Acosta-Hughes, B. 2002. Polyeideia: The Iambi of Callimachus and the Archaic Iambic Tradition. Berkeley and London.Google Scholar

Acosta-Hughes, B. 2010. Arion’s Lyre: Archaic Lyric into Hellenistic Poetry. Princeton.Google Scholar

Acosta-Hughes, B., Stephens, S. 2002. ‘Rereading Callimachus’ Aetia Fragment 1’, CPh 97: 238–55.Google Scholar

Ager, S. 1996. Interstate Arbitration in the Greek World, 337–90 BC. Berkeley and Los Angeles.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Alcock, S. 1997. ‘The heroic past in a Hellenistic present’, in Cartledge, P., Garnsey, P., Gruen, E. S. (eds.), Hellenistic Constructs: Essays in Culture, History and Historiography (Berkeley and London): 20–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ardizzoni, A. 1967. Le Argonautiche libro I. Rome.Google Scholar

Asheri, D., Lloyd, A., Corcella, A. 2007. Herodotus Books I–IV (edited by Murray, O., Moreno, A.). Oxford.Google Scholar

Asper, M. 2013. ‘Minding the gap: aetiology and (false) closure’, in Grewing, F., Acosta-Hughes, B., Kirichenko, A. (eds.), The Door Ajar: False Closure in Greek and Roman Literature and Art (Heidelberg): 63–82.Google Scholar

Bagordo, A. 2003. Reminiszenzen früher Lyrik bei den attischen Tragikern: Beiträge zur Anspielungstechnik und poetischen Tradition. Munich.Google Scholar

Bakhtin, M. M. 1981. Dialogic Imagination (translated by Emerson, C., Holquist, M.). Austin.Google Scholar

Bakker, E. 2002. ‘The making of history: Herodotus’ Historiēs Apodexis’, in Bakker, E., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden): 3–32.Google Scholar

Bal, M. 1985. Narratology. Toronto and London.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E. 2008. Motivation and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E., de Bakker, M. (eds.), 2012a. Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Baragwanath, E., de Bakker, M. 2012b. ‘Introduction’, in Baragwanath, E., de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford): 1–56.Google Scholar

Baraz, Y., van den Berg, C. 2013. ‘Intertextuality: introduction’, AJPh 134: 1–8.Google Scholar

Barbantani, S. 2001. Φάτις νικηφόρος. Milan.Google Scholar

Barbantani, S. 2003. ‘Callimachus and the contemporary historical “epic”’, Hermathena 173/4: 29–47.Google Scholar

Barchiesi, A. 2001. ‘The crossing’, in Harrison, S. J. (ed.), Texts, Ideas, and the Classics: Scholarship, Theory, and Classical Literature (Oxford): 142–63.Google Scholar

Barthes, R. 1974. S/Z (translated by Miller, R.). New York.Google Scholar

Berkowitz, G. 2004. Semi-Public Narration in Apollonius’ Argonautica. Leuven.Google Scholar

Bertelli, L. 2002. ‘Perì basileias: i trattati sulla regalità dal IV secolo a.C.’, in Bettiolo, P., Filoramo, G. (eds.), Il dio mortale: teologie politiche tra antico e contemporeaneo (Brescia): 17–61.Google Scholar

Bettenworth, A. 2005. ‘Odysseus bei Aietes: primäre und sekondäre Intertexte bei Apollonios Rhodios’, in Harder, A., Cuypers, M. (eds.), Beginning from Apollo: Studies in Apollonius Rhodius and the Argonautic Tradition (Leuven): 1–17.Google Scholar

Beye, C. R. 1982. Epic and Romance in the Argonautica of Apollonius. Carbondale.Google Scholar

Beye, C. R. 1999. ‘Vergil and Apollonius’, in Perkell, C. G. (ed.), Reading Vergil’s Aeneid (Norman): 271–84.Google Scholar

Bichler, R. 2000. Herodots Welt. Berlin.Google Scholar

Bilde, P., Engberg-Pedersen, T., Hannestad, L., Zahle, J. 1996. ‘Introduction’, in Bilde, P., Engberg-Pedersen, T., Hannestad, L., Zahle, J. (eds.), Aspects of Hellenistic Kingship (Aarhus): 9–14.Google Scholar

Bing, P. 1988. The Well-Read Muse. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Boedeker, D. 2000. ‘Herodotus’ genres’, in Depew, M., Obbink, D. (eds.), Matrices of Genres (Cambridge and London): 97–114.Google Scholar

Bosworth, A. B. 1988. From Arrian to Alexander: Studies in Historical Interpretation. Oxford.Google Scholar

Bowersock, G. 1994. Fiction as History: Nero to Julian. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Bowie, A. M. 2007. Herodotus: Histories Book VIII. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. 1986. ‘Early Greek elegy, symposium and public festival’, JHS 106: 13–35.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. 1993. ‘Lies, fiction and slander in early Greek poetry’, in Gill, C., Wiseman, T. P. (eds.), Lies and Fiction in the Ancient World (Exeter): 1–37.Google Scholar

Bowie, E. L. 2001. ‘Early Greek Iambic poetry: the importance of narrative’, in Cavarzere, A., Aloni, A., Barchiesi, A. (eds.), Iambic Ideas (Lanham): 1–27.Google Scholar

Brock, R. 2003. ‘Authorial voice and narrative management in Herodotus’, in Derow, P., Parker, R. (eds.), Herodotus and His World (Oxford): 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bulloch, A. W. 1985a. ‘Hellenistic poetry’, in Easterling, P. E., Knox, B. M. W. (eds.), Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. 1, part 4 (Cambridge): 541–621.Google Scholar

Bulloch, A. W. 1985b. Callimachus: The Fifth Hymn. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Bulloch, A. W. 2010. ‘Hymns and encomia’, in Clauss, J. J., Cuypers, M. (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature (Malden and Oxford): 166–80.Google Scholar

Burton, A. 1972. Diodorus Siculus Book 1: A Commentary. Leiden.Google Scholar

Byre, C. S. 2002. A Reading of Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica: The Poetics of Uncertainty. Lewiston and Lampeter.Google Scholar

Calame, C. 2003. Myth and History in Ancient Greece (translated by Berman, D. W.). Princeton.Google Scholar

Cameron, A. 1995. Callimachus and His Critics. Princeton.Google Scholar

Carspecken, J. 1952. ‘Apollonius Rhodius and the Homeric epic’, YClS 13: 33–143.Google Scholar

Cartledge, P. 1993. The Greeks: A Portrait of Self and Others. Oxford.Google Scholar

Caswell, C. 1990. A Study of Thumos in Early Greek Epic. Leiden.Google Scholar

Chaniotis, A. 1988. Historie und Historiker in den griechischen Inschriften. Epigraphische Beiträge zur griechischen Historiographie. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Chatman, S. 1978. Story and Discourse. Ithaca and London.Google Scholar

Chiasson, C. 2012. ‘Herodotus’ Prologue and the Greek poetic tradition’, Histos 6: 114–43.Google Scholar

Clare, R. 2002. The Path of the Argo. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. 1999. Between Geography and History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clarke, K. 2008. Making Time for the Past: Local History and the Polis. Oxford.Google Scholar

Clausen, W. 1964. ‘An interpretation of the Aeneid’, HSPh 68: 139–47.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. 1993. The Best of the Argonauts. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Clauss, J. J. 2012. ‘The Argonautic anabasis: myth and Hellenic identity in Apollonius’ Argonautica’, in Cusset, C., Le Meur-Weissman, N., Levin, F. (eds.), Mythe et pouvoir à l’époque hellénistique (Leuven): 417–37.Google Scholar

Cobet, J. 2002. ‘The organization of time in the Histories’, in Bakker, E., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden): 387–412.Google Scholar

Cohn, D. 1989. ‘Fictional versus historical lives’, The Journal of Narrative Technique 19.1: 3–24.Google Scholar

Cohn, D. 1990. ‘Signposts of fictionality’, Poetics Today 11.4: 774–804.Google Scholar

Cohn, D. 1999. The Distinction of Fiction. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Connor, W. R. 1985. ‘Historical writing in the fourth century BC and the Hellenistic period’, in Easterling, P. E., Knox, B. M. W. (eds.), Cambridge History of Classical Literature, vol. 1 (Cambridge): 458–71.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. 1985. Memoria dei poeti e sistema letterario, rev. edn. Turin.Google Scholar

Conte, G. B. 1986. The Rhetoric of Imitation (edited by Segal, C.). Ithaca.Google Scholar

Cusset, C. 2004. ‘Les Argonautiques d’Apollonios de Rhodes comme itinéraire à travers la sauvagerie’, in Charpentier, M.-C. (ed.), Les Espaces du sauvage dans le monde antique (Besançon): 31–52.Google Scholar

Cuypers, M. 2004. ‘Apollonius of Rhodes’, in de Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R., Bowie, A. M. (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature (Leiden): 43–62.Google Scholar

Cuypers, M. 2005. Review of Byre 2002, Mnemosyne 58: 600–3.Google Scholar

Darbo-Peschanski, C. 1985. ‘Les logoi des autres dans les Histoires d’Hérodote’, Quaderni di Storia 22: 105–28.Google Scholar

Darbo-Peschanski, C. 1987. Le discourse du particulier: essai sur l’enquête hérodotéenne. Paris.Google Scholar

DeForest, M. M. 1994. Apollonius’ Argonautica: A Callimachean Epic. Leiden.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. 1987. Narrators and Focalizers. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. 1999. ‘Aspects narratologiques des Histoires d’Hérodote’, Lalies 19: 217–75.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. 2001. A Narratological Commentary on the Odyssey. Cambridge.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. 2012. ‘The Helen logos and Herodotus’ fingerprint’, in Baragwanath, E., de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford): 127–42.Google Scholar

De Jong, I. J. F. 2014. Narratology and Classics: A Practical Guide. Oxford.Google Scholar

Delage, E. 1930. La géographie dans les Argonautiques d’Apollonios de Rhodes. Bordeaux.Google Scholar

De Ste Croix, G. E. M. 1975. ‘Aristotle on history and poetry’, in Levick, B. (ed.), The Ancient Historian and His Materials (Farnborough): 45–58.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. 1987. ‘Narrative surface and authorial voice in Herodotus’ Histories’, Arethusa 20: 147–70.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. 1990. Review of Hartog 1988, CPh 85: 217–24.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. 2002. ‘“I didn’t give my own genealogy”: Herodotus and the authorial persona’, in Bakker, E., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden): 267–89.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. 2003. ‘Form and content: the question of tyranny in Herodotus’, in Morgan, K. A. (ed.), Popular Tyranny: Sovereignty and its Discontents in Ancient Greece (Austin): 25–58.Google Scholar

Dewald, C. 2012. ‘Myth and legend in Herodotus’ first book’, in Baragwanath, E., de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford): 59–85.Google Scholar

Dillery, J. 2007. ‘Clio’s other sons: Berossus and Manetho’, in Marincola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography (Malden and Oxford): 221–30.Google Scholar

Dougherty, C. 1994. ‘Archaic Greek foundation poetry: questions of genre and occasion’, JHS 114: 35–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dufner, C. M. 1988. ‘The Odyssey in the Argonautica: reminiscence, revision, reconstruction’, unpublished dissertation, Princeton University.Google Scholar

Edmunds, L. 2001. Intertextuality and the Reading of Roman Poetry. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Eliade, M. 1955. The Myth of the Eternal Return or, Cosmos and History (translated by Trask, W. R.). London.Google Scholar

Eliade, M. 1969. ‘Cosmogonic myth and “sacred history”’, in The Quest: History and Meaning in Religion (Chicago): 72–87.Google Scholar

