Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Summary Contents
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- List of Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I European Law: Creation
- 1 Union institutions
- 2 Union legislation
- 3 Union competences
- 4 Fundamental rights
- Part II European Law: Enforcement
- Part III European Law: Substance
- Index
- References
3 - Union competences
from Part I - European Law: Creation
- Frontmatter
- Summary Contents
- Contents
- List of Illustrations
- List of Tables
- Acknowledgements
- Table of Cases
- Abbreviations
- Introduction
- Part I European Law: Creation
- 1 Union institutions
- 2 Union legislation
- 3 Union competences
- 4 Fundamental rights
- Part II European Law: Enforcement
- Part III European Law: Substance
- Index
- References
Summary
Introduction
When the British Parliament legislates, it need not “justify” its acts. It is traditionally considered to enjoy a competence to do all things. This “omnipotence” was inherent in the idea of a sovereign parliament in a “sovereign state”. The European Union is neither “sovereign” nor a “state”. Its powers are not inherent powers. They must be conferred by its foundational charter: the European Treaties. This constitutional principle is called the “principle of conferral”. The Treaty on European Union defines it as follows:
Under the principle of conferral, the Union shall act only within the limits of the competences conferred upon it by the Member States in the Treaties to attain the objectives set out therein. Competences not conferred upon the Union in the Treaties remain with the Member States.
The Treaties employ the notion of competence in various provisions. Nevertheless, there is no positive definition of the concept. So what is a legislative competence? The best definition is this: a legislative competence is the material field within which an authority is entitled to legislate. What are these material fields in which the Union is entitled to legislate? The Treaties do not enumerate the Union’s “competences” in a single list. Instead, the Treaties pursue a different technique: they attribute legal competence for each and every Union activity in the respective Treaty title. Each policy area contains a provision – sometimes more than one – on which Union legislation can be based. The various “Union policies and internal actions” of the Union are set out in Part III of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
The Treaties thus present a picture of thematically limited competences in distinct policy areas. This picture is however – partly – misleading. Three legal developments have posed serious threats to the principle of conferral. First, the rise of teleological interpretation (see Section 1 below). The Union’s competences are interpreted in such a way that they potentially “spill over” into other policy areas. This “spillover” effect can be particularly observed with regard to a second development: the rise of the Union’s general competences.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- An Introduction to European Law , pp. 59 - 82Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2012