Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword, by Eric E. Bergsten
- Contributors
- PART ONE INTRODUCTION
- PART TWO CISG–UNIDROIT Principles comparative editorials
- PART THREE CISG–PECL COMPARATIVE EDITORIALS
- Art. 6 CISG–PECL, by Ulrich G. Schroeter [Germany]
- Art. 7 CISG–PECL, by John Felemegas [Australia]
- Art. 8 CISG–PECL, by Maja Stanivukovic [Serbia]
- Art. 9 CISG–PECL, by Anja Carlsen [Denmark]
- Art. 10 CISG–PECL, by Allison E. Butler [U.S.A.]
- Art. 11 CISG–PECL, by Allison E. Butler [U.S.A.]
- Art. 13 CISG–PECL, by Ulrich G. Schroeter [Germany]
- Art. 14 CISG–PECL, by Predrag N. Cvetkovic [Serbia]
- Art. 16 CISG–PECL, by Orkun Akseli [Turkey]
- Art. 17 CISG–PECL, by Cecilia Carrara [Italy] & Joachim A. Kuckenburg [Germany]
- Art. 18 CISG–PECL, by Cecilia Carrara [Italy] & Joachim A. Kuckenburg [Germany]
- Art. 19 CISG–PECL, by Pilar Perales Viscasillas [Spain]
- Art. 20 CISG–PECL, by John Felemegas [Australia]
- Art. 21 CISG–PECL, by John Felemegas [Australia]
- Art. 23 CISG–PECL, by Pilar Perales Viscasillas [Spain]
- Art. 25 CISG–PECL, by Hossam El-Saghir [Egypt]
- Art. 28/62 CISG–PECL, by Jarno J. Vanto [Finland]
- Art. 29 CISG–PECL, by Sieg Eiselen [South Africa]
- Art. 31/57 CISG–PECL, by Chengwei Liu [China]
- Art. 33/52(1) CISG–PECL, by Colin Ying [Australia]
- Arts. 45/61 CISG–PECL, by Chengwei Liu [China]
- Art. 46 CISG–PECL, by Jarno J. Vanto [Finland]
- Arts. 47/49(1)(b) CISG–PECL, by Bruno Zeller [Australia]
- Art. 48 CISG–PECL, by Jonathan Yovel [Israel]
- Art. 49 CISG–PECL, by Jonathan Yovel [Israel]
- Art. 50 CISG–PECL, by Jarno J. Vanto [Finland]
- Arts. 51/73 CISG–PECL, by Christopher Kee [Australia]
- Art. 55 CISG–PECL, by Andrea Vincze [Hungary]
- Art. 58 CISG–PECL, by John Felemegas [Australia]
- Arts. 63/64(1)(b) CISG–PECL, by Bruno Zeller [Australia]
- Art. 64 CISG–PECL, by Jonathan Yovel [Israel]
- Art. 65 CISG–PECL, by Andrea L. Charters [U.S.A.]
- Arts. 71/72 CISG–PECL, by Sieg Eiselen [South Africa]
- Art. 74 CISG–PECL, by Philipp Höttler [Germany] & Friedrich Blasé [Germany]
- Art. 75 CISG–PECL, by Bojidara Borisova [Bulgaria]
- Art. 76 CISG–PECL, by Jonathan Yovel [Israel]
- Art. 77 CISG–PECL, by Bruno Zeller [Australia]
- Arts. 78/84(1) CISG–PECL, by Francesco G. Mazzotta [Italy]
- Art. 79 CISG–PECL, by Dionysios P. Flambouras [Greece]
- Art. 80 CISG–PECL, by Allison E. Butler [U.S.A.]
- Art. 81 CISG–PECL, by Francesco G. Mazzotta [Italy]
- Art. 82 CISG–PECL, by Francesco G. Mazzotta [Italy]
- Arts. 85, 86, 87, 88 CISG–PECL, by Francesco G. Mazzotta [Italy]
- Index
Art. 21 CISG–PECL, by John Felemegas [Australia]
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 October 2009
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- Foreword, by Eric E. Bergsten
- Contributors
- PART ONE INTRODUCTION
- PART TWO CISG–UNIDROIT Principles comparative editorials
- PART THREE CISG–PECL COMPARATIVE EDITORIALS
- Art. 6 CISG–PECL, by Ulrich G. Schroeter [Germany]
- Art. 7 CISG–PECL, by John Felemegas [Australia]
- Art. 8 CISG–PECL, by Maja Stanivukovic [Serbia]
- Art. 9 CISG–PECL, by Anja Carlsen [Denmark]
- Art. 10 CISG–PECL, by Allison E. Butler [U.S.A.]
- Art. 11 CISG–PECL, by Allison E. Butler [U.S.A.]
- Art. 13 CISG–PECL, by Ulrich G. Schroeter [Germany]
- Art. 14 CISG–PECL, by Predrag N. Cvetkovic [Serbia]
- Art. 16 CISG–PECL, by Orkun Akseli [Turkey]
- Art. 17 CISG–PECL, by Cecilia Carrara [Italy] & Joachim A. Kuckenburg [Germany]
- Art. 18 CISG–PECL, by Cecilia Carrara [Italy] & Joachim A. Kuckenburg [Germany]
- Art. 19 CISG–PECL, by Pilar Perales Viscasillas [Spain]
- Art. 20 CISG–PECL, by John Felemegas [Australia]
- Art. 21 CISG–PECL, by John Felemegas [Australia]
- Art. 23 CISG–PECL, by Pilar Perales Viscasillas [Spain]
- Art. 25 CISG–PECL, by Hossam El-Saghir [Egypt]
- Art. 28/62 CISG–PECL, by Jarno J. Vanto [Finland]
- Art. 29 CISG–PECL, by Sieg Eiselen [South Africa]
- Art. 31/57 CISG–PECL, by Chengwei Liu [China]
- Art. 33/52(1) CISG–PECL, by Colin Ying [Australia]
- Arts. 45/61 CISG–PECL, by Chengwei Liu [China]
- Art. 46 CISG–PECL, by Jarno J. Vanto [Finland]
- Arts. 47/49(1)(b) CISG–PECL, by Bruno Zeller [Australia]
- Art. 48 CISG–PECL, by Jonathan Yovel [Israel]
- Art. 49 CISG–PECL, by Jonathan Yovel [Israel]
- Art. 50 CISG–PECL, by Jarno J. Vanto [Finland]
- Arts. 51/73 CISG–PECL, by Christopher Kee [Australia]
- Art. 55 CISG–PECL, by Andrea Vincze [Hungary]
- Art. 58 CISG–PECL, by John Felemegas [Australia]
- Arts. 63/64(1)(b) CISG–PECL, by Bruno Zeller [Australia]
- Art. 64 CISG–PECL, by Jonathan Yovel [Israel]
- Art. 65 CISG–PECL, by Andrea L. Charters [U.S.A.]
- Arts. 71/72 CISG–PECL, by Sieg Eiselen [South Africa]
- Art. 74 CISG–PECL, by Philipp Höttler [Germany] & Friedrich Blasé [Germany]
- Art. 75 CISG–PECL, by Bojidara Borisova [Bulgaria]
- Art. 76 CISG–PECL, by Jonathan Yovel [Israel]
- Art. 77 CISG–PECL, by Bruno Zeller [Australia]
- Arts. 78/84(1) CISG–PECL, by Francesco G. Mazzotta [Italy]
- Art. 79 CISG–PECL, by Dionysios P. Flambouras [Greece]
- Art. 80 CISG–PECL, by Allison E. Butler [U.S.A.]
- Art. 81 CISG–PECL, by Francesco G. Mazzotta [Italy]
- Art. 82 CISG–PECL, by Francesco G. Mazzotta [Italy]
- Arts. 85, 86, 87, 88 CISG–PECL, by Francesco G. Mazzotta [Italy]
- Index
Summary
INTRODUCTION
In Part II of the Convention, entitled “Formation of the Contract,” Article 21 deals with the issue of late acceptance by an offeree, the response to that by the offeror, and the effect that a late acceptance has in the context of contract formation.
Article 2:207, found in the PECL, Chapter 2 “Formation,” Section 2 “Offer and Acceptance,” regulates the same issues concerning late acceptance in contract formation.
The Convention provides that a late acceptance can nonetheless be effective, and so do the Principles. Both the Convention and the Principles deal with the issue of late acceptance – whether the offeree accepted the offer late or the acceptance was late because of a delay in transmission – in almost identical terms.
LATE ACCEPTANCE OF OFFER TO CONCLUDE CONTRACT
Art. 21 of the Convention “deals with acceptances that arrive after the expiration of the time for acceptance.” In that sense, Art. 21 must be viewed in the context of the basic rule of the Convention that a late acceptance is ineffective.
Honnold states that CISG Art. 21 “like Article 20, extends and elaborates the basic rule” for late acceptances, by providing the answer to some related, important questions that can arise when an acceptance does not reach the offeror within the time he has fixed for acceptance.
CISG Art. 21 makes a distinction in the rules applicable to a late acceptance, depending on whether the acceptance was sent late by the offeree or the lateness of the acceptance was caused by delays in its transmission.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2007