Are older patients denied access to psychological services due to ageism in the NHS?
- Release Date: 21/04/2009
- Country of Issue: United Kingdom
- Category: Cambridge Journals
New research conducted by Dr. Philip Wilkinson (Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Warneford Hospital Headington, Oxford) for a review published in the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist (Cambridge University Press on behalf of the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies) has found that there are serious gaps in the treatments available to older patients experiencing later life problems associated with old age including depression, anxiety disorders, panic disorder and sleep disorders.
Dr. Philip Wilkinson states that despite a robust evidence base in support of the use of Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) in the treatment of mental disorders in younger adults, “trials with older people have generally been of poor methodological quality. Therefore, the potential of CBT to improve the outcome of late-life mental illness has not yet been adequately tested and demonstrated”. There is, the author suggests, a strong case for retaining separate services for older people as their clinical needs may differ from younger adults.
Accessibility of services is another key issue that the article raises, although “CBT is one of the psychological therapies most frequently offered in the National Health Service, provision [to older patients] is patchy and relies on the availability of clinical psychologists”. Moreover, “older adults have been severely under-represented” in GP referrals, hinting not only at a staff shortage of skilled clinical psychologists in the NHS but, even more worryingly, indicating an ageist bias in favour of younger cases on the part of GPs and clinical practitioners alike. In a society that is rapidly getting older as a consequence of higher life expectancy brought about by medical advances and higher standards of living, this is indeed a major concern.
Dr. Wilkinson concludes that many of the randomized trials that served to give CBT the prominence it holds today apparently excluded older adults on the basis of age rather than more prognostic factors, such as the presence of dementia. “This reflects a failure to recognise that psychological treatments can indeed be relevant to older people and the problems they face. Data from trials that did include some older people indicate that age in itself does not affect outcome”. Despite recent increases in the range of CBT applications for older people, there appears to still be some prejudice in referring patients to these services and in inclusion of these patients in randomized clinical trials. Older people often have a preference for psychological treatments and presenting treatments as education rather than therapy can also increase their appeal.
According to Dr. Wilkinson, the lack of adequate CBT trials with older adults must be addressed, methodological limitations rectified, sample sizes increased to attain statistical validity, and the likelihood of bias minimized in order to tailor therapy to the particular problems of individuals, in this case older patient groups. For this reason, Dr. Wilkinson suggests developing standardized, reproducible CBT interventions and for these to be evaluated in large trials alongside medication or as part of case-management interventions.
Press coverage tends to highlight the problem of poor access to psychological treatments for older people; this review makes the case that development and evaluation of treatments are important too.
ENDS
Notes for Editors:
The article will be published on in the morning of Friday, 24 April 2009. For a prepublication preview of the article please contact Jamie Hutchins on +44(0)7903 593716, or email jhutchins@cambridge.org.
After Friday, 24 April 2009 to view the article in full, go to www.journals.cambridge.org/cbt where it will be available for free access until 21 May 2009.
About the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist
The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist is a new online only peer-reviewed journal that launched in 2008, and is aimed primarily at cognitive behavioural practitioners in the helping and teaching professions.
Published quarterly, the journal features papers covering clinical and professional issues, which contribute to the theory, practice and evolution of the cognitive and behavioural therapies. The journal publishes papers that describe new developments; articles that are practice focused and detail clinical interventions, research reports concerning the practice of cognitive behaviour therapy, detailed case reports, audits that are relevant to practice, and reviews of clinical scales. The journal also publishes papers that have an education, training or supervision focus. It includes reviews of recently published literature that is directly relevant to practitioners. A particular feature of the journal is that its electronic nature is designed to ensure timeliness of publication and professional debate whilst also ensuring rigorous standards in the dissemination of high quality materials with relevance to the practice of the cognitive and behaviour therapies.
Published for the British Association for Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapies, and edited by Mark Freeston from the University of Newcastle, United Kingdom and Michael Townend from the University of Derby, United Kingdom.
Philip Wilkinson’s article ‘Cognitive behavioural therapy with older adults: enthusiasm without the evidence?’ is published in the Cognitive Behaviour Therapist, 2009.
DOI: 10.1017/S1754470X09000191 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S1754470X09000191 eISSN: 1754-470X
For further information and to view the article in full, go to www.journals.cambridge.org/cbt
About Cambridge Journals
Cambridge Journals is part of Cambridge University Press and currently publishes over 240 peer-reviewed academic journals for the global market. Containing the latest research from a broad sweep of subject areas, Cambridge journals are accessible worldwide in print and online.
As well as journals owned by the Press itself, Cambridge Journals also publish on behalf of over 100 learned and professional societies.
Delivery of journal content via the internet has led to new markets opening up across the world. These include libraries operating together as consortia, and institutions in the developing world able to access journals for the first time. Cambridge is active in all these markets and works with many organisations to bring journals to research institutions across the globe.
For further information, go to www.journals.cambridge.org
If you would like more information, contact the Press Office:
- Telephone: +44 (0)1223 325544
- Fax: +44 (0)1223 325062
- Email: press@cambridge.org
- Post: The Press Office, University Printing House, Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, CB2 8BS, United Kingdom