Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T08:23:39.686Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Impact of Term Limits on Legislative Behavior: An Examination of a Transitional Legislature

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Stanley M. Caress
Stanley M. Caress*
Affiliation:
State University of West Georgia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Twenty-two states have established state legislative term limits since 1990 and several others are considering similar action. Legislative term limits, intended to force a continuous turnover in a legislature's membership, can produce a number of consequences seldom considered in the voluminous rhetorical literature on the subject. Several unanticipated ramifications have occurred in California's political system, for instance, since its adoption of term limits. California's experience suggests that term limits can influence legislators' early retirement rates, as well as the incidence of special elections, and can also produce alternative legislator career paths.

While there is an abundance of conflicting rhetoric surrounding the issue, there is a paucity of empirical research to support the various contentions. Term limit advocates use only theoretical arguments to support their claims that restricting tenure of office makes legislators more sensitive to constituent desires and thus more reflective of public opinion (Jacob 1994). Historical references, but no empirical evidence, serve term limit proponents who suggest that limited incumbent time in office makes legislative bodies more deliberative (Will 1994). Term limit opponents similarly utilize only speculation when arguing that limited tenure of office handicaps effective governing (Cain 1994) and decreases needed policy-making expertise (Eastland 1993; Kesler 1994). None of these claims are supported by reliable, empirically verified data.

Type
Research Article
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 29 , Issue 4 , December 1996 , pp. 671 - 676
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adkisson, John D. 1994. Attorney and Partner, Nossman, Guthner, Knox, & Elliot, Interview, August 19, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
Almanac of California Government & Politics 1983–84. 1983. Sacramento, CA: The California Center.Google Scholar
Almanac of California Government & Politics 1989–90. 1989. 7th Edition, Sacramento, CA: The California Center.Google Scholar
Boeckelman, Keith A. 1994. “An Analysis of the Term Limitation Elections.” Southeastern Political Science Review 22(3):467–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cain, Becky. 1994. “Term Limits: Not the Answer to What Ails Politics.” In The Politics and Law of Term Limits, eds. Crane, Edward H. and Pilon, Roger. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
California Secretary of State's Office. 1994. “Congressional/Legislative District Special Election History,” public document.Google Scholar
Eastland, Terry. 1993. “The Limits of Term Limits.” Commentary 95(2):53–55.Google Scholar
Foster, Douglas. 1994. “The Lame-State: Term Limits, Willie Brown, and the Hobbling of California Government,” Harper's Magazine 288:65–74.Google Scholar
Gillam, Jerry. 1994. “Term Limits Taking Big Toll on Legislature,” Los Angeles Times, March 20.Google Scholar
Gladstone, Mark. 1991. “Term Limits Spell End of Old Order,” Los Angeles Times, 27 October.Google Scholar
Hibbing, John R. 1991. “Contours of the Modern Congressional Career.” American Political Science Review 85(2):405–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ingram, Carl. 1994. “Wave of Special Elections Could Become a Flood,” Los Angeles Times, 23 February.Google Scholar
Jacob, Paul. 1994. “From the Voters with Care.” In The Politics and Law of Term Limits, eds. Crane, Edward H. and Pilon, Roger. Washington, DC: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
Jeffe, Shirly Bebitch. 1993. “Rivalries are Growing in Assembly in Attempt to Get to Senate,” Los Angeles Times, 25 July.Google Scholar
Keene, Barry. 1994. Former Majority Leader, California State Senate, Interview, 21 August, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
Kesler, Charles R. 1994. “Bad Housekeeping: The Case Against Congressional Term Limitation, Policy Review, Summer; reprinted in Taking Sides, 9th Ed. McKenna, George & Fiengold, Stanley. Gilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing, 82–89.Google Scholar
Kovnick, Carole. 1994. California State Controller Gray Davis' Office, Interview, August 21, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
Nagler, David. 1994. Legislative Advocate, Nossman, Guthner, Knox, & Elliot, Interview, August 21, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
Price, Charles, and Neves, Helen. 1991. “Term Limits: California's Gift(?) to the Nation-Exporting Discontent,” California Journal 22(12):52–59.Google Scholar
Sanders, Steven R. 1994. Senior Consultant California State Senate Office of Research, Interview, August 18, Sacramento, CA.Google Scholar
Thompson, Joel A., and Moncrief, Gary F. 1993. “The Implications of Term Limits for Women and Minorities: Some Evidence from the States,” Social Science Quarterly 74(2):300–309.Google Scholar
Will, George. 1994. Restoration: Congress, Term-Limits and the Recovery of Deliberate Democracy, Free Press, excerpts in Taking Sides, 9th Ed. McKenna, George and Feingold, Stanley. Gilford, CT: Dushkin Publishing, 79–81.Google Scholar