¹ Verba, Sidney, reviewing Clifford Geertz, ed., Old Societies and New States: A Quest for Modernity in Asia and Africa, in American Political Science Review, LVIII (March 1964), 110.Google Scholar Cf. Halpern, Manfred, “Toward Further Modernization of the Study of New Nations,” World Politics, XVII (October 1964), 161.Google Scholar

² Hodgkin, Thomas, Nationalism in Colonial Africa (London 1936), 44.Google Scholar

³ Mason, Philip, The Men Who Ruled India (London 1953, 1954)Google Scholar; SirFurse, Ralph, Aucuparius (London 1962)Google Scholar; Heussler, Robert, Yesterday's Rulers (Syracuse 1963).Google Scholar

⁴ The Official Mind of Indirect Rule: Tanganyika 1924–1939, Institute of Commonwealth Studies (London 1964).Google Scholar

⁵ Kautsky, J. H., ed., Political Change in Underdeveloped Countries (New York 1962), 113Google Scholar: “In this fashion, the industrialization sponsored by the totalitarianism of the intellectuals may yet, in the future, convert that system into one in which most of the groups of the new society have access to representation in the governmental decisionmaking process. …”

⁶ Mary Matossian, “Ideologies of Delayed Industrialization,” in Kautsky, 264: “Democracy must be introduced into a country in two stages. In the first stage, a single ‘all-people's’ party of the most ‘enlightened’ and ‘progressive’ elements of a nation takes over the government and acts as a faculty for educating the masses in democratic ways. At some time in the indefinite future, the masses will be ready for direct self-government and die ‘all-people's’ party will ‘wither away’”—a nice combination of Marxism and attitudes borrowed from the colonial administration.

⁷ See Hovet, Thomas Jr., Africa and the United Nations (London 1963)Google Scholar, and Cruise O'Brien, Conor, “Africa and the United Nations,” Voice of Africa, III (12 December 1963), 13–16Google Scholar, for the impact on theories of international relations.

⁸ Crozier, Brian, The Morning After: A Study of Independence (London 1963).Google Scholar

⁹ Berg, Elliot J., “French West Africa,” in Galenson, W., ed., Labor and Economic Development (New York 1959)Google Scholar; Davies, D. I., “The Politics of the T.U.C.'s Colonial Policy,” Political Quarterly, XXXV (January-March 1964), 23–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar; cf. also the comments on the inappropriateness of a Western concept like elites in Morton-Williams, P., “A Discussion of the Theory of Elites in a West African (Yoruba) Context,” West African Institute of Social and Economic Research, Fourth Annual Conference, Proceedings (Ibadan 1956), 25–32.Google Scholar

¹⁰ “The Underdeveloped Study of Political Development,” World Politics, XVI (April 1964), 480–82.Google Scholar

¹¹ Wight, Martin, British Colonial Constitutions (Oxford 1952)Google Scholar; Austin, Dennis, West Africa and the Commonwealth (London 1957)Google Scholar; Hanna, A. J., European Rule in Africa (London 1961)Google Scholar; Mackenzie, W. J. M. and Robinson, K. E., eds., Five Elections in Africa (Oxford 1960).Google Scholar

¹² Representative government was conferred by the British government on Upper and Lower Canada in 1791. Imperial control was, however, firmly maintained. The result was fifty years of strife between the executive and the legislature. The rebellion of 1837 led to the sending out of Lord Durham as Governor-General, the radical Whig magnate. His report of 1839 is held to be the source of British responsible government overseas. A convenient abridged edition with notes, etc., is Coupland, Reginald, The Durham Report (Oxford 1945).Google Scholar

¹³ Houston, W., ed., Constitutional Documents of Canada (Toronto 1891), 296.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Coupland, Durham Report.

¹⁵ Houston, 297.

¹⁶ Austin; Ceylon, , Report of the Special Commission on the Constitution (Chairman: Lord Donoughmore), Cmd. 3131 (London 1928)Google Scholar; Ceylon, , Report of the Commission on Constitutional Reform (Chairman: Lord Soulbury), Cmd. 6677 (London 1945).Google Scholar

¹⁷ Austin; Wight.

¹⁸ See also Report of the Commission of Enquiry into Disturbances in the Gold Coast, 1948 (Chairman: A. Watson), Colonial No. 231 (London 1948)Google Scholar; Report to the Governor by the Committee on Constitutional Reform, 1949 (Chairman: J. H. Coussey), Colonial No. 248 (London 1949).Google Scholar

¹⁹ de Smith, S. A., The New Commonwealth and Its Constitutions (London 1964); see also Wight.Google Scholar

²⁰ “Institutional History of the Gold Coast-Ghana,” in What Are the Problems of Parliamentary Government in West Africa?, Hansard Society (London 1958), 7.Google Scholar

²¹ See Wight; see also the Perham Series on Colonial Legislatures by Joan Wheare, Wight, and others.

²² de Smith, , “Westminster's Export Models: The Legal Framework of Responsible Government,” Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies, 1 (November 1961), 2CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wiseman, H. V., The Cabinet and the Commonwealth (London 1958), 15Google Scholar; Uganda, , Report of the Constitutional Committee, 1959 (Chairman: J. V. Wild), (Entebbe 1959), 33Google Scholar; Jennings, W. Ivor, Democracy in Africa (London 1963), chap. 3, esp. p. 33, for a short statement on the Westminster model.Google Scholar

²³ Origins and Purpose, Central Office of Information for the Commonwealth Relations Office and the Colonial Office (London 1949), 146Google Scholar: “Trusteeship has given place to Junior Partnership. But much remains to be done before the peoples of the colonies, now in different stages of political and economic development, are ready to take their places as citizens of mature, self-governing nations and our objective—copartnership between equals—is attained. For many years to come the peoples of the colonies must rely, to a greater or lesser degree, on outside help. It is our duty to see that this help is forthcoming.”

²⁴ Mason; Furse; Simmons, Jack, ed., From Empire to Commonwealth (London 1949).Google Scholar

²⁵ Wheare, K. C., Constitutional Structure of the Commonwealth (Oxford 1960)Google Scholar, chap. 4; Robinson, K. E., “Constitutional Autochthony in Ghana,” Journal of Commonwealth Political Studies, 1 (November 1961), 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; SirRoberts-Wray, Kenneth, “The Authority of the United Kingdom in Dependent Territories,” in Anderson, J. M. D., ed., Changing Law in Developing Countries (London 1963), 60–62; de Smith, “Westminster's Export Models,” 55ff.Google Scholar

²⁶ Lugard, Lord, The Dual Mandate in British Tropical Africa (London 1922), 26Google Scholar; cf. Mason, , The Birth of a Dilemma (London 1958), 125Google Scholar. SirGoldie, George, with Sir William Mackinnon, was responsible for reviving the old system of Chartered Companies as a device for colonial development. His Royal Niger Company was chartered in July 1886.Google Scholar

²⁷ Huxley, Elspeth, White Man's Country: Lord Delamere and the Maying of Kenya, 2 vols. (London 1935; new ed. 1953).Google Scholar

²⁸ SirJeffries, Charles, The Colonial Office (London 1956), 38.Google Scholar

²⁹ Robinson, , “Colonial Issues and Policies with Special Reference to Tropical Africa,” The Annals, vol. 298 (March 1955), 84.Google Scholar

³⁰ Jeffries, quoting Cmd. 7433 (1948).

³¹ Origins and Purpose, 22n.

³² SirBertram, A., The Colonial Civil Service (London 1930), 34.Google Scholar

³³ Wheare, Joan, The Nigerian Legislative Council (London 1950), 42.Google Scholar

³⁴ Austin, “Institutional History,” esp. 9–10.

³⁵ Hailey, Lord, Native Administration and Political Development in British Tropical Africa (London 1942).Google Scholar

³⁶ Legislative Council Proceedings, 6 December 1950, 1st meeting, 30th session, p. 7. Cf. SirClifford, Hugh in 1923Google Scholar in Joan Wheare, Nigerian Council.

³⁷ Uganda Protectorate: Buganda, Cmd. 9320 (London 1954).Google Scholar

³⁸ The postwar emphasis on local government as the key to political development began with Creech Jones' February despatch: Despatch to Governors of African Territories, 25 February 1947. Was this an alternative to Westminster or a step forward from indirect rule? See Robinson, R. E., “Why ‘Indirect Rule’ has been replaced by ‘Local Government’ in the nomenclature of British Native Administration,” Journal of African Administration, 11 (July 1950), 12–15.Google Scholar

³⁹ Reports on African local government produced by the African Studies Branch of the Colonial Office, Journal of African Administration, the Advisory Panel on Local Government in Africa, and special committees come very fast between 1949 and 1953, and cover especially the Gold Coast, Uganda, Tanganyika, Sierra Leone, Nigeria, East Africa, and East Nigeria.

⁴⁰ Apter, David, “Some Problems of Local Government in Uganda,” Journal of African Administration, XI (January 1959), 236Google Scholar n. For early statements see Cameron, Donald C., My Tanganyika Service and Some Nigeria (London 1939), esp. 114–16Google Scholar; Perham, Margery, Summer School on Colonial Administration (Oxford 1938), 105–6.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Bryant, C. J., Some Problems of Public Administration in Uganda, unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of London (July 1963), 202.Google Scholar

⁴² Mair, Lucy P., “Representative Local Government as a Problem of Social Change,” Journal of African Administration, X (January 1958), 1–24; Mackenzie and Robinson, passim.Google Scholar

⁴³ Kaunda, Kenneth, Zambia Shall Be Free (London 1962), 20–21.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Wallis, C. A. G., Colonial Office, African Studies Branch, Report of an Inquiry into African Local Government in the Protectorate of Uganda (Entebbe 1953), 15.Google Scholar On Buganda, see Low, D. A. and Pratt, R. C., Buganda and British Overrule (London 1960).Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Bryant, 210.

⁴⁶ Furse, 233–44; Jeffries, 63.

⁴⁷ Final Report of the Standing Committee on the Recruitment, Training and Promotion of Africans for Admission to the Higher Posts in the Civil Service (Entebbe 1955), 4.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Laski, Harold J., “The Colonial Civil Service,” Political Quarterly, X (OctoberDecember 1958), 543.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Awolowo, Obafemi, The Path to Nigerian Freedom (London 1947).Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Perham, , “A Restatement of Indirect Rule,” Africa, VII (July 1934), 21.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Native Policies in Africa (London 1936), 12–13Google Scholar: “The element in the indirect rule policy from which it takes its name is the maintenance in their position of the authorities recognised by the native population, as the basis of development of native administration fitted to perform the functions of a modern government.”

⁵² (Cambridge 1936).

⁵³ Alur Society (London 1956), 307.Google Scholar See also Richards, A. I., ed., East African Chiefs (London 1960).Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Wiseman, 79.

⁵⁵ “The Impact of British Education on the Indigenous Peoples of Overseas Territories,” Colonial Review (December 1956), 232.

⁵⁶ An Ajrican Survey (London 1956), 359.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ “Administrative and Departmental Staff—Coordination of Work,” Journal of African Administration, VII (April 1955), 75.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Jennings, W. Ivor and Tambiah, H. W., Development of the Laws and Constitution of Ceylon (London 1952)Google Scholar; Mills, Lennox, Ceylon Under British Rule (London 1933)Google Scholar; Woolf, Leonard, Diaries in Ceylon 1908–11 (London 1963)Google Scholar, esp. the introduction by Saparamadu and Mervyn de Silva.

⁵⁹ Stigand, C. H., Administration in Tropical Africa up to 1914 (London 1914), 60; Woolf, xxii.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ Ibid., xix.

⁶¹ Ibid., xxii.

⁶² Ibid.; Mansergh, N., The Commonwealth and the Nations (London 1948).Google Scholar

⁶³ Report on Indian Constitutional Reforms, Cd. 9109 (London 1918).Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Report of the Indian Statutory Commission, Cmd. 3569 (London 1930).Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Huxley, and Perham, , Race and Politics (London 1956), 10–11.Google Scholar One must temper one's judgment of F. D. Lugard. He surrendered the notion of administrative separation for Kenya by the 1940's (p. 12). Further, on returning to Nigeria in 1912 he had been upset by and was opposed to the extent to which indirect rule had spread in North Nigeria in 1906–11. He was in favor of more direct “ruling,” despite his fiscal memorandum and his “dual mandate.” He was in favor also, for example, of direct taxation. See Bull, M. in Robinson, K. E. and Madden, F., eds., Essays in Imperial Government (Oxford 1963), 47.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ An African Survey.

⁶⁷ Austin, “Institutional History,” 81.

⁶⁸ Engholm, T. F., The Uganda National Assembly, Institute of Commonwealth Studies (London, November 1963).Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Mead, Margaret, New Lives for Old (London 1956), 16.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ Perham, , The Colonial Reckoning (London 1962)Google Scholar; Nkrumah, K., The Autobiography of Kwame Nkrumah (Edinburgh 1957).Google Scholar

⁷¹ Hailey, , Native Administration in the British African Territories, IV (London 1951), 29ff.Google Scholar

⁷² Madden in Robinson and Madden, Essays, 20: “The superficial acceptance of the notion of the common form of government which developed in royal proprietary and corporate colonies is therefore misleading if it comes to the conclusion that it derived from any desire to export the Westminster model. The instruments of government which were devised by the Crown and its advisers were based on feudal and mercantile origins in palatinate or corporation. Perhaps it has relevance to the experience of parliamentary democracy among non-British people, to emphasise that it was the political ethos of Britons in exile which moulded the makeshift institutions they received into a likeness to the British. But there was no exact identity.”

⁷³ p. 42.

⁷⁴ Hailey, Native Administration and Political Development, 44: “The experience elsewhere shows the strength of the influence which a conception of this character can exercise in the day to day policy of administration. It tends almost insensibly to shape its institutions to conform with the final development indicated, even though it may at the moment appear to represent an ideal whose fulfilment must be left for the distant future.”

⁷⁵ Proposals for the Tanganyika Government for a Republic, Government Paper No. 1 (Dar es Salaam 1962)Google Scholar; Nyerere, J., Tanganyika African National Union Conference, 14 January 1963, in African Digest (April 1963), 161.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Robinson, reported in What Are the Problems of Parliamentary Government?, 95.

⁷⁷ Dror, Y., “Muddling Through—‘Science’ or Inertia,” Public Administration Review, XXIV (September 1964), 154Google Scholar; C. Lindblom, “Contexts for Change and Strategy: A Reply,” ibid., 157.

⁷⁸ Two brief discussions might be referred to, both noted after the material of this article was first presented. Packenham, R. A., in “Approaches to the Study of Political Development,” World Politics, XVII (October 1964), 115Google Scholar, has suggested that the relationships in developing societies (so different from those assumed by F. W. Taylor and described here as the conditions of compartmentalism) may be studied by organization theorists to discover what sort of contribution they can make to organizational effectiveness. Secondly, Thompson, V. A., in “Objectives for Development Administration,” Administrative Science Quarterly, IX (July 1964), 108Google Scholar, has written about the limiting conditions and irrelevance for new states of what he calls “control-oriented administration” in a way very similar to what has been said here about compartmentalism, and has indicated the outlines of a possible alternative, most helpfully.