Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Study of Politics and Africa
- 2 The Movement Legacy
- 3 The Problematic State
- 4 The Economy of Affection
- 5 Big Man Rule
- 6 The Policy Deficit
- 7 The Agrarian Question
- 8 Gender and Politics
- 9 Ethnicity and Conflict
- 10 The External Dimension
- 11 So What Do We Know?
- 12 Quo Vadis Africa?
- References
- Index
6 - The Policy Deficit
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 September 2012
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Acknowledgments
- 1 The Study of Politics and Africa
- 2 The Movement Legacy
- 3 The Problematic State
- 4 The Economy of Affection
- 5 Big Man Rule
- 6 The Policy Deficit
- 7 The Agrarian Question
- 8 Gender and Politics
- 9 Ethnicity and Conflict
- 10 The External Dimension
- 11 So What Do We Know?
- 12 Quo Vadis Africa?
- References
- Index
Summary
When Americans and Europeans think of policy, they usually associate it with a measure to solve a particular problem within the limits of what public resources permit. Making policy involves a careful calculation of how means relate to desired ends. It is about such principles as feasibility, sustainability, and efficiency – all in one. Policy analysis, as conventional textbooks confirm, is the application of economic principles to the political process. But, as the African experience suggests, policy making does not have to be based on an economic rationale. As the previous five chapters have shown, where politics is supreme and power not effectively reined in, policy making is more typically made on purely political grounds. Policy objectives become ends in themselves as the calculation of costs to achieve them are ignored.
There are three factors in the international environment that help explain why policy making in Africa has tended to be void of economic thinking. One is that African countries originally saw themselves as being caught in the process of catching up with the developed societies. In such circumstances, thinking economically meant going slower than was deemed desirable. The second reason is that African governments have often viewed the rest of the world, and especially the former colonial powers, as having a moral responsibility to pay for African development because of all the suffering that colonialism caused.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- African Politics in Comparative Perspective , pp. 116 - 137Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2005