No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
George Bush and the Costs of High Popularity: A General Model with a Current Application
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2013
Extract
People worry about the public-relations presidency: an institutional pattern of action giving high priority to public support, especially as shown by the opinion polls. These worries have been accentuated by actions in the White House and news media. “I don't live by the polls,” Bush told reporters early in 1990, parrying the implication that he did live by them. Daily polls that benefitted the White House were taken during the six months before the Gulf War by the Wirthlin Group (Ronald Reagan's second-term pollster) on behalf of “Citizens for a Free Kuwait.” These included very sophisticated tracking and feedback devices. Bush, in fact, became the first president to mention his own popularity polls in a State of the Union address in January 1992. Yet, Bush could as well have accused reporters of living by the polls. Each change in his public approval ratings was accompanied by featured news stories. At the close of the war, even before the planes had returned to their bases, commentators began speculating on how soon the president's popularity would fall.
Several things stand out from Bush's approval ratings in his first three years in office. His polls were strikingly high in absolute terms and relative to the polls of his predecessors at the same points in their administrations. Another notable feature was that they were more erratic. Where Reagan's polls changed by more than five percentage points only twice in the same period, Bush's changed by this amount 13 times, leading modern presidents in this kind of fluctuation. Bush's approval ratings climbed with the invasion of Panama in January 1990, fell the next month, and then fell further.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1993
References
Brace, Paul, and Hinckley, Barbara. 1991. “The Structure of Approval: Constraints Within and Across Presidencies.” Journal of Politics November:993–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brace, Paul, and Hinckley, Barbara. 1992. Follow the Leader: Opinion Polls and the Modern Presidents. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Greenstein, Fred. 1974. “What the President Means to Americans.” In Choosing the President, ed. Barber, James David. New York: American Assembly.Google Scholar
Hinckley, Barbara. 1990. The Symbolic Presidency: How Presidents Present Themselves. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kernell, Samuel. 1986. Going Public: New Strategies of Presidential Leadership. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Mueller, John. 1970. “Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson.” American Political Science Review March: 18–24.Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut. 1984. “Economics, Politics, and the Cycle of Presidential Popularity.” Political Behavior
6(3):253–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, Charles, and Job, Brian. 1986. “The Presidents and the Political Use of Force.” American Political Science Review June:541–66.Google Scholar
Ostrom: Charles, , and Simon, Dennis. 1985. “Promise and Performance: A Dynamic Model of Presidential Popularity.” American Political Science Review June: 334–58.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, Lyn. 1984. “The Politics of Presidential Speechmaking, 1949–1980.” American Political Science Review December: 971–84.Google Scholar
Simon, Dennis, and Ostrom, Charles. 1989. “The Impact of Televised Speeches and Foreign Travel on Presidential Approval.” Public Opinion Quarterly
53:58–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stimson, James. 1976. “Public Support for American Presidents.” Public Opinion, Quarterly
40:1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar