Approximately 10–20% of women experience mood disturbances (depression and/or anxiety) during the perinatal period and up to one-third of these women are treated with an SSRI.Reference Pawluski, Lonstein and Fleming1 SSRIs are prescribed during and following pregnancy to treat or even prevent perinatal depression, with the expectation of benefit to mothers and their children. However, prenatal SSRI exposure has been associated with increased internalising and anxious behaviours in children of mothers treated with an SSRI during pregnancy,Reference Brandlistuen, Ystrom, Eberhard-Gran, Nulman, Koren and Nordeng2–Reference Lupattelli, Wood, Ystrom, Skurtveit, Handal and Nordeng4 raising critical questions about what underlies apparent associations between prenatal SSRI treatment and child behaviour, especially in outcomes beyond infancy and early childhood.Reference Rommel, Bergink, Liu, Munk-Olsen and Molenaar5
Prenatal SSRI exposure and behavioural outcomes
SSRIs readily cross the placenta and fetal blood–brain barrierReference Ewing, Tatarchuk, Appleby, Schwartz and Kim6,Reference Kim, Riggs, Misri, Kent, Oberlander and Grunau7 and given that SSRIs potentiate presynaptic levels of the key neurodevelopmental neurotransmitter serotonin (5-HT) involved with early brain growth and development,Reference Kalueff, Olivier, Nonkes and Homberg8 such exposure raises concerns about whether altered serotonin levels during critical periods of early brain development are associated with long-term behavioural outcomes. Prolonged increased levels of 5-HT in the fetal brain, via negative feedback, constrain development of the 5-HT circuitry, reduce serotonergic tone and ultimately lower 5-HT levels during development.Reference Ansorge, Zhou, Lira, Hen and Gingrich9,Reference Homberg, Schubert and Gaspar10 In animal models, increased central 5-HT levels (e.g. by genetic variations, 5-HT agonists or SSRI exposure) paradoxically constrain the development of the 5-HT system, leading to increased anxiety-like behaviours later in life.Reference Hutchison, Mâsse, Pawluski and Oberlander11
In humans, higher levels of internalising (anxious and depressive) behaviour in 3- to 5-year-olds have been reported in children with prenatal SSRI exposure;Reference Hermansen, Røysamb, Augusti and Melinder12 however, that study did not control for pre- or post-natal maternal mood disturbances. A recent Danish population study reported that maternal prenatal antidepressant treatment was associated with an increased risk of affective disorders across an 18-year follow-up period; however, as similar associations were also found in children whose fathers continued antidepressant treatment across the pregnancy period, these may be related to parental psychopathology, rather than in utero exposure to antidepressants.Reference Rommel, Momen, Molenaar, Liu, Munk-Olsen and Bergink13 In other studies, even when controlling for pre- and postnatal depressive symptoms, internalising behaviours in 3-year-oldsReference Oberlander, Papsdorf, Brain, Misri, Ross and Grunau14 and 6-year-oldsReference Hanley, Brain and Oberlander3 remained associated with prenatal SSRI exposure. Conversely, other studies failed to find significant differences in internalising behaviour between SSRI- (or antidepressant) exposed and non-exposed groups.Reference Grzeskowiak, Morrison, Henriksen, Bech, Obel and Olsen15–Reference Nulman, Koren, Rovet, Barrera, Streiner and Feldman18 Group differences were also not found in relation to conduct problems and affective problems in children less than 6 years old.Reference Marroun H, White, Verhulst and Tiemeier19,Reference Pedersen, Henriksen, Bech, Licht, Kjaer and Olsen20 Importantly, these behavioural outcomes were related to higher levels of either prenatal mental disturbances,Reference Grzeskowiak, Morrison, Henriksen, Bech, Obel and Olsen15 postnatal anxiety and depression symptoms at the time of testingReference Misri, Reebye, Kendrick, Carter, Ryan and Grunau16,Reference Pedersen, Henriksen, Bech, Licht, Kjaer and Olsen20 or a combination of pre- and postnatal depressive symptoms.Reference Nulman, Koren, Rovet, Barrera, Pulver and Streiner17–Reference Marroun H, White, Verhulst and Tiemeier19
A few studies that have also examined anxiety-specific outcomes in children. Prenatal antidepressant exposure has been associated with higher anxiety in 3-year-olds compared with non-exposed siblings, controlling for pre- and postnatal maternal anxiety and depressive symptoms.Reference Brandlistuen, Ystrom, Eberhard-Gran, Nulman, Koren and Nordeng2 Similar results were also found in a longitudinal study that followed mothers and their children from fetal life in utero to 6 years of age, which showed that children with prenatal SSRI exposure had increasing levels of anxiety behaviours compared with children without SSRI exposure, even when controlling for maternal depressive symptoms.Reference Hanley, Brain and Oberlander3 Another longitudinal study found that only SSRI exposure during late pregnancy (28 weeks or more) was associated with increased levels of anxiety at 5 years of age, but not at 18 months or 3 years of age, even when prenatal maternal anxiety and depressive symptoms were taken into account.Reference Lupattelli, Wood, Ystrom, Skurtveit, Handal and Nordeng21 Another study reported no evidence of associations between SSRI exposure and diagnosis of an anxiety disorder in young children;Reference Malm, Brown, Gissler, Gyllenberg, Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki and McKeague22 however, again, pre- and postnatal measures of maternal anxiety or depressive symptoms were not included in the study.
These mixed results may be related to inconsistent measures of prenatalReference Misri, Reebye, Kendrick, Carter, Ryan and Grunau16,Reference Pedersen, Henriksen, Bech, Licht, Kjaer and Olsen20 and current maternal mood disturbances,Reference Grzeskowiak, Morrison, Henriksen, Bech, Obel and Olsen15 which commonly constrains our ability to distinguish the effect of maternal mood disturbances from SSRI exposure in studying internalising and anxiety behaviours in children. Distinguishing the effect of the SSRI from that of maternal mood during pregnancy, which has also been associated with altered child behaviour, namely the issue of ‘confounding by indication’, remains a key challenge.Reference Rommel, Bergink, Liu, Munk-Olsen and Molenaar5 Specifically, maternal psychopathology may assert its effects through other factors, such as environmental stress and less than optimal parenting practices,Reference Rommel, Bergink, Liu, Munk-Olsen and Molenaar5 thereby contributing to the development of internalising and anxiety behaviours. In addition, prenatal SSRI exposure has been associated with increased internalising and anxious behaviours in young children; however, whether this continues into early adolescence is unknown. The current study was undertaken to address these gaps in the literature.
The hypothesis
This study sought to examine the longitudinal patterns of internalising and anxious behaviours from 3 to 12 years of age and determine the relative contributions of maternal prenatal depressive symptoms and current depressive symptoms and of prenatal SSRI exposure to child internalising and anxious behaviours at 3, 6 and 12 years. Internalising behaviours and anxious behaviours were both included as a reflection of a broader range of the child's emotional state (i.e. internalising behaviours) that might include depressive, anxiety and somatic symptoms, apart from anxiety alone. We expected that across childhood and into early adolescence, prenatal SSRI exposure would be associated with persistently higher levels of internalising and anxiety behaviours, even accounting for prenatal and current maternal depressive symptoms. We reported outcomes separately for internalising and anxiety to allow direct comparisons with previous research.
Method
Participants
Mothers were recruited during their second trimester as part of a larger longitudinal cohort study from community (family practice, midwifery) and tertiary referral clinics (reproductive mental health) examining the developmental effects of prenatal exposure to SSRI antidepressants. Participants comprised a volunteer sample of pregnant women who were depressed and treated with an SSRI, depressed and not treated with an SSRI and not depressed or treated with an SSRI. Participants were either diagnosed with a mood disorder and SSRI-treated based on clinical need prior to or during pregnancy, were depressed and chose not to treat their depression with antidepressants or were not depressed during pregnancy. All SSRI-treated mothers had a diagnosed mood disorder of depression and/or anxiety (Table 1) and had started taking medications based on clinical need. Pharmacotherapy included a range of serotonin reuptake inhibitors and serotonin–noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors, collectively referred to in this study as SSRIs. For the present study we relied on self-report of drug use as shown in Table 1 (prenatal treatment days); however, drug levels in this cohort have been reported in a previous publication.Reference Campbell, Collier, Irvine, Brain, Rurak and Oberlander23 Among mothers using SSRIs, the most common drug treatment was paroxetine (Table 2) and the mean duration of exposure for all SSRIs spanned most or almost the entire pregnancy.
Table 1 Descriptive statistics for key variables in mothersa
SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; HAMD, Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression; BDI, Beck Depression Inventory.
a. Clarifications: Asian, those who self-identified as Oriental; White, those who self-identified as Caucasian; Other, those who self-identified as the following: Indian (n = 6), Latin (n = 5), Oriental/White (n = 3), Native North American Indian (n = 2), and one mother in each of the following self-identifying categories: Filipino/Polynesian, Black, Greek, Israeli, Eurasian, Jewish, West Indian, and preferred not to respond; SSRI treatment days, number of days of prenatal SSRI treatment (range: 41–294 days), no information was collected on timing of treatment but most mothers were taking SSRIs at the time of conception; prenatal smoking: Yes means <20 cigarettes per day; prenatal alcohol use, maternal alcohol consumption in single drinks during entire pregnancy; CBCL above threshold, number and percentage of participants with a T-score of 70 or higher on the CBCL; SCARED above threshold risk, number and percentage of participants with a total score of 25 or higher, which may indicate the presence of an anxiety disorder.
b. χ2 value.
c. Cohen (1988) proposed guidelines of effect sizes for small, medium and large effects for both individual differences (Pearson's r = 0.10, 0.30 and 0.50, respectively) and group differences (Cohen's d or Hedges' g = 0.20, 0.50 and 0.80).
d. Phi value.
e. As the number of the computed expected clinical cases in the SSRI group was less than 5, Fisher's exact test is reported; no effect size can be computed.
Table 2 Specific maternal selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), prenatal dose and length of prenatal exposure
Inclusion criteria for this study were singleton pregnancy, confirmed gestational age, ability to give informed consent and no fetal anomalies detected by ultrasound. Exclusion criteria were bipolar disorder, illicit drug use and significant maternal medical, obstetrical or fetal conditions. Written informed consent was obtained from all mothers. The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. All procedures involving human participants were approved by the University of British Columbia/Children's & Women's Health Centre of British Columbia Research Ethics Board (UBC C&W REB).
We had 254 mothers contact us to express interest in the study. Of these, 21 were excluded from the study (too far along in pregnancy (n = 14), miscarried (n = 4), twin pregnancy (n = 2), recreational drug user (n = 1)) and 42 chose to withdraw from the study (no reason given (n = 22), lived or delivered outside of study area (n = 9), too much time commitment (n = 7), ultrasound perceived as dangerous (n = 4)). Of the original 191 mothers studied up to delivery, outcomes for this study included 147 mother–child dyads at 3 years (61 male children, 86 female), 145 dyads at 6 years (65 males, 80 females) and 112 dyads at 12 years (47 males, 65 females). Of the original 191 mothers (76 mothers with prenatal SSRI treatment), there were 147 mothers at 3 years (59 mothers with prenatal SSRI treatment), 145 mothers at 6 years (56 mothers with prenatal SSRI treatment) and 112 mothers at 12 years (38 mothers with prenatal SSRI treatment). In terms of which mothers continued SSRI treatment over time, of the original 76 prenatal SSRI-treated mothers, at 3 years 43 of 59 (72.9%), at 6 years 39 of 56 (69.6%) and at 12 years 29 of 38 (76.3%) continued SSRI treatment. Of the original 115 mothers not depressed/not treated with an SSRI during pregnancy, 8 of 88 at 3 years (9.1%), 7 of 89 (7.9%), at 6 years and 11 of 74 (14.9%) at 12 years subsequently started an SSRI. Differences in prenatal depression symptoms between mothers who participated and mothers who dropped out or where we were not able to obtain child behaviour reports were examined. Mothers who participated at 12 years were less depressed prenatally (Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score in the third trimester: mean 6.32, s.d. = 5.57) than mothers who withdrew or had missing data (mean 8.95, s.d. = 5.93; t = −3.14, P = 0.002). However, there was no significant difference in the proportion of mothers who had been treated with an SSRI during pregnancy and participated at 12 years compared with mothers who had been treated with an SSRI during pregnancy and who withdrew or had missing data (χ 2(1) = 4.10, P > 0.05).
To examine possible bias in our study due to missing data, we conducted scenario-based quantitative bias analysis.Reference Lash, Fox and Fink24 We assumed the following scenarios for the two groups of children at 12 years of age (with and without SSRI exposure) who had dropped out or had missing data: (a) no children met the clinical threshold for anxiety symptoms, (b) 31.4% of children met the clinical threshold for anxiety symptoms (31.4% was selected as this is the estimated lifetime prevalence of any anxiety disorder among 13- to 14-year-olds based on data from 2001 to 2004 in the USAReference Kessler, Chiu, Demler and Walters25) and (c) 100% of children met the clinical threshold for anxiety symptoms. These scenarios were selected to represent both extreme (0%, 100%) and reasonable (31.4% based on current research estimates) possibilities in our missing data. We also conducted the same analyses for internalising symptoms, but we selected 25% as the second scenario as there was no previous research estimating internalising symptoms in adolescents to draw from. Results showed that the number of children meeting the clinical threshold for anxiety and internalising would increase proportionally to the hypothetical scenario examined (details are given in the supplementary material, available at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.623), suggesting that despite the attrition in our sample over time, our results would be similar to a complete cohort with no attrition.
Measures
Maternal mood
Maternal depressed mood was assessed using the a clinician-rated measure, the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAMD)Reference Hamilton26 at the third trimester of pregnancy and at 6 and 12 years postpartum. The HAMD is a clinician-rated measure of depressive symptoms, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depression; total scores were used in the analyses. At 3 years, measures of depressive symptoms were obtained using the 21-item self-reported Beck Depression Inventory (BDI)Reference Beck, Epstein, Brown and Steer27 as we did not have the resources to conduct in-person assessments at this time point. This multiple-choice self-report questionnaire is designed to assess the severity of depression, with higher scores indicating higher levels of depressive symptoms. The BDI is well established as being highly correlated with the HAMD at multiple time points.Reference Brown, Schulberg and Madonia28 Maternal mood was treated as a continuous measure, reflecting a dimensional range of depressive symptoms.
Child internalising and anxiety behaviour
At 3 years and 12 years, maternal reports of internalising and anxiety problems in their children were obtained using the Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) (for 1.5- to 5-year-oldsReference Achenbach29 and 6- to 18-year-oldsReference Achenbach and Rescorla30), a norm-referenced caregiver-completed rating scale that describes a child's functioning during the previous 6 months. All items are scored on a three-point Likert scale (0, not true; 1, somewhat or sometimes true; 2, very true or often true). All CBCL scales have a T-score mean of 50 and s.d. of 10 and different norms are provided for each gender across the age ranges of 6–11 years and 12–18 years. The CBCL yields a total problem score, externalising and internalising scores, and norm-referenced DSM-oriented scales, which include an anxiety problems scale. These DSM-oriented scales were created based on expert consensus of selected items from the CBCL and were developed to assist practitioners in the differential diagnostic process. The anxiety problems scale assesses symptoms of separation anxiety disorder, specific phobia and generalised anxiety disorder. There is substantial psychometric support for the various CBCL scales.Reference Achenbach and Rescorla30,Reference Berubé31 For the current study, we used the internalising and anxiety problems T-scores, which are computed based on the gender and age of the child.
When their children were 6 years of age, mothers completed the MacArthur Health and Behavior Questionnaire (HBQ), which yielded measures of internalising, externalising, over-anxious and inattention behaviours. These measures were derived from the Ontario Child Health Study Measure, which maps onto items from the CBCL and DSM-III-R symptom criteria for internalising behavioursReference Boyle, Offord, Racine, Fleming, Szatmari and Sanford32 in children ages 4 to 8 years.Reference Lemery-Chalfant, Schreiber, Schmidt, van Hulle, Essex and Goldsmith33 We also used the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders (SCARED),Reference Birmaher, Brent, Chiappetta, Bridge, Monga and Baugher34 a child and parent self-report instrument, to compare the mother's report of anxiety with that of their child, to examine whether mothers treated with a prenatal SSRI over-reported internalising and anxiety behaviours in their children.
Statistical analyses
Group differences in maternal and child characteristics and outcomes were determined using t-tests or χ2-tests as appropriate. To determine longitudinal associations between predictor variables, multilevel mixed model analyses were used to examine repeated measures (at 3, 6 and 12 years) and group differences in child behaviours as this method prevented listwise deletion owing to missing dataReference Gueorguieva and Krystal35 and enabled use of 160 mothers and their children from the original birth cohort (n = 191) where we had data from at least two time points. For these analyses, we used one continuous predictor variable (maternal mood at the third trimester), one categorical predictor variable (prenatal SSRI treatment: yes/no) and one interaction term (maternal mood at the third trimester × prenatal SSRI exposure). We chose maternal mood at the third trimester because this was the closest measurement during pregnancy relative to the other time points (at 3, 6 and 12 years). Standardised internalising and anxiety behaviour scores (z-scores) were derived from CBCL and HBQ internalising and anxiety behaviour measures at 3 and 12 years and at 6 years respectively. Two multilevel mixed models were used to assess whether the selected variables predicted internalising behaviour and to predict anxiety behaviour during the entire follow-up period.
To determine the relative contributions of each key exposure (prenatal depressed maternal mood, current maternal mood and SSRI exposure) on internalising behaviours at each age, three hierarchical regressions were conducted with internalising behaviour scores at 3, 6 and 12 years as the dependent variable. To determine the unique variance explained by each predictor (maternal mood at the third trimester, current maternal mood, SSRI exposure status) at each assessment (which is not possible using multilevel mixed model analyses), three hierarchical regressions were used separately, with internalising and anxiety measures at 3, 6, and 12 years as the dependent variables. Child age at the time of the study was entered at step 1, third trimester maternal HAMD scores were entered at step 2, current mood was entered at step 3 (e.g. for internalising measures at 3 years, HAMD scores at 3 years were entered; for internalising measures at 6 years, HAMD scores at 6 years were entered, etc.) and SSRI exposure status was entered at step 4.
There were missing maternal HAMD scores (e.g. third trimester: n = 4; 6 years: n = 22: 12 years: n = 23) and BDI scores (3 years: n = 8; 12 years: n = 90) as described above. Three mothers at the 12-year time point did not complete either the HAMD or the BDI. Missing values were imputed using an expectation maximisation algorithm to estimate missing data from key population parameter values (SYSTAT version 13 for Windows).
Order of entry of variables for the hierarchical regressions was based on previous cross-sectional research demonstrating that maternal mood was more associated with children's affective behaviour than was SSRI exposure.Reference Grzeskowiak, Morrison, Henriksen, Bech, Obel and Olsen15,Reference Nulman, Koren, Rovet, Barrera, Pulver and Streiner17,Reference Nulman, Koren, Rovet, Barrera, Streiner and Feldman18 All assumptions necessary for multiple regression analyses to be conducted and considered valid were met (e.g. absence of multicollinearity for the two maternal mood measures, as the variance inflation factor (VIF) was <10 and tolerance was >0.2) and no outliers or influential cases were detected. Maternal mood at the third trimester was included as a key covariate in the multilevel mixed models and hierarchical regressions. Current maternal mood was treated as a predictor for the hierarchical regressions only at each time point (3, 6 and 12 years). All analyses were conducted using SPSS version 19 for Windows.
Results
Maternal characteristics
Mothers with prenatal SSRI treatment had persistently higher levels of depressive symptoms during the second and third trimesters, and at 3 years, 6 years and 12 years, compared with mothers without prenatal SSRI treatment (Table 1). Characteristics of mothers with and without prenatal SSRI treatment did not significantly differ regarding ethnicity, prenatal smoking and prenatal alcohol use.
Mothers in both groups had a range of depressive symptoms at each assessment. Mothers with prenatal SSRI treatment reported significantly higher depressive symptoms than mothers without SSRI treatment. All group HAMD means (<11) were below the typical clinical cut-off for a diagnosis of moderate depression (17–23) and severe depression (≥24)Reference Zimmerman, Martinez, Young, Chelminski and Dalrymple36; however, we were interested in a range of depressive symptoms and we did not limit our study only to mothers who met diagnostic criteria for depression at each assessment.
To examine the possibility that mothers with prenatal SSRI treatment were over-reporting internalising and anxiety behaviours in their children, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to evaluate the agreement between maternal reports of anxiety and their children's self-reports using the SCARED.Reference Birmaher, Brent, Chiappetta, Bridge, Monga and Baugher34 The ICC provides an index of absolute agreement as it takes into account the ratio between participant variability and total variability.Reference McGraw and Wong37 ICCs were computed for the whole sample and by subsample (SSRI exposure versus no SSRI exposure) to investigate whether there were differences in mother–child agreement depending on SSRI exposure. ICCs are classified as follows: <0.40 indicates poor to fair agreement; 0.41–0.60 moderate agreement; 0.61–0.80 good agreement; and 0.81–1.00 excellent agreement.Reference Bartko38 At 12 years for the whole sample, the ICC between maternal report and their child's self-report for the SCARED total score was 0.62, P < 0.001 (n = 110). At 12 years among mothers who had been treated with an SSRI in pregnancy and their child's self-report for the SCARED total score, ICC = 0.76, P < 0.001 (n = 37). At 12 years among mothers without SSRI treatment and their child's self-report for the SCARED total score, ICC = 0.76, P < 0.001 (n = 73). In sum, these results suggest convergence of maternal and child self-reports of anxiety symptoms.
Child characteristics
At the 3- and 6-year assessment points, SSRI-exposed children were significantly older than children without SSRI exposure (Table 3). There were no significant differences between children with and without SSRI exposure in relation to the number of females in each group. There were also no gender differences in children's internalising and anxiety behaviours at 3, 6 and 12 years (data not shown, all P in the range 0.243–0.984).
Table 3 Descriptive statistics for key variables in children
SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor; CBCL, Child Behavior Checklist; HBQ, Health Behavior Questionnaire; SCARED, Screen for Child Anxiety Related Emotional Disorders.
a. Clarifications: Asian, those who self-identified as Oriental; White, those who self-identified as Caucasian; Other, those who self-identified as the following: Indian (n = 6), Latin (n = 5), Oriental/White (n = 3), Native North American Indian (n = 2), and one mother in each of the following self-identifying categories: Filipino/Polynesian, Black, Greek, Israeli, Eurasian, Jewish, West Indian, and preferred not to respond; SSRI treatment days, number of days of prenatal SSRI treatment (range: 41–294 days), no information was collected on timing of treatment but most mothers were taking SSRIs at the time of conception; prenatal smoking: Yes means <20 cigarettes per day; prenatal alcohol use, maternal alcohol consumption in single drinks during entire pregnancy; CBCL above threshold, number and percentage of participants with a T-score of 70 or higher on the CBCL; SCARED above threshold risk, number and percentage of participants with a total score of 25 or higher, which may indicate the presence of an anxiety disorder.
b. χ2 value.
c. Cohen (1988)Reference Altar, Hornberger, Shewade, Cruz, Garrison and Mrazek39 proposed guidelines of effect sizes for small, medium and large effects for both individual differences (Pearson's r = 0.10, 0.30 and 0.50, respectively) and group differences (Cohen's dor Hedges' g = 0.20, 0.50 and 0.80).
d. Phi value.
Children's internalising behaviours across childhood
Multilevel mixed model analyses (n = 160) investigated the impact of maternal mood at the third trimester, SSRI exposure and an interaction between maternal mood at the third trimester and SSRI exposure. Results showed that maternal mood at the third trimester was associated with increased internalising behaviours over time (Table 4). Neither SSRI exposure alone nor an interaction between SSRI exposure and third trimester maternal mood contributed significantly to the model.
Table 4 Estimated fixed effects of predictors for internalising and anxiety behaviours in children with and without prenatal exposure to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)a
a. The estimates indicate differences in average internalising and anxiety behaviours over time between groups (SSRI exposure, yes/no) and differences in maternal mood at the third trimester; n = 160, those with data from to or more time points.
Hierarchical regressions
To gauge the relative contributions of maternal mood at the third trimester, current maternal mood and SSRI exposure status to internalised behaviours at each point over time (which is not possible using multilevel mixed model analyses), three hierarchical regressions were conducted with internalising behaviour scores at 3, 6 and 12 years as the dependent variable. Results are detailed in Table 5. At 3 years, the age of the children was entered in step 1 and was not statistically significant. For step 2, maternal mood at the third trimester was statistically significant and accounted for an additional 8.8% of unique variance in internalising behaviours. For step 3, maternal mood at 3 years was statistically significant and accounted for an additional 4.6% of unique variance. For step 4, the prenatal SSRI exposure's contribution to the model was not statistically significant.
Table 5 Hierarchical regression analyses predicting internalising behaviours across childhood
SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
* P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
At 6 years, child age was entered in step 1 and was statistically significant. For step 2, maternal mood at the third trimester was statistically significant and accounted for an additional 12.6% of unique variance in internalising behaviours. For step 3, maternal mood at 6 years was not statistically significant. For step 4, SSRI exposure was not statistically significant.
At 12 years, child age was entered in step 1 and was not statistically significant. For step 2, maternal mood at the third trimester continued to have a statistically significant impact and accounted for an additional 17.9% of unique variance in internalising behaviours. For step 3, maternal mood at 12 years was not statistically significant. For step 4, SSRI exposure was not statistically significant.
Children's anxiety behaviours
Multilevel mixed model analyses (n = 160) investigated the impact of prenatal maternal mood, SSRI exposure and the interaction between prenatal maternal mood and SSRI exposure. Results showed that maternal mood during the third trimester was associated with increased child anxiety behaviour over time (Table 4). Neither SSRI exposure alone nor the interaction with prenatal maternal mood contributed significantly to the model.
Hierarchical regressions
To assess the relative contributions of maternal mood during the third trimester, current maternal mood and SSRI exposure status to anxiety behaviours at each point over time (which is not possible using multilevel mixed model analyses), three hierarchical regressions were conducted with anxiety behaviour scores at 3, 6 and 12 years as the dependent variable. Results are detailed in Table 6. At 3 years, the age of the children was entered in step 1 and was not statistically significant. For step 2, maternal mood at the third trimester was statistically significant and accounted for an additional 4.5% of unique variance. For step 3, maternal mood at 3 years was not statistically significant. For step 4, SSRI exposure was not statistically significant.
Table 6 Hierarchical regression analyses predicting anxiety behaviours across childhood
SSRI, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor.
* P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.
At 6 years, child age was entered in step 1 and was not statistically significant. For step 2, maternal mood during the third trimester was statistically significant and accounted for an additional 7.1% of unique variance. For step 3, maternal mood at 6 years was not statistically significant. For step 4, SSRI exposure was not statistically significant.
At 12 years, child age was entered in step 1 and was not statistically significant. For step 2, maternal mood at the third trimester was statistically significant and accounted for an additional 9.8% of unique variance. For step 3, maternal mood at 12 years was not statistically significant. For step 4, SSRI exposure was not statistically significant.
Discussion
In this study we examined longitudinal patterns of child internalising and anxious behaviours from 3 to 12 years of age and associations with maternal depressive symptoms and prenatal SSRI treatment. As expected, prenatal maternal depressive symptoms, not prenatal SSRI exposure, were associated with persistently higher levels of internalising and anxiety behaviours from toddlerhood into pre-adolescence. Additional analyses examined the relative contribution of prenatal maternal depressive symptoms, current maternal depressive symptoms and prenatal SSRI treatment. We showed that prenatal maternal depressive symptoms accounted for more variability in child internalising and anxiety behaviours than current depressive symptoms at each child assessment or prenatal SSRI exposure.
Interestingly, a greater proportion of the children of mothers with prenatal SSRI treatment had anxiety symptoms in the clinical range (29.7%) at 12 years of age, compared with children without prenatal SSRI exposure (10.9%), according to the child self-report SCARED and maternal report on the CBCL. Even with SSRI treatment, pregnant women in our study remained symptomatic (mean HAMD score of 11) during the third trimester, raising the possibility of an apparent ‘pharmacotherapeutic failure’ which put children of SSRI-treated mothers at an additional developmental risk. However, further exploration of the nature of pharmacotherapeutic failure and a discussion on whether there was a negative impact of ‘unneeded SSRI exposure’ is beyond the scope of this paper.
Our findings are consistent with previous cohort-based studies investigating relationships between internalising behaviours and prenatal SSRI exposureReference Misri, Reebye, Kendrick, Carter, Ryan and Grunau16–Reference Nulman, Koren, Rovet, Barrera, Streiner and Feldman18 and prenatal antidepressant exposureReference Grzeskowiak, Morrison, Henriksen, Bech, Obel and Olsen15,Reference Pedersen, Henriksen, Bech, Licht, Kjaer and Olsen20 in 3- to 6-year-olds. Our outcomes related to anxiety behaviours are also consistent with a larger population-based study of prenatal SSRI exposure and later diagnosis of anxiety with children up to 14 years of age.Reference Malm, Brown, Gissler, Gyllenberg, Hinkka-Yli-Salomäki and McKeague22 In contrast, Lupattelli et al.Reference Lupattelli, Wood, Ystrom, Skurtveit, Handal and Nordeng4 found that SSRI exposure in late pregnancy (after week 29) was associated with increased levels of anxiety behaviours in 5-year-olds when prenatal maternal depressive and anxiety symptoms were controlled for. These contradictory findings may reflect methodological differences due to varying extents of prenatal exposure in late pregnancy (after week 29) and controlling for maternal anxiety symptoms in addition to depressive symptoms. As the majority of prenatal SSRI exposure studies have examined internalising behaviours, very little attention has been paid to anxiety behaviours as a specific behavioural phenotype. To date despite the determined efforts to control for the confounding effects of maternal mental health (pre- and postnatal and current) and other factors that potentially contribute to residual confounding (e.g. genetic inheritance, environment), precise associations and underlying neurodevelopmental mechanisms that explain associations between prenatal SSRI exposure and behavioural outcomes remain to be determined.
Together, findings from this longitudinal birth cohort study indicate that children with prenatal SSRI exposure are not at greater risk for having higher levels of internalising and anxious behaviours across childhood and into early adolescence. However, maternal prenatal depressed mood as well as current maternal mood across childhood persistently accounted for most of the variance in child behavioural outcomes. It is worth noting that mean maternal HAMD scores for the current study (≤11) were not in the clinical range for scores for moderate depression (17−23),Reference Zimmerman, Martinez, Young, Chelminski and Dalrymple36 which is consistent with other studies in mothers with prenatal SSRI treatment.Reference Nulman, Koren, Rovet, Barrera, Pulver and Streiner17,Reference Nulman, Koren, Rovet, Barrera, Streiner and Feldman18 With this in mind we need to ask whether any observed developmental associations with prenatal SSRI exposure reflects a sustained effect related to in utero exposure to SSRIs or whether SSRI exposure merely represents a ‘proxy exposure’ that accompanies maternal mood disturbances reflecting the possible influence of genetic and environmental factors that may also contribute to child development. Importantly, our findings are consistent with a growing literature that increasingly shows that, regardless of SSRI exposure, maternal mood continues to influence behaviour across childhood,Reference Rommel, Bergink, Liu, Munk-Olsen and Molenaar5 highlighting that regardless of maternal prenatal SSRI treatment, development in children of depressed mothers treated with an SSRI during pregnancy remains disproportionality at risk. These findings have critical implications for ensuring timely and effective interventions for mothers during and following pregnancy as well as long-term follow-up for their children. In this study we observed that all measures of maternal depressive symptoms were associated with both internalising and anxiety behaviours at 12 years and point to the importance of ongoing assessments of maternal mental health long after delivery. Additional longitudinal studies are needed to determine risks related to perinatal maternal depressive symptoms and identify who can benefit from maternal pre- and postnatal antidepressant treatment.
Limitations
A few key limitations for this study are worth noting. First, the majority of mothers in our cohort were highly educated, and therefore these effects may not generalise across the full socioeconomic spectrum. Maternal education is only one component of socioeconomic status (SES) and other indicators (e.g. occupation, income, marital status) are needed to establish a broader perspective on the influence of SES. Second, as the measures of internalising and anxiety behaviours were completed by mothers, mothers who were depressed at the time may have been more likely to have a bias in over-reporting these behaviours. However, we examined this possibility using additional analyses comparing maternal reports of their child's anxiety and the children's self-reports using the SCARED and they were significantly associated, suggesting that maternal reports of anxiety were accurate. Third, as is typical in longitudinal research, some participants declined to participate over time, so our original sample of 191 participants had reduced to 118 at 12 years (62%). We therefore acknowledge an inherent selection bias (uncontrolled or even unmeasurable) that emerged over time and the small sample. Although we did conduct scenario-based quantitative bias analysis to partly address this concern, future research is still needed with larger samples to confirm these results.
Finally, although this was a longitudinal prospective study starting in the second trimester, yet unmeasured factors related to maternal illness severity, genetics and the everyday environment that could also have contributed to the impact of exposure to maternal mood and SSRI antidepressants need to be considered by future researchers. For example, some studies have found that genetic variations were associated with poor, rapid or ultrarapid metabolism, which could have an impact on the effectiveness of an SSRI dose.Reference Altar, Hornberger, Shewade, Cruz, Garrison and Mrazek39 Owing to our sample size, we had to limit the number of covariates used in the study; however, it is possible that studies in larger populations with sufficient statistical power might be able to address this limitation in future research.
In conclusion, this prospective longitudinal study found prenatal maternal depressive symptoms, not prenatal SSRI exposure per se, was associated with persistently increased levels of internalizing and anxiety behaviours from 3 to 12 years of age. These findings highlight that regardless of prenatal SSRI treatment, behavioural risk for affective disturbances associated with perinatal mood disturbances continued into early adolescence.
Supplementary material
Supplementary material is available online at https://doi.org/10.1192/bjo.2022.623.
Data availability
The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from T.F.O. (toberlander@cw.bc.ca). The data are not publicly available owing to privacy/ethical restrictions.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the mothers and their children who participated and contributed to this research programme.
Author contributions
S.M.H, T.F.O., L.C.M. and U.B. formulated the research questions. S.M.H, T.F.O., L.C.M. and U.B. designed the study. T.F.O. and U.B. carried out the study. S.M.H, B.K. and M.I. analysed the data. S.M.H, T.F.O., L.C.M., U.B. and R.E.G. wrote the article.
Funding
T.F.O. is the R. Howard Webster Professor in Brain Imaging and Early Child Development at the University of British Columbia and his work is supported by the BC Children's Hospital Research Institute (BCCHR) and the Canadian Institutes for Health Research (CIHR) (MOP 54490, 57837, 86296). L.C.M. receives support from BCCHR and CIHR. R.E.G. holds a salary award from the BCCHR. S.M.H. is supported by BCCHR and the Sunny Hill Foundation for Children.
Declaration of interest
None.
Open access
eLetters
No eLetters have been published for this article.