Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-pfhbr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T06:26:29.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - General Inhalation Anesthesia for Cosmetic Surgery

from PART II - ALTERNATIVE ANESTHESIA APPROACHES IN COSMETIC SURGERY

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 August 2009

Meena Desai M.D.
Affiliation:
Managing Partner Nova Anesthesia Professsionals, Villanova, PA
Barry Friedberg
Affiliation:
Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

The ultimate in consumer-driven medical care is the business of cosmetic surgery. These are purely elective procedures performed for the convenience and wishes of the buyer patient and at the convenience of the patient. Traditional ideology of surgical care is maximized as service is optimized. The maximization of service should never, however, compromise the prevailing medical, surgical, or anesthetic standard of care. Meeting the standard of care is the minimum requirement of the cosmetic surgical practice.

Much has been written regarding the safety of general anesthesia in the office. One should have a structure and plan for the administration of care that adheres to known standards. The care offered to entice the consumer to an individual practice and practitioner is multifaceted. Several studies have found that the friendliness and courtesy of the staff were top predictors of patient satisfaction. The rendering of anesthetic care must be cognizant of the consumerism of plastic surgery and be sensitive of delivering their care with a practice philosophy suited to the surgical practice. Care is often beyond expectations as patients and their idiosyncratic requests are willingly accommodated.

In this chapter, some of the specific particulars of general anesthetic care are provided as they relate to individual procedures. There are also some methods of care that cater to the consumerism milieu.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Hoefflin, SM, Bornstein, JB, Gordon, M: General anesthesia in office-based plastic surgical facility: A report on more than 23,000 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:243, 2001.Google Scholar
Byrd, HS, Barton, FE, Orenstein, HH, et al.: Safety and efficacy in an accredited outpatient plastic surgery facility. Plast Reconstr Surg 112:636, 2003.Google Scholar
Iverson, RE: ASPS task force on patient safety in office-based surgery facilities. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1337, 2002.Google Scholar
Iverson, RE, Lynch, DJ: ASPS task force: Patient safety in office-based surgery facilities. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:1785, 2002.Google Scholar
Deutshn, , Wu, CL: Patient outcomes following ambulatory anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin N Amer 21:403, 2003.Google Scholar
ASA Guidelines.
Chung, F, Merzei, G, Tong, D: Pre-existing medical conditions as predictors of adverse events. Brit J Anaesth 83:262, 1999.Google Scholar
Natof, HE: Pre-existing medical problems: Ambulatory surgery. Illinois Med J 166:101, 1984.Google Scholar
Langeron, O, Massou, E, Huraux, C, et al.: Prediction of difficult mask ventilation. Anesthesiol 92:1229, 2000.Google Scholar
deJong, RH: Body mass index: Risk predictor for cosmetic day surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg 108:556, 2001.Google Scholar
Loadsman, JA, Hilman, DR: Anesthesia and sleep apnea. Br J Anesth 86:254, 2001.Google Scholar
Eagle, KA, Berger, PB, Calkins, H, et al.: ACC/AHA guideline update for preoperative cardiovascular evaluation: Executive summary report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Froce on Practical Guidelines. Circulation 105:1257, 2002.Google Scholar
Chassot, PG, Delabays, A, Spahn, DR: Preoperative evaluation of patients with, or at risk of, coronary artery disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth 89:747, 2002.Google Scholar
Boldt, J, Jaun, N: Economic consideration of the use of new anesthetics: A comparison of propofol, sevoflurane. Anesth Analg 86:504, 1998.Google Scholar
Montes, FR, Trillos, JE, Rincon, IE, et al.: Comparison of total intravenous anesthesia and sevoflurane-fentanyl anesthesia for outpatient otorhinolaryngeal surgery. J Clin Anesth 14: 324, 2002.Google Scholar
Larsen, B, Seitz, A, Larsen, R: Recovery of cognitive function after remifentanil-propofol anesthesia. Anesth Analg 90:168, 2000.Google Scholar
Lebenborm-Mansour, MH, Pandit, SK, Kothary, SP, et al.: Desflurane vs. propofol anesthesia: A comparative analysis. Anesth Analg 76:936, 1993.Google Scholar
Joshi, GP: Inhalational techniques in ambulatory anesthesia. Anesthesiol Clin N Am 21:263, 2003.Google Scholar
Gan, TJ, Glass, PS, Windsor, A, et al.: Bispectral index monitoring allows faster emergence and improved recovery. BIS utility study group. Anesthesiol 87:808, 1997.Google Scholar
Song, D, Joshi, G, White, PF: Titration of volatile anesthetics using Bispectral index. Anesthesiol 87:842, 1997.Google Scholar
Kalkman, CH, Drummond, JC: Monitors of depth of anesthesia (editorial). Anesthesiol 96:784, 2002.Google Scholar
Drover, DR, Lemmens, HJ, Pierce, ET, et al.: Patient state index: Titration of delivery and recovery from propofol. Anesthesiol 97:82, 2002.Google Scholar
Song, D: Titration of volatile anesthetics using bispectral index facilitates recovery. Anesthesiol 87:842, 1997.Google Scholar
Pavlin, DJ, Hong, JY, Friund, PR, et al.: The effect of bispectral index monitoring on endtidal gas concentration. Anesth Analg 93:613, 2001.Google Scholar
Yli-HankalaA, A,Vakkuri, A, Annila, P, et al.: EEG bispectral index monitoring in sevoflurane or propofol. Acta Anesthesiol Scand 43:545, 1999.Google Scholar
O'Connor, MF, Daves, SM, Tung, A, et al.: BIS monitoring to prevent awareness during general anesthesia. Anesthesiol 94:520, 2001.Google Scholar
Mak S, Crowley J: The utility of the Bispectral Index vs. standard practice anesthetic care: A meta analysis of randomized trials comparing drug reduction and recovery time. Poster presentation at the 2002 annual meeting ofSAMBA.
Rosow, C, Manberg, PJ: Bispectral Index monitoring: Monitoring during critical events. Anesthesiol Clin N Am 19:947, 2001.Google Scholar
Myles, PS, Leslie, K: Bispectral index monitoring to prevent awareness during anaesthesia: The B-Aware randomised controlled Trial. The Lancet 363:1757, 2004.Google Scholar
Ekman, A, Lindholm, ML, Lennmarken, C, et al.: Reduction in the incidence of awareness using BIS monitoring. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 48:20, 2004.Google Scholar
Tang, J, Chen, L, White, PF, et al.: Use of propofol for office-based anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 11:226, 1999.Google Scholar
Song, D, Whitten, C, White, P: Use of remifentanil during anesthetic induction. Anesth Analg 88:734, 1999.Google Scholar
Joshi, GP, Warner, DS, Twersky, RS, et al.: A comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl adverse effect profile. J Clin Anesth 14:494, 2002.Google Scholar
Apfelbaum, JL, Walawander, CA, Grascla, TH, et al.: Eliminating intensive postoperative care in same day surgery patients using short acting anesthetics. Anesthesiol 97:66, 2002.Google Scholar
Grazer, FM, Jong, RH: Fatal outcomes from liposuction: Census survey of cosmetic surgeons. Plast Reconstr Surg 105:436, 2000.Google Scholar
