Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wzw2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-09T23:55:46.962Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The logical problem of the incarnation: a new solution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 May 2022

Joshua R. Sijuwade Open the ORCID record for Joshua R. Sijuwade [Opens in a new window]
Joshua R. Sijuwade*
Affiliation:
London School of Theology, Northwood, London, HA6 2UW, UK
*
Email: joshua.sijuwade@lst.ac.uk
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article aims to provide a new solution to the Logical Problem of the Incarnation by proposing a novel metaphysical reconstrual of the method of reduplicative predication. This reconstrual will be grounded upon the metaphysical thesis of ‘Ontological Pluralism, proposed by Kris McDaniel and Jason Turner, and the notion of an ‘aspect’ proposed by Donald L. M. Baxter. Utilising this thesis and notion will enable the method of reduplicative predication to be further clarified, and the central objection that is often raised against this approach can be successfully answered.

Keywords

aspectsincarnationontological pluralismreduplicative predication
Type
Original Article
Information
Religious Studies , Volume 59 , Special Issue 2: Special issue featuring: Shifting perspectives in African philosophy of religion , June 2023 , pp. 202 - 222
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2022. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, MM (2009) Christ as god-man, metaphysically construed. In Rea, M (ed.), Oxford Readings in Philosophical Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 239–263.Google Scholar
Armstrong, D (1997) A World of States of Affairs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, DLM (1999) The discernibility of identicals. Journal of Philosophical Research 24, 37–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, DLM (2001) Instantiation as partial identity. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79, 449–464.Google Scholar
Baxter, DLM (2014) Identity, discernibility and composition. In Baxter, D and Cotnoir, A (eds), Composition as Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 244–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, DLM (2016) Aspects and the alteration of temporal simples. Manuscrito 39, 169–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, DLM (2018a) Self-differing, aspects, and Leibniz's law. Noûs 52, 900–920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, DLM (2018b) Oneness, aspects, and the neo-Confucians. In Ivanhoe, P, Flanagan, O, Harrison, V, Sarkissian, H and Schwitzgebel, E (eds), The Oneness Hypothesis: Beyond the Boundary of Self. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baxter, DLM (2018c) Social complexes and aspects. ProtoSociology 35, 155–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernstein, S (2021) Ontological pluralism about non-being. In Bernstein, S and Goldschmidt, T (eds), Non-being: New Essays on the Metaphysics of Nonexistence. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Builes, D (2019) Pluralism and the problem of purity. Analysis 79, 394–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, R (2011) The Incarnation. In Flint, TP and Rea, M (eds), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophical Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 452–75.Google Scholar
Campbell, K (1990) Abstract Particulars. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fisher, ARJ (2020) Abstracta and abstraction in trope theory. Philosophical Papers 49, 41–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giannotti, J (2021) The identity theory of powers revised. Erkenntnis 86, 603–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, J (2011) Introduction. In Marmodoro, A and Hill, J (eds), The Metaphysics of the Incarnation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–19.Google Scholar
Lewis, D (1983) New work for a theory of universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61, 343–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, K (2009) Ways of being. In Chalmers, D, Manley, D and Wasserman, R (eds), Metametaphysics: New Essays on the Foundations of Ontology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 290–319.Google Scholar
McDaniel, K (2010) A return to the analogy of being. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 813, 688–717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDaniel, K (2017) The Fragmentation of Being. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merricks, T (2019) The only way to be. Noûs 53, 593–612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, TV (2009) The metaphysics of god. In Rea, M (ed.), Oxford Readings in Philosophical Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 211–24.Google Scholar
Papal Encyclicals (n.d.) The Council Of Ephesus–431 A.D. – Papal Encyclicals. [online] Available at https://www.papalencyclicals.net/councils/ecum03.htm (Accessed 21 December 2021).Google Scholar
Pawl, T (2016) In Defense of Conciliar Christology: A Philosophical Essay. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, T (2007) Parthood. Philosophical Review 116, 51–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sider, T (2011) Writing the Book of the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sijuwade, J (2021) Divine simplicity: the aspectival account. European Journal for Philosophy of Religion, 1–37.Google Scholar
Sumner, D (2014) Karl Barth and the Incarnation Christology and the Humility of God. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.Google Scholar
Tanner, N (1990) Decrees of the Ecumenical Councils, vol. 1: Nicene I To Lateran V. Washington D.C.: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, J (2010) Ontological pluralism. Journal of Philosophy 107, 5–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J (2012) Logic and ontological pluralism. Journal of Philosophical Logic 41, 419–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J (2014) Donald Baxter's composition as identity. In Baxter, D and Cotnoir, A (eds), Composition as Identity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, J (2020) Ontological pluralism. In Bliss, R and Miller, JTM (eds), The Routledge Handbook of Metametaphysics. New York: Routledge, pp. 184–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, DC (1953) On the elements of being II. Review of Metaphysics 7, 171–192.Google Scholar
Williams, DC (1986) Universals and existents. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar