Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-31T10:13:54.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Postmortems of the 2010 Midterm Election Forecasts: A Post-Mortem on “Will the Republicans Retake the House in 2010?”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2011

Alfred G. Cuzán
Affiliation:
The University of West Florida

Extract

A bare-bones, “economic performance” model of the number of seats won by the president's party in U.S. House of Representatives elections, estimated over the 1914–2008 period, yielded a point forecast of 227 seats for the Democrats, a net loss of 30 seats relative to what the party held at the start of the 111th Congress (if estimated with midterm elections only; 27 seats, if estimated with all elections). However, there was a great deal of uncertainty around that number, to the degree that there was “one chance in three or four that the Democrats [would] lose at least 40 seats,” enough to deprive them of a majority (Cuzán 2010a). Moreover, “the historical distribution of incumbent midterm losses” since 1914 suggested “that the odds of such an outcome occurring [were] around two in five,” so that “although the model forecasts lean against it, a change in party control cannot be dismissed tout court” (Cuzán 2010a, 640–41).

Type
Spotlight
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Cuzán, Alfred G. 2010a. “Will the Republicans Retake the House in 2010?PS: Political Science and Politics 43: 639–41.Google Scholar
Cuzán, Alfred G. 2010b. “Will the Republicans Retake the House in 2010? A Second Look Over the Horizon.” September 15. Working paper. http://uwf.edu/govt/documents/I.B.24-Will%20the%20Republicans%20Retake%20the%20House%20in%202010,%20A%20second%20look%20over%20the%20horizon,%209-25-10.pdf.Google Scholar
Cuzán, Alfred G., and Bundrick, Charles M.. 2005. “Deconstructing the 2004 Presidential Election Forecasts: The Fiscal Model and the Campbell Collection Compared.” PS: Political Science and Politics 38: 255–62.Google Scholar
Cuzán, Alfred G., and Bundrick, Charles M.. 2009. “Forecasting the 2008 Presidential Election: A Challenge for the Fiscal Model.” PS: Political Science and Politics 41: 717–22.Google Scholar
Lawrence, Michael, Goodwin, Paul, OÇonnor, Marcus, and Önkal, Dilek. 2006. “Judgmental Forecasting: A Review of Progress Over the Last 25 Years.” International Journal of Forecasting 22: 493518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGhee, Eric, Nyhan, Brenday, and Sides, John. 2010. “Midterm Postmortem.” Boston Review, November 11. http://www.bostonreview.net/BR35.6/sides.php.Google Scholar
Niskanen, William. 1975. “Bureaucrats and Politicians.” Journal of Law and Economics 18: 617–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peltzman, Sam. 1992. “Voters as Fiscal Conservatives.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 57: 327–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silver, Nate. 2010. “Health Care, Bailout Votes May have Hurt Democrats.” New York Times, November 16. http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/16/health-care-bailout-votes-may-have-hurt-democrats/.Google Scholar