Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ttngx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T02:19:11.041Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2012 PRESIDENTIAL, US HOUSE, AND US SENATE FORECASTS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 January 2013

Carl E. Klarner*
Affiliation:
Indiana State University

Extract

For the second presidential election in a row the prediction of the “Klarner Model” was within half a percent of the actual result. This model forecast that Obama would receive 51.3% of the two-party vote, while he actually received 51.8%. The model also called all states correctly, with the exception of Florida, which was predicted to be narrowly lost by Obama with 49.7% of the vote. These forecasts were made on July 15, 2012. This success does not indicate the model is better than the other models in the symposium as luck is a major determinant of which model gets closest to the mark. Although the Klarner Model correctly called 49 out of 50 states, that means little in an election where merely calling states on the basis of 2008 results would have called all but two correctly.

Type
Features Symposium: Recap: Forecasting the 2012 Election
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Klarner, Carl E. 2012. “State-Level Forecasts of the 2012 Federal and Gubernatorial Elections.” PS: Political Science and Politics 45 (4): 655–62.Google Scholar