Abraham, M. H., Hassanisadi, M., Jalali-Heravi, M., Ghafourian, T., Cain, W. S. and Cometto-Muniz, J. E. 2003. Draize rabbit eye test compatibility with eye irritation thresholds in humans: a quantitative structure–activity relationship analysis. Toxicological Sciences 76: 384–91.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Adams, R. 1977. The Plague Dogs. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar

,American Medical Association Council on Scientific Affairs 1989. Council report on animals in research. Journal of the American Medical Association 261: 3602–6.

,American Society of Ichthyologists and Herpetologists 2004. Guidelines for Use of Live Amphibians and Reptiles in Field Research, second edition. http://www.asih.org/files/hacc-final.pdf. Retrieved 14 January 2008.

,Animal Welfare Committee 2007. National Health and Medical Research Council Guidelines for the Generation, Breeding, Care, and Use of Genetically Modified and Cloned Animals for Scientific Purposes. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

,Animal Welfare Information Center and Universities Federation for Animal Welfare 1995. Environmental Enrichment Information Resources for Laboratory Animals: 1965–1995 Birds, Cats, Dogs, Farm Animals, Ferrets, Rabbits and Rodents. London: UFAW.

,Anon. 1992. Scientific procedures on living animals, cited in Porter, D. G. Ethical scores for animal experiments. Nature 356: 101–2.

,Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour 2006. Guidelines for the treatment of animals in behavioural research and teaching. Animal Behaviour 71: 245–53.

,Australian and New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching 1993a. Scientific procedures on living animals in Great Britain in 1991. ANZCCART News 6(1): 12.

,Australian and New Zealand Council for the Care of Animals in Research and Teaching 1993b. Legal protection for the octopus. ANZCCART News 6(4): 7.

,Australian Government, Senate Select Committee on Animal Welfare 1989. Animal Experimentation. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

Bacon, F. 1605/2001. The Advancement of Learning, Gould, S. J. (ed.). New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Bailey, K. R., Rustay, N. R. and Crawley, J. N. 2006. Behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout mice: practical concerns and potential pitfalls. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Journal 47: 124–31.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Balls, M. 1983. Alternatives to animal experimentation. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 11: 56–62.Google Scholar

Balls, M. 1990. Recent progress toward reducing the use of animal experimentation in biomedical research. In Garattini, S. and Bekkum, D. W. (eds.), The Importance of Animal Experimentation for Safety and Biomedical Research, pp. 223–35. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Battye, J. 1994. Ethics and animal welfare – where do we go from here? In Baker, R. M., Mellor, D. J. and Nicol, A. M. (eds.), Animal Welfare in the Twenty-First Century: Ethical, Educational and Scientific Challenges, pp. 3–10. Adelaide: ANZCCART.Google Scholar

Baumans, V., Coke, C., Green, J., Moreau, E., Morton, D., Patterson-Kane, E., Reinhardt, A., Reinhardt, V. and Loo, P. (eds.) 2007. Making Lives Easier for Animals in Research Labs. Washington DC: Animal Welfare Institute. http://www.awionline.org/pubs/LAREF/LAREF-bk.html. Retrieved 14 January 2008.

Bayne, K. A. and Martin, D. P. 1998. AAALAC International: using performance standards to evaluate an animal care and use program. Lab Animal 27(4): 32–5.Google Scholar

Benassi, L., Bertazzoni, G. and Seidenari, S. 1999. In vitro testing of tensides employing monolayer cultures: a comparison with results of patch tests on human volunteers. Contact Dermatitis 40: 38–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Benison, S. 1970. In defense of medical research. Harvard Medical Bulletin 44: 16–23.Google Scholar

Bentham, J. 1789/1970. An introduction to the principles of morals and legislation. In Burns, J. H. and Hart, H. L. A. (eds.), The Collected Works of Jeremy Bentham, Vol. 2.1. London: Athlone.Google Scholar

Bernard, C. 1865/1957. An Introduction to the Study of Experimental Medicine, trans. Greene, H. C.New York: Dover.Google Scholar

Bilbo, S. D. and Nelson, R. J. 2001. Behavioral phenotyping of transgenic and knockout animals: a cautionary tale. Lab Animals 30: 24–9.Google ScholarPubMed

,Biosecurity New Zealand 2006. Guide to the Preparation of Codes of Ethical Conduct. http://www.biosecurity.govt.nz/animal-welfare/naeac/papers/naeaccec.htm. Retrieved 12 January 2008.

Birch, C. 1993. Regaining Compassion for Humanity and Nature, pp. 86–96. Kensington: New South Wales University Press.Google Scholar

Bliss, M. 1982. The Discovery of Insulin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google ScholarPubMed

,Boyd Group Discussion Paper 1999. Genetic Engineering: Animal Welfare and Ethics. http://www.boyd-group.demon.co.uk/genmod.htm. Retrieved 12 January 2008.

Boyle, P. R. 1991. The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Cephalopods in the Laboratory. London: UFAW.Google Scholar

Brabazon, J. 1976. Albert Schweitzer: A Biography. London: Victor Gollancz.Google Scholar

Britt, D. 1984. Ethics, ethical committees and animal experimentation. Nature 311: 503–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bronowski, J. 1956. Science and Human Values, revised edition 1965. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Brown, M. J. and Murray, K. A. 2006. Phenotyping of genetically engineered mice: humane ethical environmental and husbandry issues. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Journal 47: 118–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Bruce, D. and Bruce, A. 2003. Genetic engineering and animal welfare. In Armstrong, S. J. and Botzler, R. G. (eds.), The Animal Ethics Reader, pp. 313–22. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Buehr, M., Hjorth, J. P. and Hansen, A. K. 2003. Genetically modified laboratory animals – what welfare problems do they face?Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science 6: 319–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Burkhardt, J. 2003. The inevitability of animal biotechnology? Ethics and the scientific attitude. In Armstrong, S. J. and Botzler, R. G. (eds.), The Animal Ethics Reader, pp. 332–41. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Callicott, J. B. 1989. In Defense of the Land Ethic: Essays in Environmental Philosophy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.

Caplan, A. 1989. Cited in Animal Experimentation, Australian Government, Senate Select Committee on Animal Welfare. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar

Clark, S. R. L. 1984. The Moral Status of Animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Clark, S. R. L. 1997. Animals and Their Moral Standing. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

,Commonwealth of Australia 2005. National Animal Welfare Bill (2005). http://parlinfoweb.aph.gov.au/parlinfo/Repository/Legis/Bills/Linked/20060507.pdf. Retrieved 12 January 2008.

Cordelli, E., Fresegna, A. M., D'Alessio, A., Spano, M., Villani, P. and Pacchierotti, F. 2007. A new in vitro method to assess DNA damage in sperm as an alternative to animal testing in reproductive toxicology. Toxicology Letters 172, Supplement 1: S76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cottingham, J. 1978. A brute to the brutes?: Descartes' treatment of animals. Philosophy 53: 551–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cranefield, P. F. 1974. The Way In and the Way Out: François Magendie, Charles Bell, and the Roots of the Spinal Nerves. New York: Futura.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 1859/1999. On the Origin of Species by Natural Selection. New York: Bantam Classics.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 1871/2004. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar

Darwin, C. 1881/1985. The Formation of Vegetable Mould, through the Action of Worms. Facsimile of the first edition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Denton, D. 1993. The Pinnacle of Life: Consciousness and Self-Awareness in Humans and Animals. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar

Descartes, R. 1637/1984. Discours de la Méthode, trans. Curtis, D.London: Grant and Cutler.Google Scholar

Di Marco, P. N., Howell, J. McC. and Dorling, P. R. 1984. Bovine glycogenosis type II. Biochemical and morphological characteristics of skeletal muscle in culture. Neuropathology and Applied Neurobiology 10: 379–95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Draize, J. H., Woodward, G. and Calvery, H. O. 1944. Methods for the study of irritation and toxicity of substances applied to the skin and mucous membranes. Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapy 82: 377.Google Scholar

Duckworth, W. L. H., Lyons, M. C. and Towers, B. (eds.) 1962. Galen, On Anatomical Procedures: The Later Books. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Eisemann, C. H., Jorgensen, W. K., Merritt, D. J., Rice, M. J., Cribb, B. W., Webb, P. D. and Zalucki, M. P. 1984. Do insects feel pain? – A biological view. Experientia 40: 164–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Enders, J. F., Weller, T. H. and Robbins, F. C. 1949. Cultivation of the Lansing strain of poliomyelitis virus in cultures of various human embryonic tissue. Science 109: 85–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Fisher, J. A. 1987. Taking sympathy seriously: a defense of our moral psychology toward animals. Environmental Ethics 9: 197–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Flemming, A. H. 1984. Ethical Considerations, 1984, cited in US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment, 1986, Alternatives to Animal Use in Research, Testing, and Education, p. 74. New York: Marcel Dekker.Google Scholar

Flexner, S. and Lewis, P. A. 1909. The transmission of acute poliomyelitis to monkeys. Journal of the American Medical Association 53: 1639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

,FRAME Toxicity Committee 1991. Animals and alternatives in toxicology: present status and future prospects. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 19: 116–38.

Franklin, A. 2007. Human–nonhuman animal relationships in Australia: an overview of results from the first national survey and follow-up case studies 2000–2004. Society and Animals 15: 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

French, R. D. 1975. Antivivisection and Medical Science in Victorian Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

French, R. D. 1978. Animal experimentation: historical aspects. In Reich, W. T. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics, Vol. 1, pp. 75–9. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

French, R. D. 1999. Dissection and Vivisection in the European Renaissance. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar

Galen, , 1956. On Anatomical Procedures, trans. Singer, C.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Galvin, S. L. and Herzog, Jr., H. A. 1998. Attitudes and dispositional optimism of animal rights demonstrators. Society and Animals 6: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gannon, W. L., Sikes, R. S.and the Animal Care and Use Committee of the American Society of Mammalogists 2007. Guidelines of the American Society of Mammalogists for the use of mammals in research. Journal of Mammalogy 88: 809–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gärtner, K., Büttner, D., Döhler, K., Friedel, R., Lindena, J. and Trautschold, I. 1980. Stress response of rats to handling and experimental procedures. Laboratory Animals 14: 267–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gaughen, S. 2005. Animal Rights: Contemporary Issues Companion. Farmington Hills, MI: Greenhaven Press.Google Scholar

Gerner, I., Liebsch, M. and Spielmann, H. 2005. Assessment of the eye irritating properties of chemicals by applying a use of QSARs and in vitro tests for the classification of eye irritation. Alternatives to Laboratory Animals 33: 215–37.Google ScholarPubMed

Gott, M. and Monamy, V. 2004. Ethics and transgenesis: towards a policy framework incorporating intrinsic objections and societal perceptions. Alternative to Laboratory Animals 32, Supplement 1: 391–6.Google Scholar

Grant, L., Hopkinson, P., Jennings, G. and Jenner, F. A. 1971. Period of adjustment of rats used for experimental studies. Nature 232: 135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Gruen, L. 1991. Animals. In Singer, P. (ed.), A Companion to Ethics, pp. 343–53. Oxford: Blackwell Reference.Google Scholar

Hakkinen, P. J. and Green, D. K. 2002. Alternatives to animal testing: information resources via the internet and world wide web. Toxicology 173: 3–11.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hamm, T. E., Dell, R. B. and Sluyters, R. C. 1995. Laboratory animal care policies and regulations: United States. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Journal 37: 75–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hart, L. A. 1998. Responsible animal care and use: moving toward a less-troubled middle ground. In Hart, L. A. (ed.), Responsible Conduct with Animals in Research, pp. 1–17. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Harvey, W. 1628/1978. Exercitatio anatomica de motu cordis et sanguinis in animalibus: being a facsimile of the 1628 Francofurti edition, together with the Keynes English translation of 1928. Birmingham, AL: Classics of Medicine Library.Google Scholar

Hawkins, P. 2002. Recognising and assessing pain, suffering and distress in laboratory animals: a survey of current practice in the UK with recommendations. Laboratory Animals 36: 378–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Howell, J. McC., Dorling, P. R. and Cook, R. D. 1983. Generalized glycogenosis type II. Comparative Pathology Bulletin 15: 2–4.Google Scholar

Hume, C. W. 1962. Man and Beast. London: UFAW.Google Scholar

Humphrey, N. K. 1983. Consciousness Regained: Chapters in the Development of Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Infield, L. 1963. Immanuel Kant: Lectures on Ethics. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar

Ingle, R. 1995. The UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Decapod Crustaceans in Captivity. London: UFAW.Google Scholar

,Institute of Laboratory Animal Resources 1995. Laboratory animal care policies and regulations. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Journal 37(2): 55–78.

Jenkins, H. L. and Adams, M. G. 1989. Progressive evaluation of skin irritancy of cosmetics using human volunteers. International Journal of Cosmetic Science 11: 141–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Kitchell, R. L. and Erickson, H. H. 1983. Introduction. In Kitchell, R. L. and Erickson, H. H. (eds.), Animal Pain: Perception and Alleviation, p. vii. Bethesda, MD: American Physiological Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Langley, G. 1989. Plea for a sensitive science. In Langley, G. (ed.), Animal Experimentation: the Consensus Changes, pp. 193–218. Oxford: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lederer, S. E. 1987. The controversy over animal experimentation in America, 1880–1914. In Rupke, N. A. (ed.), Vivisection in Historical Perspective, pp. 236–58. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Leopold, A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Linzey, A. 1989. Reverence, responsibility and rights. In Paterson, D. and Palmer, M. (eds.), The Status of Animals: Ethics, Education and Welfare, pp. 20–50. Oxford: CABI.Google Scholar

Linzey, A. and Clarke, P. A. B. 2004. Animal Rights: A Historical Anthology. Irvington, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Maehle, A.-H. and Tröhler, U. 1987. Animal experimentation from antiquity to the end of the eighteenth century: attitudes and arguments. In Rupke, N. A. (ed.), Vivisection in Historical Perspective, pp. 14–47. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Manning, H. 1887/1934. Cardinal Manning, Archbishop of Westminster on Vivisection. London: Victoria Street Society for the Protection of Animals from Vivisection. Republished Melbourne.Google Scholar

,Medical Research Council 1999. Animals in Medicine and Science. http://www.ipsos-mori.com/polls/1999/pdf/mrc99.pdf. Retrieved 12 January 2008.

,Medical Research Council 2004. Primates in Medical Research. http://www.ipsos-mori.com/polls/1999/pdf/mrc99.pdf. Retrieved 14 January 2008.

Mitchell, A. 2001. How to measure welfare of transgenic farm animals. Proceedings of a Workshop on the Welfare of Transgenic Animals, p. 20. Adelaide: ANZCCART.Google Scholar

Moberg, G. P. 2000. Biological response to stress: implications for animal welfare. In Moberg, G. P. and Mench, J. A. (eds.), The Biology of Animal Stress: Basic Principles and Implications for Animal Welfare, pp. 1–22. Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monamy, V. 2007. Editorial. Hot iron branding of seals and sea lions: Why the ban will remain. Australian Veterinary Journal 85: 485–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Monamy, V. and Gott, M. 2001. Practical and ethical considerations for students conducting ecological research involving wildlife. Austral Ecology 26: 293–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morton, D. B. 1989. The scientist's responsibility for refinement: a guide to better animal welfare and better science. In Langley, G. (ed.), Animal Experimentation: the Consensus Changes, pp. 169–92. Oxford: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morton, D. B. 2000. A systematic approach for establishing humane endpoints. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Journal 41: 80–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Morton, D. B. and Griffiths, P. H. M. 1985. Guidelines on the recognition of pain, distress and discomfort in experimental animals and an hypothesis for assessment. Veterinary Record 116: 431–6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mukerjee, M. 1997. Trends in animal research. Scientific American 276: 70–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Nash, R. F. 1990. The Rights of Nature. Sydney: Primavera Press.Google Scholar

,National Centre for the Replacement Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research 2006. NC3Rs Guidelines: Primate Accommodation, Care and Use. London: National Center for the Replacement, Refinement and Reduction of Animals in Research. http://www.nc3rs.org.uk/downloaddoc.asp?id=418. Retrieved 14 January 2008.

,National Health and Medical Research Council 1990a. Strategies for Minimising the Numbers of Animals used in Research Projects. Canberra: Australian Government Printer.

,National Health and Medical Research Council 1990b. A Guide to the Use of Australian Native Mammals in Biomedical Research. Canberra: Australian Government Printer.

,National Health and Medical Research Council 2004. Australian Code of Practice for the Care and Use of Animals for Scientific Purposes, seventh edition. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

,National Health and Medical Research Council 2008. Guidelines to Promote the Wellbeing of Animals used for Scientific Purposes: The Assessment and Alleviation of Pain and Distress in Research Animals. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

,National Institutes of Health 2005. Enrichment for Non-Human Primates. Washington DC: Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare. http://grants.nih.gov/grants/olaw/Enrichment_for_Nonhuman_Primates.pdf. Retrieved 14 January 2008.

,National Research Council 1985. Models for Biomedical Research: A New Perspective. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

,National Research Council 1988. Use of Laboratory Animals in Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

,National Research Council 1996. Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals. Washington DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.

,National Research Council 2000. Definition of Pain and Distress and Reporting Requirements for Laboratory Animals. Proceedings of the Workshop held 22 June 2000. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

,National Research Council 2008. Recognition and Alleviation of Distress in Laboratory Animals. Washington DC: National Academy Press.

Orlans, F. B. 1993. In the Name of Science: Issues in Responsible Animal Experimentation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Orlans, F. B. 2000. Public policies on assessing and reporting degrees of animal harm: international perspectives. In Balls, M., Zeller, A. M. and Halder, M. F. (eds.), Progress in the Reduction, Refinement, and Replacement of Animal Experimentation, pp. 1075–82. Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Orlans, F. B. 2003. Ethical themes of national regulations governing animal experiments: an international perspective. In Armstrong, S. J. and Botzler, R. G. (eds.), The Animal Ethics Reader, pp. 285–92. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Paton, W. D. M. 1983. Vivisection, morals, medicine: commentary from a vivisecting professor of pharmacology. Journal of Medical Ethics 9: 102–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Paton, W. D. M. 1993. Man and Mouse: Animals in Medical Research, second edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Paver, M. 1998. Legislation and regulation: a view from the UK. In Holland, A. and Johnson, A. (eds.), Animal Biotechnology and Ethics, pp. 276–87. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Phillips, M. T. and Sechzer, J. A. 1989. Animal Research and Ethical Conflict: An Analysis of the Scientific Literature 1966–1986. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Pifer, L., Shimizu, K. and Pifer, R. 1994. Public attitudes toward animal research: some international comparisons. Society and Animals 2(2). http://www.psyeta.org/sa/sa2.2/pifer.html. Retrieved 12 January 2008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Poling, A., Schlinger, H., Starin, S. and Blakely, E. 1990. Psychology: A Behavioral Overview. New York: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Poole, T. (ed.) 1999a. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, Vol. 1, Terrestrial Vertebrates. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

Poole, T. (ed.) 1999b. UFAW Handbook on the Care and Management of Laboratory Animals, Vol. 2, Amphibious and Aquatic Vertebrates and Advanced Invertebrates. Oxford: Blackwell Science.

Porter, D. G. 1992. Ethical scores for animal experiments. Nature 356: 101–2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Regan, T. 1981. Animal rights and animal experimentation. In Basson, M. D. (ed.), Rights and Responsibilities in Modern Medicine, pp. 69–83. New York: Alan R. Liss.Google Scholar

Regan, T. 1982. All That Dwell Therein: Animal Rights and Environmental Ethics. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Regan, T. 1983. The Case for Animal Rights. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Regan, T. 1985. The case for animal rights. In Singer, P. (ed.), In Defense of Animals, pp. 13–26. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar

Regan, T. 1990. The struggle for animal rights. In Clarke, P. A. B. and Linzey, A. (eds.), Political Theory and Animal Rights, pp. 176–86. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar

Regan, T. and Singer, P. (eds.) 1976. Animal Rights and Human Obligations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Remfry, J. 1987. Ethical aspects of animal experimentation. In Tuffery, A. A. (ed.), Laboratory Animals: an Introduction for New Experimenters, pp. 5–19. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Rodd, R. 1990. Biology, Ethics and Animals. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Rollin, B. E. 1981. Animal Rights and Human Morality. New York: Prometheus.Google Scholar

Rollin, B. E. 1995. Laws relevant to animal research in the United States. In Tuffery, A. A. (ed.), Laboratory Animals: an Introduction for Experimenters, second edition, pp. 67–86. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Rollin, B. E. 2003. On telos and genetic engineering. In Armstrong, S. J. and Botzler, R. G. (eds.), The Animal Ethics Reader, pp. 342–50. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Rolston, H. 1988. Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.Google Scholar

Rose, M. and Adams, D. 1989. Evidence for pain and suffering in other animals. In Langley, G. (ed.), Animal Experimentation: the Consensus Changes, pp. 42–71. Oxford: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rosenfield, L. C. 1940. From Beast-Machine to Man-Machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Rothschild, M. 1986. Animals and Man. The Romanes Lecture for 1984–85. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Rowan, A. N. 1984. Of Mice, Models and Men: A Critical Evaluation of Animal Research. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar

Rowan, A. N. and Rollin, B. E. 1983. Animal research – for and against: a philosophical, social, and historical perspective. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 27: 1–17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Rupke, N. A. 1987. Introduction. In Rupke, N. A. (ed.), Vivisection in Historical Perspective, pp. 1–13. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar

Russell, W. M. S. and Burch, R. L. 1959. The Principles of Humane Experimental Technique. London: Methuen.Google Scholar

Rutherford, K. M. D. 2002. Assessing pain in animals. Animal Welfare 11: 31–53.Google Scholar

Ryder, R. D. 1975. Victims of Science: the Use of Animals in Research. London: Davis-Poynter.Google Scholar

Ryder, R. D. 2000. Animal Revolution: Changing Attitudes Towards Speciesism, second edition. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar

Sagan, C. and Druyan, A. 1992. Shadows of Forgotten Ancestors: A Search for Who We Are. Sydney: Random House.Google Scholar

Schweitzer, A. 1936. Indian Thought and its Development. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar

Schweitzer, A. 1955. Civilization and Ethics, third edition. London: Adam and Charles Black.Google Scholar

Schweitzer, A. 1966. My Life and Thought: An Autobiography, London, Unwin Books.Google Scholar

Selassie, C. D. 2003. History of quantitative structure–activity relationships. In Abraham, D. J. (ed.), Burger's Medical Chemistry and Drug Discovery, sixth edition, pp. 1–48. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar

Selye, H. 1975. The Stress of Life, second edition. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar

Selye, H. 1976. Stress in Health and Disease. Boston, MA: Butterworths.Google Scholar

Seyfarth, R. M., Cheney, D. L. and Marler, P. 1980. Monkey responses to three different alarm calls: evidence for predator classification and semantic communication. Science 210: 801–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Shakespeare, W. 1982. Cymbeline, Act I, Scene V. The Complete Works of William Shakespeare, pp. 965–97. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Shaw, G. B. 1912. The Uselessness of the Vivisection Inspector. London: British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection.Google Scholar

Shugg, W. 1968a. Humanitarian attitudes in the early animal experiments of the Royal Society. Annals of Science 24: 227–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Shugg, W. 1968b. The Cartesian beast-machine in English literature (1663–1750). Journal of the History of Ideas 29: 279–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Singer, C. J. 1957. A Short History of Anatomy from the Greeks to Harvey, second edition. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar

Singer, P. 1975. Animal Liberation. New York: Avon Books.Google Scholar

Singer, P. 1978. Animal experimentation: philosophical perspectives. In Reich, W. T. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Bioethics, Vol. 1, pp. 79–83. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Singer, P. 1979. Practical Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Singer, P. 1990. Animal Liberation, second edition. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar

Singer, P. 1993. Practical Ethics, second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Smith, J. A. and Boyd, K. M. (eds.) 1991. Lives in the Balance: The Ethics of Using Animals in Biomedical Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.PubMed

Stephens, M. L. 1986. Maternal Deprivation Experiments in Psychology: A Critique of Animal Models. Pennsylvania, PA: The American Anti-Vivisection Society.Google Scholar

Stephens, M. L. 1989. Replacing animal experiments. In Langley, G. (ed.), Animal Experimentation: the Consensus Changes, pp. 144–68. Oxford: MacMillan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Stevens, C. 1990. Laboratory animal welfare. In Leavett, E. S. (ed.), Animals and their Legal Rights, pp. 66–105. Washington DC: Animal Welfare Institute.Google Scholar

Stone, M. 1989. Cited in Animal Experimentation, Australian Government, Senate Select Committee on Animal Welfare. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.Google Scholar

Straughan, D. W. and Balls, M. 1998. Controls on the care and use of experimental animals. In Holland, A. and Johnson, A. (eds.), Animal Biotechnology and Ethics, pp. 303–21. London: Chapman and Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Townsend, P. and Morton, D. B. 1995. Laboratory animal care policies and regulations: United Kingdom. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Journal 37: 68–74.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Turner, J. 1980. The Nature of the Beast: Animals, Pain and Humanity in the Victorian Mind. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Turner, J. 2000. Reckoning with the Beast: Animals, Pain, and Humanity in the Victorian Mind. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Tyebkhan, G. 2003. Declaration of Helsinki: the ethical cornerstone of human clinical research. Research Methodology 69: 245–7.Google ScholarPubMed

,UK Home Office 1999. Report of the Animal Procedures Committee for 1998. London: The Stationery Office.

,UK Home Office 2007. Statistics of Scientific Procedures on Living Animals, Great Britain 2006. London: The Stationery Office. http://www.archive2.official-documents.co.uk/document/cm62/6291/6291-old.pdf. Retrieved 12 January 2008.

,UK Home Office 2008a. Animals in Scientific Procedures: Better Regulation. http://scienceandresearch.homeoffice.gov.uk/animal-research/better-regulation/. Retrieved 12 January 2008.

,UK Home Office 2008b. Animals (Scientific Procedures) Inspectorate. http://scienceandresearch.homeoffice.gov.uk/animal-research/aboutus/aspinspectorate/. Retrieved 12 January 2008.

,UK Home Office 2008c. Animals in Scientific Procedures: the Ethical Review Process. http://scienceandresearch.homeoffice.gov.uk/animal-research/publications-and-reference/publications/guidance/ethical-review-process/ethicalprocess.pdf. Retrieved 12 January 2008.

,Universities Federation for Animal Welfare and Fund for the Replacement of Animals in Medical Experiments 1998. Selection and Use of Replacement Methods in Animal Experimentation. London: UFAW.

,US Congress, Office of Technology Assessment 1986. Alternatives to Animal Use in Research, Testing, and Education. Washington DC: US Government Printing Office.

,US Department of Agriculture 2006. Animal Welfare Act: Code of Federal Regulations, Title 9, Chapter 1, Subchapter A – Animal Welfare. http://www.access.gpo.gov/nara/cfr/waisidx_06/9cfr1_06.html. Retrieved 12 January 2008.

Voltaire, , 1764/1962. Philosophical Dictionary, pp. 112–13, trans. Gay, P.New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Wade, N. 1978. New vaccine may bring man and chimpanzee into tragic conflict. Science 200: 1027–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wall, P. D. 1992. Humane treatment of animals does not mean treating animals as humans. In Kuchel, T. R., Rose, M. and Burrell, J. (eds.), Animal Pain: Ethical and Scientific Perspectives, pp. 1–12. Adelaide: ACCART.Google Scholar

Walsh, M. and Richmond, J. 2005. Regulation of animal experimentation in the United Kingdom. School Science Review 87: 85–9.Google Scholar

Weiss, J. M. 1972. Psychological factors in stress and disease. Scientific American 226: 104–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wells, D. J., Playle, L. C., Enser, W. E., Flecknell, P. A., Gardiner, M. A., Holland, J., Howard, B. R., Hubrecht, R., Humphreys, K. R., Jackson, I. J., Lane, N., Maconochie, M., Mason, G., Morton, D. B., Raymond, R., Robinson, V., Smith, J. A. and Watt, N. 2006. Assessing the welfare of genetically altered mice. Laboratory Animals 40: 111–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Wilkins, D. 1997. Animal Welfare in Europe: European Legislation and Concerns. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.Google Scholar

Wise, S. M. 2000. Rattling the Cage: Towards Legal Rights for Animals. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar

Wong, J. 1995. Laboratory animal care policies and regulations: Canada. Institute for Laboratory Animal Research Journal 37: 57–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

,World Health Organization 1985. Guiding Principles for Biomedical Research Involving Animals. Geneva: Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences.