Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-x5gtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-02T04:39:08.260Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Comment on ‘Importance of real-time measurement of sperm head morphology in intracytoplasmic sperm injection’ by Fumiaki Itoi et al.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2023

Krzysztof Lukaszuk
Affiliation:
iYoni app - Fertility app, Lifebite, Olsztyn Invicta Fertility Clinic, Gdansk, Poland Department of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
Izabela Wocławek Potocka
Affiliation:
Department of Gamete and Embryo Biology, Institute of Animal Reproduction and Food Research, Polish Academy of Sciences, Olsztyn, Poland
Grzegorz Jakiel
Affiliation:
1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
Jolanta Olszewska
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecological Nursing, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Gdansk, Poland
Aron Lukaszuk
Affiliation:
Invicta Fertility Clinic, Gdansk, Poland 1st Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland
Anna Knight*
Affiliation:
Invicta Fertility Clinic, Gdansk, Poland
*
Author for correspondence: Anna Knight, Invicta Fertility Clinic, Gdansk, Poland. E-mail: anna.knight@invicta.pl

Summary

We present a commentary on the article published in the Zygote FirstView: ‘Importance of real-time measurement of sperm head morphology in intracytoplasmic sperm injection’ by Fumiaki Itoi and colleagues. We comment on the importance of providing the microscope setup details whenever sperm morphology visualization is discussed. The claim of ×6000–10,000 magnification is misleading as such levels of magnification are impossible to achieve.

Type
Commentary
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

De Vos, A., Van de Velde, H., Bocken, G., Eylenbosch, G., Franceus, N., Meersdom, G., Tistaert, S., Vankelecom, A., Tournaye, H. and Verheyen, G. (2013). Does intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection improve embryo development? A randomized sibling-oocyte study. Human Reproduction, 28(3), 617626. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des435 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Itoi, F., Miyamoto, T., Himaki, T., Honnma, H., Sano, M. and Ueda, J. (2022). Importance of real-time measurement of sperm head morphology in intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Zygote, 30(1), 916. doi: 10.1017/S0967199421000307 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lukaszuk, K., Pastuszek, E. and Samojedny, A. (2016). Comment on: ‘Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) does not improve outcome in patients with two successive IVF-ICSI failures’ by Gatimel et al. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 33(9), 12531254. doi: 10.1007/s10815-016-0746-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilding, M., Coppola, G., di Matteo, L., Palagiano, A., Fusco, E. and Dale, B. (2011). Intracytoplasmic injection of morphologically selected spermatozoa (IMSI) improves outcome after assisted reproduction by deselecting physiologically poor quality spermatozoa. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics, 28(3), 253262. doi: 10.1007/s10815-010-9505-5 CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed