 66, no. 4, 39–76.Google Scholar
Bulmer, S., 1964. ‘Prehistoric stone implements from the New Guinea Highlands’, Oceania, vol. 34, no. 4, 246–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chappell, J., 1966. ‘Stone axe factories in the Highlands of East New Guinea’, Proc. Prehist. Soc., vol. 32, no. 5, 96–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clakk, G., 1965. ‘Traffic in stone axe and adze blades’, The Economic History Review, vol. 18, no. 1, 1–28.Google Scholar
Firth, R., 1967. The Work of the Gods in Tikopia, University of London: the Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Franklin, K. J., 1965. ‘Kewa social organisation’, Ethnology, vol. 4, 408–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godelier, M., 1969. ‘La “Monnaie de Sel” des Baruga de Nouvelle-Guinée’, L'Homme, vol. IX, no. 2, 1–37.Google Scholar
Heider, K. G., 1967. ‘An unusual carved stone from Mount Hagen, New Guinea’, Archaeol. & Phys. Anthr. in Oceania, vol. 2, no. 3, 186–9.Google Scholar
Hughes, I. ‘Some aspects of traditional trade in the New Guinea Highlands’. Paper delivered to 41st A.N.Z.A.A.S. Congress, Adelaide, 1969.Google Scholar
Salisbury, R. F., 1962. From Stone to Steel, Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Sinclair, J., 1969. The outside man: Jack Hides of Papua, Melbourne, Lansdowne.Google Scholar
Strathern, A. J., 1966. Ceremonial exchange in the Mount Hagen area. Unpublished PhD. dissertation, Cambridge University.Google Scholar
Strathern, A. J., 1968. ‘Sickness and frustration: variations in two New Guinea Highlands societies’, Mankind, vol. 6, no. 11, 545–51.Google Scholar
Strathern, A. J., 1969. ‘Kor-nga poklambo or ui mbo? Hagen magic stones’, Archaeol. & Phys. Anthr. in Oceania, vol. IV, no. 2, 91–96.Google Scholar
Strathern, A. J. and Strathern, A. M. (Forthcoming.) Self-decoration in Mount Hagen.Google Scholar
Strathern, A. M., 1965. ‘Axe types and quarries’, J. Polynesian Soc., vol. 74, no. 2, 182–91.Google Scholar
Strauss, H., 1962. Die Mi-Kultur der Hagehberg-Stämme im östlichen Zentral-Neuguinea, Hamburg, Cram, de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
Tischner, H., 1939. Eine Ethnographische sammlung aus dem östlichen Zentral-Neuguinea, Hamburg, Friederichsen, de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
Vial, L. G., 1940. ‘Stone axes of Mount Hagen, New Guinea’, Oceania, vol. 11, no. 2, 158–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicedom, G. F. and Tischner, H., 1943–1948. (3 vols.). Die Mbowamb, Hamburg, Cram, de Gruyter & Co.Google Scholar
White, J. P., 1967a. ‘Ethno-archaeology in New Guinea: two examples’, Mankind, vol. 6, no. 9, 409–14.Google Scholar
White, J. P., 1967b. Taim bilong bipo: investigations towards a prehistory of the Papua-New Guinea Highlands. Unpublished PhD. dissertation, Australian National University.Google Scholar
White, J. P., 1968. ‘Fabricators, outils écaillés or scalar cores?’ Mankind, vol. 6, no. 12, 658–66.Google Scholar
Williams, F. E., 1940. ‘Natives of Lake Kutubu, Papua’, Oceania, vol. 11, nos. 2, 3, 121–57, 259–94, et seq.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wurm, S. A., 1964. ‘Australian New Guinea Highlands Languages and the distribution of their typological features’, Amer. Anthropologist (special publication on New Guinea, ed. Watson, J. B.), vol. 66, no. 4, 77–97.Google Scholar