Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-12T02:48:42.277Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Soviet Foreign Policy and the End of the Postwar Era

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Roger E. Kanet
Roger E. Kanet*
Affiliation:
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The patterns of international power established in 1945, which pitted the United States and the Soviet Union against one another in a global competition for power and influence, seem to be dissolving. Though the two countries are still the dominant military powers, they no longer dominate the international landscape as they did only a few years ago. As occurred in the United States more than a decade ago, the Soviet leadership has begun to recognize the objective limitations placed on its ability to control global events (Izyumov and Kortunov, 1988). Evidence of this can be seen in developments in Soviet policy on arms reductions, the Soviet withdrawal of troops from Afghanistan, the encouragement given client states to resolve conflicts in Cambodia and Angola, and the apparent permitting (even encouraging) of greater autonomy among subject nationalities in Eastern Europe and the USSR itself.

Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev explains this policy shift in terms of “new political thinking” that recognizes the realities of global interdependence and the potentially disastrous implications for the human race of global problems such as nuclear warfare or growing ecological damage (Gorbachev, 1986a, pp. 18–19, 55, 64). Gorbachev and other Soviet political leaders have relegated class warfare, the key concept in Marxist socialism for more than a century, to a secondary position as a determinant of Soviet foreign policy (Zagladin, 1988; Plimak, 1987). More important, they argue, is overcoming the threat to human existence posed by global problems.