Kenkel, JM, Lipschitz, AH, Luby, M, et al.: Hemodynamic physiology and thermoregulation in liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 114:503, 2004.Google Scholar
Jong, RH, Grazer, FM: Perioperative management of cosmetic liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:1039, 2001.Google Scholar
Trott, SA, Beran, SJ, Rohrich, RJ, et al.: Safety consideration and fluid resuscitation in liposuction: An analysis of 53 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 102:2220, 1998.Google Scholar
Steele, SM, Nielsen, KC, Klein, SM (eds.): Ambulatory Anesthesia Perioperative Analgesia. New York, McGraw Hill, 2005.
Casac, L, Jewell, M: Non-narcotic acute pain relief after aesthetic surgery. Aesth Surg J 22:493, 2002.Google Scholar
Friedberg, BL: Facial laser resurfacing with propofol-ketamine technique: Room air, spontaneous ventilation (RASV) anesthesia. Dermatol Surg 25:569, 1999.Google Scholar
Blakely, KR, Klein, KW, White, PF, et al.: A total intravenous technique for outpatient facial laser resurfacing. Anesth Analg 87:827, 1998.Google Scholar
Chung, F, Mezei, G: Factors contributing to a prolonged stay after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 89:1352, 1999.Google Scholar
Joshi, GP: Fast tracking in outpatient surgery. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 14:635, 2001.Google Scholar
Marshall, SI, Chung, F: Discharge criteria and complication after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 88:508, 1999.Google Scholar
Joshi, GP, Twersky, R: Fast tracking in ambulatory surgery. Ambul Surg 8:185, 2000.Google Scholar
Joshi, GP: New concepts in recovery after ambulatory surgery. Ambul Surg 10:167, 2003.Google Scholar
McHugh, GA, Thoms, GM: The management of pain following day case surgery. Anaesthesia 57:270, 2002.Google Scholar
Pavlin, DJ, Chen, C, Penaloza, DA: Pain as a complicating recovery and discharge after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg 95:627, 2002.Google Scholar
Marcus, JR, Few, JW, Chao, JD, et al.: Prevention of emesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 109:2487, 2002.Google Scholar
Gan, TJ, Meyer, T, Apfel, CC, et al.: Consensus guidelines for managing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 97:62, 2003.Google Scholar
Gupta, AM, Wu, CL, Elkassabany N, et al.: Does the routing prophylactic use of antiemetics affect the incidence of postdischarge nausea?Anesthesiol 99:488, 2003.Google Scholar
Gan, TJ, Sloan, F, de L Dear, G, et al.: How much are patients willing to pay to avoid postoperative vomiting?Anesth Analg 92:393, 2001.Google Scholar
Apfel, CC: A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea. Anesthesiol 91:693, 1999.Google Scholar
Cohen, MM, Duncan, PG, Debor, DP, et al.: The postoperative interview: Assessing risk factors for nausea and vomiting. Analg 78:7, 1994.Google Scholar
Cepeda, MS, Gonzalez, F, Granados, V, et al.: Incidence of nausea and vomiting in outpatients undergoing general anesthesia. J Clin Anesth 8:324, 1996.Google Scholar
Geldner, G, Wulf, H: Muscle relaxants suitable for day case surgery. Eur J Anesthesiol 18(S23):43, 2001.Google Scholar
Tramer, MR, Fuchs-Buder, T: Omitting antagonism of neuromuscular block: Effect on postop nausea. Br J of Anaesth 82:379, 1999.Google Scholar
Habib, AS, Gan, TJ: Combination antiemetics: What is the evidence?Int Anesthesiol Clin 41:119, 2003.Google Scholar
White, PF, Hamza, MA, Recart, A, et al.: Optimal timing of acustimulation for emetic prohylaxis as an adjunct to ondansetron in patients undergoing plastic surgery. Anesth Analg 100:367, 2005.Google Scholar
Tang, J, Wang, B, White, P, et al.: The effect of timing of ondasetron administration on its efficacy, cost-effectiveness. Anesth Analg 86:274, 1998.Google Scholar
Barbosa, MV, Nahas, FX, Ferreira, LM: Ondansetron for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting: Which is the best dosage for aesthetic surgery patients?Aesth Plast Surg 28:33, 2004.Google Scholar
Wang, JJ, Ho, ST, Tzen, JI, et al.: The effect of timing of dexamethasone administration on it efficacy. Anesth Analg 91:136, 2000.Google Scholar
Henzi, I, Walder, B, Tramer, M: Dexamethasone for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Anesth Analg 90:186, 2000.Google Scholar
Fuji, Y, Tanaka, H, Toyooka, H: The effects of dexamethasone on posantiemetics in female patients. Anesth Analg 85:913, 1997.Google Scholar
Jin, FL, Norris, A: Should adult patients drink fluids before discharge from ambulatory surgery?Can J Anesth 87:306, 1998.Google Scholar
MHAUS: www.mhaus.org.
Most, D, Koslow, J, Heller, J: Thromboembolisn in plastic surgery. Plast Reconst Surg 115:20, 2005.Google Scholar
Jewell, M: Prevention of DVT in aesthetic surgery. Aesth Surg J 2:161, 2001.Google Scholar
Reinisch, JF, Bresnick, SD, Walker, JW, et al.: Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolus after facelift. Plast Reconstr Surg 107:157, 2001.Google Scholar
McDevitt, NB: American Society of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons – DVT prophylaxis. Plast Reconstr Surg 104:1923, 1999.Google Scholar
Lofsky, AS: Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism in plastic surgery office procedures. The Doctors' Company Newsletter. Napa, CA, 2005 ww.thedoctors.com/risk/specialty/anesthesiology/J4254.asp
Friedberg, BL: Propofol-ketamine technique, dissociative anesthesia for office surgery: A five year review of 1,264 cases. Aesth Plast Surg 23:70, 1999.Google Scholar
Laurito CE: Anesthesia provided at alternative sites, in Barasch, PG, Cullen, BF, Stoelting, RK (eds.), Clinical Anesthesia, 4th ed., Philadelphia, Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins, 2001; p1343.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×