Type
Glasnost, Perestroiko, and Novoye Myshleniye: Reform in the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe
Information
PS: Political Science & Politics , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , June 1989 , pp. 225 - 232
Copyright
Copyright © The American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aganbegyan, Abel. 1988. The Economic Challenge of Perestroika (edited by Brown, Michael Barratt). Bloomington, Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Albright, David E. 1987. Soviet Policy Toward Africa Revisited. Washington: The Center for Strategic and International Studies, Significant Issues Series, 9(6).Google Scholar
Banerjee, Jyotmirnoy. 1987. “Moscow's Indian Alliance,” Problems of Communism, 36(1): 1–12.Google Scholar
Brown, W. May 30, 1987. “Soviet Union Promises Syria and Libya More Military Aid,” Radio Liberty Research Bulletin, RL 212/86.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey. September 23, 1988. “Gorbachev's ‘New Political Thinking’ and the Formation of Soviet Foreign Policy,” Radio Liberty Research Bulletin, RL 429/88.Google Scholar
Dashichev, Viacheslav. May 18, 1988. “Vostok-Zapad: Poisk novykh otnoshenii. O prioritetakh Vneshnei politiki Sovetskogo Gosudarstva,” Literaturnaia Gazeta, p. 14.Google Scholar
Evangelista, Matthew. 1986. “The New Soviet Approach to Security,” World Policy Journal, 3(4): 561–599.Google Scholar
Foreign and Commonwealth Office. October 1987. “Soviet Interest in Latin America,” Background Brief, London.Google Scholar
Glickham, Charles (pseudonym for Jeffrey Checkel). September 6, 1986. “New Directions for Soviet Foreign Policy,” Radio Liberty Research Bulletin, Supplement 2/86, pp. 1–26.Google Scholar
Gorbachev, Mikhail S. 1986a. “Politicheskii doklad Tsentral'nogo Komiteta KPSS XXVII S'ezdu Kommunisticheskoi Partii Sovetskogo Soiuza. Doklad General'nogo Sekretaria Tsk KPSS Tovarishcha Gorbacheva M.S. 25 Fevralia 1986 goda,” Kommunist, (4): 5–80.Google Scholar
Gorbachev, Mikhail S. July 29, 1986b. “Rech' Tovarishcha Gorbacheva M.S. na Torzestvennom Sobranii posviashchennom Vnycheniiu Vladivostoku Ordena Lenina,” Pravda, pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
Gorbachev, Mikhail S. 1987. Perestroika: New Thinking for Our Country and the World. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Hart, Thomas G. 1987, Sino-Soviet Relations: Re-examining the Prospects for Normalization. Aldershot-Brookfield: Gower Publishing.Google Scholar
Hough, Jerry. 1988. Russia and the West: Gorbachev and the Politics of Reform. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
Ivanov, Vladimir. 1988. “Facing the Ocean (interview conducted by Rostislav Zolotaryov),” New Times, (40): pp. 5–7.Google Scholar
Izyumov, Alexei and Kortunov, Andrei. 1988. “The USSR in the Changing World,” International Affairs (8): pp. 46–56.Google Scholar
Kim, Roy. 1987. “Gorbachev's Challenge to Japan,” Atlantic Community Quarterly 25(3): 351–366.Google Scholar
Kimura, Hiroshi. 1987. “Soviet Focus on the Pacific,” Problems of Communism, 36(3): 1–16.Google Scholar
Kimura, Hiroshi. 1988. “Gorbachev's ‘New Thinking’ and the Asian-Pacific Region,” in Juviler, Peter and Kimura, Hiroshi, eds., Gorbachev's Reforms: U.S. and Japanese Assessments. New York: Aldine De Gruyter, pp. 149–170.Google Scholar
Kolodziej, Edward A. and Kanet, Roger E.. 1988. “L'Union Sovietique et le Monde en Developpment: Thermidor dans le Combat Revolutionnaire,” Revue d'Etudes Comparatives Est-Ouest, 19(2): 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lukin, Vladimir. 1988. “Time for Action: The Krasnoyarsk Initiatives,” New Times, (39): 5–6.Google Scholar
Manning, Robert A. 1987–1988. “Moscow's Pacific Future,” World Policy Journal, 5(1): 55–78.Google Scholar
Michaels, Julia. October 1, 1987. “Shevardnadze's visit to Brazil Brings Talk of Apples Oranges—and Increased Trade,” The Christian Sciences Monitor, pp. 7, 8.Google Scholar
Mukerjee, Dilip. 1987. “Indo-Soviet Economic Ties,” Problems of Communism, 36(1): 13–25.Google Scholar
Plimak, E. K. 1987. “Novoe myshlenie i perspektivy sotsial'nogo obnovleniia mira,” Voprosy filosofii, (6): 73–89.Google Scholar
Savigear, Peter. 1988. Cold War or Detente in the 1980s: The International Politics of American-Soviet Relations. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Simon, Sheldon W. 1988. “The Soviet Union and Southeast Asia: The Vietnam Connection,” in Kolodziej, Edward A. and Kanet, Roger E., eds. The Limits of Soviet Power in the Third World: Thermidor in the Revolutionary Process. London: Macmillan; Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, pp. 149–170.Google Scholar
Snyder, Jack. 1988. “Limiting Offensive Conventional Forces: Soviet Proposals and Western Options,” International Security, 12(4): 48–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SSSR, Ministerstvo Vneshnei Torgovli. 1983; 1986. Vneshniaia Torgovlia SSSR. Moscow: “Finansy i Statistika,” for the appropriate years.Google Scholar
Taubman, Philip. November 5, 1988. “Moscow Suspends Pullout of Its Afghanistan Forces,” New York Times, pp. 1, 4.Google Scholar
Wettig, Gerhard. 1987. “A New Soviet Approach to Negotiating on Arms Control,” Berichte des Bundesinstituts fur ostwissenschaftliche und internationale Studien (2): 1–19.Google Scholar
Zagladin, Vadim. 1988. “An Arduous But Necessary Path (The Destinies of New Thinking), International Affairs (9): 34–36.Google Scholar
Zhurkin, Vitalii, Karaganov, Sergei and Kortunov, Andrei. 1987a. “O razumnoi dostatochnostik” SShA, (12): 11–21.Google Scholar
Zhurkin, Vitalii, Karaganov, Sergei, and Kortunov, Andrei. 1987b. “Reasonable Sufficiency—or How to Break the Vicious Circle,” New Times, (40): 13–15.Google Scholar