Endsjø, D. 1997. ‘Placing the unplaceable: the making of Apollonius’ Argonautic geography’, GRBS 38: 373–85.Google Scholar

Engels, J. 2008. ‘Universal history and cultural geography of the oikumene in Herodotus’ Historiai and Strabo’s Geographica’, in Pigón, J. (ed.), The Children of Herodotus (Newcastle upon Tyne): 144–61.Google Scholar

Erbse, H. 1956. ‘Der erste Satz im Werke Herodots’, in Erbse, H. (ed.), Festschrift Bruno Snell (Munich): 209–22.Google Scholar

Erskine, A. 1995. ‘Culture and power in Ptolemaic Egypt: the Museum and Library of Alexandria’, G&R 42: 38–48.Google Scholar

Erskine, A. 2002. ‘Life after death: Alexandria and the body of Alexander’, G&R 49: 163–79.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. 1993. ‘Il sistema letterario della poesia alessandrina nel III sec. A.C.’, in Cambiano, G., Canfora, L., Lanza, D. (eds.), Lo spazio letterario della Grecia antica, vol. I.2 (Rome): 31–73.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. 2001. ‘“Homeric” formularity in the Argonautica of Apollonius of Rhodes’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius (Leiden): 171–91.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M. 2005. ‘“Posidippus” at court: the contribution of the Hippika of P.Mil.Vogl. VIII 309 to the ideology of Ptolemaic kingship’, in Gutzwiller, K. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book (Oxford): 249–68.Google Scholar

Fantuzzi, M., Hunter, R. 2004. Tradition and Innovation in Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Farrell, J. 2003. ‘Classical genre in theory and practice’, New Literary History 34: 383–408.Google Scholar

Fearn, D. 2007. ‘Narrating ambiguity: murder and Macedonian allegiance (5.17–22)’, in Irwin, E., Greenwood, E. (eds.), Reading Herodotus (Cambridge): 98–127.Google Scholar

Feeney, D. C. 1991. The Gods in Epic. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fehling, D. 1989. Herodotus and his ‘Sources’: Citation, Invention and Narrative Art (translated by Howie, J. G.). Leeds.Google Scholar

Fehling, D. 1994. ‘The art of Herodotus and the margins of the world’, in von Martels, Z. (ed.), Travel Fact and Travel Fiction: Studies on Fiction, Literary Tradition, Scholarly Discovery, and Observation in Travel Writing (Leiden): 1–15.Google Scholar

Fitzsimons, S. 2017. ‘The leadership styles of the Persian kings in Herodotus’ Histories’, unpublished dissertation, University of Manchester.Google Scholar

Fleischer, R. 1996. ‘Hellenistic royal iconography on coins’, in Bilde, P., Engberg-Pedersen, T., Hannestad, L., Zahle, J. (eds.), Aspects of Hellenistic Kingship (Aarhus): 28–40.Google Scholar

Flower, M., Marincola, J. 2002. Herodotus: Histories Book IX. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Fornara, C. 1983. The Nature of History in Greece and Rome. Berkeley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Forsdyke, S. 2006. ‘Herodotus, political history and political thought’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (ed.), Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 224–41.Google Scholar

Foster, E., Lateiner, D. (ed.), 2012a. Thucydides and Herodotus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Foster, E., Lateiner, D. 2012b. ‘Introduction’, in Foster, E., Lateiner, D. (eds.), Thucydides and Herodotus (Oxford): 1–9.Google Scholar

Fowler, D. 1997. ‘On the shoulders of giants: intertextuality and classical studies’, MD 39: 13–34.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. 1996. ‘Herodotos and his contemporaries’, JHS 116: 62–87.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. 2001. ‘Early Historiē and literacy’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus (Oxford): 95–115.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. 2010. ‘Gods in early Greek historiography’, in Bremmer, J. N., Erskine, A. (eds.), The Gods of Ancient Greece: Identities and Transformations (Edinburgh): 318–34.Google Scholar

Fowler, R. 2013. Early Greek Mythography II: Commentary. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. 1961. Apollonii Rhodii Argonautica. Oxford.Google Scholar

Fränkel, H. 1968. Noten zu den Argonautika des Apollonios. Munich.Google Scholar

Fraser, P. 1996. Cities of Alexander the Great. Oxford.Google Scholar

Frede, D. 1992. ‘Necessity, chance, and “what happens for the most part” in Aristotle’s Poetics’, in Rorty, A. O. (ed.), Essays on Aristotle’s Poetics (Princeton): 197–219.Google Scholar

Fusillo, M. 1985. Il tempo delle Argonautiche. Rome.Google Scholar

Fusillo, M. 2008. ‘Apollonius Rhodius as “inventor” of the interior monologue’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 147–66.Google Scholar

Genette, G. 1980. Narrative Discourse (translated by Lewin, J.). Oxford.Google Scholar

Giangiulio, M. 2001. ‘Constructing the past: colonial traditions and the writing of history. The case of Cyrene’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus (Oxford): 116–37.Google Scholar

Giangrande, G. 1967. ‘“Arte allusiva” and Alexandrian epic poetry’, CQ 17: 85–97.Google Scholar

Giubilo, B. 2008. ‘L’ ἀλήθεια e i suoi sinonimi nella poesia alessandrina (Callimaco, Teocrito, Apollonio Rodio, Eronda)’, unpublished dissertation, University of Rome ‘Tor Vergata’.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 1991. The Poet’s Voice. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Goldhill, S. 2002. The Invention of Prose. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gould, J. 1994. ‘Herodotus and religion’, in Hornblower, S. (ed.), Greek Historiography. Oxford.Google Scholar

Gozzoli, S. 1970/1. ‘Una teoria antica sull’origine della storiografia greca’, SCO 19/20: 158–211.Google Scholar

Greenberg, J. 2007. ‘Why can’t biologists read poetry? Ian McEwan’s Enduring Love’, Twentieth Century Literature 53: 93–124.Google Scholar

Griffin, J. 1986. ‘Homeric words and speakers’, JHS 106: 41–62.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A. H. 1999. ‘Euenius the negligent nightwatchman (Herodotus 9.92–6)’, in Buxton, R. (ed.), From Myth to Reason? Studies in the Development of Greek Thought (Oxford): 169–82.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A. H. 2006. ‘Stories and storytelling in the Histories’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 130–44.Google Scholar

Griffiths, A. H. (in press). Herodotus: Histories Book III. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Groten, F. 1963. ‘Herodotus’ use of variant versions’, Phoenix 17: 79–87.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. 1996. ‘Hellenistic kingship: puzzles, problems, and possibilities’, in Bilde, P., Engberg-Pedersen, T., Hannestad, L., Zahle, J. (eds.), Aspects of Hellenistic Kingship (Aarhus): 115–25.Google Scholar

Gruen, E. 2011. Rethinking the Other in Antiquity. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar

Hainsworth, J. B. 1993. The Iliad: A Commentary Volume III: Books 9–12. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hall, J. M. 2001. ‘Contested ethnicities: perceptions of Macedonia within evolving definitions of Greek identity’, in Malkin, I. (ed.), Ancient Perceptions of Greek Ethnicity (Cambridge): 159–86.Google Scholar

Halliwell, S. 2002. The Aesthetics of Mimesis: Ancient Texts and Modern Problems. Princeton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Hamburger, K. 1968. Logik der Dichtung, second edn. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Harder, M. A. 1994. ‘Travel descriptions in the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius’, in von Martels, Z. (ed.), Travel Fact and Travel Fiction: Studies on Fiction, Literary Tradition, Scholarly Discovery, and Observation in Travel Writing (Leiden): 16–29.Google Scholar

Harder, M. A. 2002. ‘Intertextuality in Callimachus’ Aetia’, in Lehnus, L., Montanari, F. (eds.), Callimaque (Geneva): 189–233.Google Scholar

Harder, M. A. 2012. Callimachus: Aetia (2 vols.). Oxford.Google Scholar

Harder, M. A. 2013. ‘Intertextuality as discourse: the discussion on poetry and poetics among Hellenistic Greek poets in the third century bce’, in Bauks, M., Horowitz, W., Lange, A. (eds.), Between Text and Text (Göttingen): 232–42.Google Scholar

Harding, P. 1994. Androtion and the Atthis: The Fragments. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harding, P. 2007. ‘Local history and Atthidography’, in Marincola, J. (ed.), A Companion to Greek and Roman Historiography (Malden and Oxford): 180–8.Google Scholar

Harrison, T. 2000. Divinity and History. Oxford.Google Scholar

Harrison, T. 2003. ‘The cause of things: envy and the emotions in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Konstan, D., Rutter, N. K. (eds.), Envy, Spite and Jealousy: The Rivalrous Emotions in Ancient Greece (Edinburgh): 143–63.Google Scholar

Hartog, F. 1988. The Mirror of Herodotus (translated by Lloyd, J.). Berkeley.Google Scholar

Haslam, M. W. 1993. ‘Callimachus’ Hymns’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Callimachus (Leuven): 111–25.Google Scholar

Hazzard, R. 2000. Imagination of a Monarchy: Studies in Ptolemaic Propaganda. Toronto.Google Scholar

Heubeck, A., West, S., Hainsworth, J. B. 1988. A Commentary on Homer’s Odyssey: Books I–VIII, vol. 1. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hexter, R. 2006. ‘Literary history as a provocation to reception studies’, in Martindale, C., Thomas, R. F. (eds.), Classics and the Uses of Reception (Malden and Oxford): 23–31.Google Scholar

Higbie, C. 2003. The Lindian Chronicle and the Greek Creation of Their Past. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hinds, S. 1998. Allusion and Intertext. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hodkinson, O. 2010. ‘Some distinguishing features of deliberate fictionality in Greek biographical narratives’, in Borghart, P., de Temmermann, K. (eds.), Biography and Fictionality in the Greek Literary Tradition (Phrasis special issue 51.1): 11–35.Google Scholar

Hollmann, A. 2005. The Master of Signs: Signs and the Interpretation of Signs in Herodotus’ Histories. Cambridge and London.Google Scholar

Hollmann, A. 2011. ‘The manipulation of signs in Herodotos’ “Histories”’, TAPhA 135: 279–327.Google Scholar

Hopkinson, N. 1988. A Hellenistic Anthology. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. 1991. Commentary on Thucydides Volume I: Books I–III. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. 1996. Commentary on Thucydides, Volume II: Books IV–V.24. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. 2002. ‘Herodotus and his sources of information’, in Bakker, E., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden): 373–86.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. 2004. Thucydides and Pindar. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. 2006. ‘Herodotus’ influence in antiquity’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 306–18.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. 2008. Commentary on Thucydides: Volume III: Books 5.25–8.109. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. 2013. Herodotus: Histories Book V. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hornblower, S. 2015. Lykophron: Alexandra. Oxford.Google Scholar

How, W. W., Wells, J. 1913. A Commentary on Herodotus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. 1987. ‘Medea’s flight: the fourth book of the Argonautica’, CQ 37: 129–39.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. 1988. ‘“Short on heroics”: Jason in the Argonautica’, CQ 38: 436–53.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. 1989. Apollonius of Rhodes: Argonautica Book III. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. 1991. ‘Greek and non-Greek in the Argonautica of Apollonius’, in Saïd, S. (ed.), ΕΛΛΗΝΙΣΜΟΣ (Strasbourg): 81–99.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. 1992. ‘Writing the God: form and meaning in Callimachus, Hymn to Athena’, MD 29: 9–34.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. 1993. The Argonautica of Apollonius: Literary Studies. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. 1996. Theocritus and the Archaeology of Greek Poetry. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. 2003. Theocritus: Encomium of Ptolemy Philadelphus. Berkeley and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. 2004. ‘Theocritus and Moschus’, in de Jong, I. J. F., Nünlist, R., Bowie, A. M. (eds.), Narrators, Narratees, and Narratives in Ancient Greek Literature (Leiden): 83–97.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. 2008. ‘The poetics of narrative in the Argonautica’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 115–46.Google Scholar

Hunter, R. L. 2015. Apollonius of Rhodes: Argonautica Book IV. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Hunter, R., Fuhrer, T. 2002. ‘Imaginary gods? Poetic theology in the Hymns of Callimachus’, in Lehnus, L., Montanari, F. (eds.), Callimaque (Geneva): 143–87.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. 1988. Hellenistic Poetry. Oxford.Google Scholar

Hutchinson, G. O. 2003. ‘The Aetia: Callimachus’ poem of knowledge’, ZPE 145: 47–59.Google Scholar

Immerwahr, H. 1954. ‘Historical action in Herodotus’, TAPhA 85: 16–45.Google Scholar

Immerwahr, H. 1966. Form and Thought in Herodotus. Cleveland.Google Scholar

Isager, S. 2004. ‘The Salmakis inscription: some reactions to the edition princeps’, in Isager, S., Pedersen, P. (eds.), The Salmakis Inscription and Hellenistic Halikarnassos (Odense): 9–13.Google Scholar

Iser, W. 1989. Prospecting: From Reader Response to Literary Anthropology. Baltimore and London.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. 1909. ‘Über die Entwicklung der griechischen Historiographie und den Plan einer neuen Sammlung der griechischen Historikerfragmente’, Klio 9: 80–123.Google Scholar

Jacoby, F. 1949. Atthis: The Local Chronicles of Ancient Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar

Jacques, J.-M. 1986–7. ‘Apollonios de Memphis’, CCGR 5: 67–77.Google Scholar

Jauss, H.-R. 1982. Towards an Aesthetic of Reception (translated by Bahti, T.). Brighton.Google Scholar

Johnson, W. R. 1976. Darkness Visible: A Study of Vergil’s ‘Aeneid’. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Karttunen, K. 2002. ‘The ethnography of the fringes’, in Bakker, E., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden): 457–74.Google Scholar

Kelly, A. 2014. ‘Apollonius and the end of the Aeneid’, CQ 64: 642–8.Google Scholar

Knight, V. 1995. The Renewal of Epic. Leiden.Google Scholar

Koenen, L. 1993. ‘The Ptolemaic king as a religious figure’, in Bulloch, A., Gruen, E. S., Long, A. A., Stewart, A. (eds.), Images and Ideologies (Berkeley): 25–115.Google Scholar

Köhnken, A. 2010. ‘Apollonius’ Argonautica’, in Clauss, J. J., Cuypers, M. (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature (Malden and Oxford): 136–50.Google Scholar

Kowalzig, B. 2007. Singing for the Gods: Performances of Myth and Ritual in Archaic and Classical Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar

Krevans, N. 2000. ‘On the margins of epic: the foundation poems of Apollonius’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Apollonius Rhodius (Leuven): 69–84.Google Scholar

Krevans, N. 2004. ‘Callimachus and the pedestrian Muse’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Callimachus II (Leuven): 173–83.Google Scholar

Krischer, T. 1965. ‘Herodots Prooimion’, Hermes 93: 159–67.Google Scholar

Kroll, W. 1924. Studien zum Verständnis der römischen Literatur. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Kurke, L. 1991. The Traffic in Praise. Ithaca.Google Scholar

Laird, A. 1999. Powers of Expression, Expressions of Power. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lateiner, D. 1989. The Historical Method of Herodotus. Toronto and London.Google Scholar

Lesky, A. 1961. Göttliche und menschliche Motivation im homerischen Epos. Heidelberg.Google Scholar

Levin, D. N. 1971. Apollonius’ Argonautica Re-Examined: The Neglected First and Second Books. Leiden.Google Scholar

Livrea, E. 1973. Argonauticon liber quartus. Florence.Google Scholar

Livrea, E. 1979. ‘Da Pagasai a Lemnos’, SIFC 51: 146–54.Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. B. 1988. ‘Herodotus on Egyptians and Libyans’, in Nenci, G., Reverdin, O. (eds.), Hérodote et les peuples non grecs (Geneva): 215–54.Google Scholar

Lloyd, A. B. 2000. ‘Ptolemaic Egypt’, in Shaw, I. (ed.), Oxford History of Ancient Egypt (Oxford): 395–421.Google Scholar

Lloyd-Jones, H. 1990. ‘A Hellenistic miscellany’, in Lloyd-Jones, H. (ed.), Academic Papers, vol. 2 (Oxford): 231–49.Google Scholar

Lombardo, M. 1988. ‘Erodoto Storico dei Lidî’, in Nenci, G., Reverdin, O. (eds.), Hérodote et les peuples non grecs (Geneva): 171–214.Google Scholar

Lowe, N. 2001. The Classical Plot and the Invention of Western Narrative. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Luraghi, N. 2001. ‘Local knowledge in Herodotus’ Histories’, in Luraghi, N. (ed.), The Historian’s Craft in the Age of Herodotus (Oxford): 138–60.Google Scholar

Luraghi, N. 2006. ‘Meta-historiê: method and genre in the Histories’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 76–91.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1987. Further Voices in Vergil’s ‘Aeneid’. Oxford.Google Scholar

Lyne, R. O. A. M. 1994. ‘Vergil’s Aeneid: subversion by intertextuality: Catullus 66.39–40 and other examples’, G&R 41: 187–204.Google Scholar

Ma, J. 1999. Antiochos III and the Cities of Western Asia Minor. Oxford.Google Scholar

Ma, J. 2003. ‘Kings’, in Erskine, A. (ed.), A Companion to the Hellenistic World (Malden and Oxford): 175–95.Google Scholar

McGing, B. 2012. ‘Polybius and Herodotus’, in Smith, C., Yarrow, L. M. (eds.), Imperialism, Cultural Politics, and Polybius (Oxford): 33–49.Google Scholar

Magnelli, E. 2010. ‘Nicander’, in Harder, A., Cuypers, M. (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature (Malden and Oxford): 211–23.Google Scholar

Malkin, I. 1994. Myth and Territory in the Spartan Mediterranean. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Malkin, I. 2003. ‘“Tradition” in Herodotus: the foundation of Cyrene’, in Derow, P., Parker, R. (eds.), Herodotus and His World (Oxford): 153–70.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. 1987. ‘Herodotean narrative and the narrator’s presence’, Arethusa 20: 121–42.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. 1997. Authority and Tradition in Ancient Historiography. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. 1999. ‘Genre, convention and innovation in Greco-Roman historiography’, in Kraus, C. (ed.), The Limits of Historiography: Genre and Narrative in Ancient Historical Texts (Leiden) 281–324.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. 2001. Greek Historians. Oxford.Google Scholar

Marincola, J. 2007. ‘Odysseus and the historians’, Syllecta Classica 18: 1–79.Google Scholar

Meyer, D. 2008. ‘Apollonius as a Hellenistic geographer’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 267–86.Google Scholar

Minton, W. W. 1960. ‘Homer’s invocations of the Muses: traditional patterns’, TAPhA 91: 292–309.Google Scholar

Moles, J. 1996. ‘Herodotus warns the Athenians’, PLLS 9: 259–84.Google Scholar

Mooney, G. W. 1912. The Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. London.Google Scholar

Mori, A. 2001. ‘Personal favor and public influence: Arete, Arsinoe II, and the Argonautica’, Oral Tradition 16: 85–106.Google Scholar

Mori, A. 2005. ‘Jason’s reconciliation with Telamon: a moral exemplar in Apollonius’ Argonautica’, AJPh 109: 209–36.Google Scholar

Mori, A. 2008a. The Politics of Apollonius Rhodius’ Argonautica. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Mori, A. 2008b. ‘Piety and diplomacy in Apollonius’ Argonautica’, in McKechnie, P. R., Guillaume, P. (eds.), Ptolemy Philadelphus and his World (Leiden): 149–69.Google Scholar

Morrison, A. D. 2007. The Narrator in Archaic Greek and Hellenistic Poetry. Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Morrison, A. D. 2011. ‘Callimachus’ Muses’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Lehnus, L., Stephens, S. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Callimachus (Leiden): 329–48.Google Scholar

Moyer, I. 2013. ‘Berossos and Manetho’, in Haubold, J., Lanfranchi, G. B., Rollinger, R., Steele, R. (eds.), The World of Berossos (Wiesbaden): 213–33.Google Scholar

Munson, R. V. 2001. Telling Wonders. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Munson, R. V. 2007. ‘The trouble with the Ionians: Herodotus and the beginning of the Ionian Revolt’, in Irwin, E., Greenwood, E. (eds.), Reading Herodotus (Cambridge): 146–67.Google Scholar

Munson, R. V. 2009. ‘Who are Herodotus’ Persians?’, CW 102: 457–70.Google Scholar

Muntz, C. 2011. ‘The sources of Diodorus Siculus, book 1’, CQ 61: 574–94.Google Scholar

Murray, O. 1967. ‘Aristeas and Ptolemaic kingship’, JThS 18: 337–71.Google Scholar

Murray, O. 1970. ‘Hecataeus of Abdera and Pharaonic kingship’, JEA 56: 141–71.Google Scholar

Murray, O. 1972. ‘Herodotus and Hellenistic culture’, CQ 22: 200–13.Google Scholar

Murray, O. 1996. ‘Hellenistic royal symposia’, in Bilde, P., Engberg-Pedersen, T., Hannestad, L., Zahle, J. (eds.), Aspects of Hellenistic Kingship (Aarhus): 15–27.Google Scholar

Murray, O. 2007. ‘Philosophy and monarchy in the Hellenistic world’, in Rajak, T., Pearce, S., Aitken, J., Dines, J. (eds.), Jewish Perspectives on Hellenistic Rulers (Berkeley): 13–28.Google Scholar

Murray, O. 2008. ‘Ptolemaic royal patronage’, in McKechnie, P. R., Guillaume, P. (eds.), Ptolemy II Philadelphus and His World (Leiden): 9–24.Google Scholar

Murray, P. 2002. ‘Plato’s Muses’, in Spentzou, E., Fowler, D. (eds.), Cultivating the Muse (Oxford): 29–46.Google Scholar

Murray, P. 2004. ‘The Muses and their arts’, in Murray, P., Wilson, P. (eds.), Music and the Muses: The Culture of Mousike in the Classical Athenian City (Oxford): 365–89.Google Scholar

Murray, P. 2005. ‘The Muses: creativity personified?’, in Herrin, J., Stafford, E. (eds.), Personification in the Greek World (Aldershot): 147–59.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. 1987. ‘Herodotus the Logios’, Arethusa 20: 175–84.Google Scholar

Nagy, G. 1990. Pindar’s Homer. Baltimore.Google Scholar

Nelis, D. 2001. Vergil’s Aeneid and the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. Leeds.Google Scholar

Nelis, D. 2008. ‘Apollonius and Virgil’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.) Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 341–62.Google Scholar

Orth, E. 1925. ‘Ein Fragment des Herodorus. Zu Demetrios par. 66’, Philologische Wochenschrift 45: 778–83.Google Scholar

Paap, A. 1948. De Herodoti reliquiis in papyris et membranis Aegyptiis servatis. Leiden.Google Scholar

Paduana-Faedo, L. 1970. ‘L’inversione del rapporto Poeta-Musa nella cultura ellenistica’, ASNP 39: 377–86.Google Scholar

Paduano, G. and Fusillo, M. 1986. Le Argonautiche. Rome.Google Scholar

Parry, A. 1963. ‘The two voices of Virgil’s Aeneid’, Arion 2: 66–80.Google Scholar

Pasquali, G. 1942. ‘Arte allusiva’, Italia chi scrive 11–12: 185–7.Google Scholar

Pearson, L. 1938. ‘Apollonius of Rhodes and the Old Geographers’, AJPh 59: 443–59.Google Scholar

Pearson, L. 1960. The Lost Historians of Alexander the Great. New York.Google Scholar

Pelliccia, H. 1992. ‘Sappho 16, Gorgias’ Helen, and the preface to Herodotus’ Histories’, YClS 29: 63–84.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. 1991. ‘Thucydides’ Archidamus and Herodotus’ Artabanus’, BICS 37: 120–42.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. 1997. ‘East is East and West is West – or are they? National stereotypes in Herodotus’, Histos 1 (internet publication).Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. 2002. ‘Speech and action: Herodotus’ debate on the constitutions’, PCPhS 48: 123–58.Google Scholar

Pelling, C. B. R. 2006. ‘Homer and Herodotus’, in Clarke, M. J., Currie, B. G. F. , Lyne, R. O. A. M. (eds.), Epic Interactions (Oxford): 75–104.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. 1949–53. Callimachus. Vol. 1: Fragmenta, Vol. 2: Hymni et Epigrammata (Oxford).Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, R. 1968. History of Classical Scholarship: From the Beginnings to the End of the Hellenistic Age (Oxford).Google Scholar

Powers, N. 2002. ‘Magic, wonder and scientific explanation in Apollonius, Argonautica 4.1638–93’, PCPhS 48: 87–101.Google Scholar

Pratt, L. 1993. Lying and Poetry from Homer to Pindar: Falsehood and Deception in Archaic Greek Poetics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Priestley, J. 2014. Herodotus and Hellenistic Culture: Literary Studies in the Reception of the Histories. Oxford.Google Scholar

Priestley, J., Zali, V. (eds.), 2016. Brill’s Companion to the Reception of Herodotus in Antiquity and Beyond. Leiden and Boston.Google Scholar

Pritchett, W. K. 1993. The Liar School of Herodotus. Amsterdam.Google Scholar

Pucci, J. 1998. The Full-Knowing Reader. New Haven.Google Scholar

Purves, A. 2010. Space and Time in Ancient Greek Narrative. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Putnam, M. C. J. 1966. The Poetry of the Aeneid. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. 1987. ‘Herodotus, political thought and the meaning of history’, Arethusa 20: 221–48.Google Scholar

Raaflaub, K. 2002. ‘Philosophy, science, politics: Herodotus and the intellectual trends of his time’, in Bakker, E., de Jong, I. J. F., van Wees, H. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Herodotus (Leiden): 149–86.Google Scholar

Redfield, J. 1985. ‘Herodotus the tourist’, CPh 80: 97–118.Google Scholar

Regan, A. 2009. ‘The geography of kingship in Apollonius of Rhodes’, unpublished dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar

Rengakos, A. 1992. ‘Homerische Wörter bei Kallimachos’, ZPE 94: 21–47.Google Scholar

Rengakos, A. 1994. Apollonios Rhodios und die antike Homererklärung. Munich.Google Scholar

Rengakos, A. 2008. ‘Apollonius Rhodius as a Homeric scholar’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 243–66.Google Scholar

Rice, E. 1983. The Grand Procession of Ptolemy Philadelphus. Oxford.Google Scholar

Richardson, S. 1990. The Homeric Narrator. Nashville.Google Scholar

Riemann, K. 1967. ‘Das herodoteische Geschichtswerk in der Antike’, unpublished dissertation, University of Munich.Google Scholar

Robert, L. 1981. ‘Une épigramme satirique d’Automédon et Athènes au début de l’empire’, REG 94: 338–61.Google Scholar

Robinson, D. 1990. ‘Homeric philos: love of life and limbs, and friendship with one’s thumos’, in Craik, E. M. (ed.), Owls to Athens (Oxford): 97–108.Google Scholar

Romm, J. S. 1992. The Edges of the Earth in Ancient Thought. Princeton.Google Scholar

Romm, J. S. 1998. Herodotus. New Haven.Google Scholar

Rood, T. 2006. ‘Herodotus and foreign lands’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 290–305.Google Scholar

Rood, T. 2011. ‘Black Sea variations: Arrian’s Periplus’, CCJ 57: 137–63.Google Scholar

Roy, C. S. 2012. ‘The constitutional debate: Herodotus’ exploration of good government’, Histos 6: 298–320.Google Scholar

Rutherford, R. 2012. ‘Structure and meaning in epic and historiography’, in Foster, E., Lateiner, D. (eds.), Thucydides and Herodotus (Oxford): 13–38.Google Scholar

Sacks, K. 1990. Diodorus Siculus and the First Century. Princeton.Google Scholar

Saïd, S. 2012. ‘Herodotus and the “myth” of the Trojan War’, in Baragwanath, E., de Bakker, M. (eds.), Myth, Truth and Narrative in Herodotus (Oxford): 87–105.Google Scholar

Seaton, R. C. 1912. Apollonius Rhodius: The Argonautica. Cambridge and London.Google Scholar

Schiesaro, A. 1996. ‘Aratus’ myth of Dike’, MD 37: 9–26.Google Scholar

Scholes, R., Kellogg, R. 1966. The Nature of Narrative. Oxford.Google Scholar

Scodel, R. 2002. Listening to Homer: Tradition, Narrative, and Audience. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Scullion, S. 2006. ‘Herodotus and Greek religion’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 192–208.Google Scholar

Selden, D. 1998. ‘Alibis’, Classsical Antiquity 17: 289–412.Google Scholar

Shipley, G. 2000. The Greek World After Alexander, 323–30 BC. London and New York.Google Scholar

Sistakou, E. 2008. ‘Beyond the Argonautica: in search of Apollonius’ ktisis poems’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 311–40.Google Scholar

Sistakou, E. 2009. ‘“Snapshots of myth”: the notion of time in Hellenistic epyllion’, in Grethlein, J., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Narratology and Interpretation: The Content of Narrative Form in Ancient Literature (Berlin and New York): 293–319.Google Scholar

Skinner, J. 2012. The Invention of Greek Ethnography. Oxford.Google Scholar

Smart, J. 2012. ‘Intertextual dynamics in Moschus’ Europa’, Arethusa 45: 43–55.Google Scholar

Smith, R. R. R. 1988. Hellenistic Royal Portraits. Oxford.Google Scholar

Stadter, P. 2012. ‘Thucydides as “reader” of Herodotus’, in Foster, E., Lateiner, D. (eds.), Thucydides and Herodotus (Oxford): 39–66.Google Scholar

Stephens, S. A. 1998. ‘Callimachus at court’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Genre in Hellenistic Poetry (Leuven): 167–85.Google Scholar

Stephens, S. A. 2000. ‘Writing epic in the Ptolemaic court’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Apollonius Rhodius (Leuven): 195–215.Google Scholar

Stephens, S. A. 2003. Seeing Double: Intercultural Poetics in Ptolemaic Alexandria. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Stephens, S. A. 2004. ‘For you, Arsinoe …’, in Acosta-Hughes, B., Kosmetatou, E., Baumbach, M. (eds.), Labored in Papyrus Leaves: Perspectives on an Epigram Collection Attributed to Posidippus (P.Mil.Vogl. VIII 309) (Cambridge): 161–76.Google Scholar

Stephens, S. A. 2005. ‘Battle of the books’, in Gutzwiller, K. (ed.), The New Posidippus: A Hellenistic Poetry Book (Oxford): 229–48.Google Scholar

Stephens, S. A. 2008. ‘Ptolemaic epic’, in Papanghelis, T. D., Rengakos, A. (eds.), Brill’s Companion to Apollonius Rhodius, second edn. (Leiden): 95–114.Google Scholar

Stephens, S. A. 2011. ‘Remapping the Mediterranean: the Argo adventure in Apollonius and Callimachus’, in Obbink, D., Rutherford, R. (eds.), Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons (Oxford): 188–207.Google Scholar

Sternberg, M. 1978. Expositional Modes and Temporal Ordering in Fiction. Bloomington.Google Scholar

Stewart, A. 1993. Faces of Power: Alexander’s Image and Hellenistic Politics. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Stoneman, R. 1991. The Greek Alexander Romance. London.Google Scholar

Strasburger, H. 1982. ‘Herodot als Geschichtsforscher’, in Schmitthenner, W., Zoepffel, R. (eds.), Studien zur alten Geschichte, vol. 2. Hildesheim and New York.Google Scholar

Strootman, R. 2010. ‘Literature and the kings’, in Clauss, J. J., Cuypers, M. (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature (Oxford): 30–45.Google Scholar

Sullivan, S. D. 1980. ‘How a person relates to θυμός in Homer’, IF 85: 138–50.Google Scholar

Swinton, T. C. W. 1976. ‘Si credere dignum est’, PCPhS 22: 60–89.Google Scholar

Tarn, W. 1933. ‘Two notes on Ptolemaic history’, JHS 53: 57–68.Google Scholar

Thalmann, W. G. 2011. Apollonius of Rhodes and the Spaces of Hellenism. Oxford.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. 1986. ‘Virgil’s Georgics and the art of reference’, HSPh 90: 171–98.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. 1990. ‘Ideology, influence, and future studies in the Georgics’, Vergilius 66: 64–70.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. F. 2001. Virgil and the Augustan Reception. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. 1992. Literacy and Orality in Ancient Greece. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. 2000. Herodotus in Context. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Thomas, R. 2006. ‘The intellectual milieu of Herodotus’, in Dewald, C., Marincola, J. (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Herodotus (Cambridge): 60–75.Google Scholar

Tober, D. 2017. ‘Greek local historiography and its audiences’, CQ 67: 460–84.Google Scholar

Toye, D. L. 1995. ‘Dionysius of Halicarnassus on the first Greek historians’, AJPh 116: 279–302.Google Scholar

Trüdinger, K. 1918. ‘Studien zur Geschichte der griechisch-römischen Ethnographie’. Dissertation, Basel.Google Scholar

Tuplin, C. 1993. Failings of Empire: A Reading of Xenophon Hellenica 2.3.11–7.5.27. Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Valverde Sánchez, M. 1989. El aition en las Argonáuticas de Apolonio de Rodas. Murcia.Google Scholar

Van Sickle, J. 1980. ‘The book-roll and some conventions of the poetic book’, Arethusa 13: 5–42.Google Scholar

Vasunia, P. 2001. The Gift of the Nile. Berkeley.Google Scholar

Vian, F. 1970. ‘Notes critiques au chant I des Argonautiques’, REA 72: 80–96.Google Scholar

Vian, F. 1974. Apollonios de Rhodes: Argonautiques, tome I, chants I–II. Paris.Google Scholar

Vian, F. 1980. Apollonios de Rhodes: Argonautiques, tome II, chant III. Paris.Google Scholar

Vian, F. 1981. Apollonios de Rhodes: Argonautiques, tome III, chant IV. Paris.Google Scholar

Walbank, F. 1981. The Hellenistic World. London.Google Scholar

Walbank, F. 1984. ‘Monarchies and monarchic ideas’, CAH² VII.1: 62–100.Google Scholar

Wecowksi, M. 2004. ‘The hedgehog and the fox: form and meaning in the Prologue of Herodotus’, JHS 124: 143–64.Google Scholar

Wendel, C. 1935. Scholia in Apollonium Rhodium vetera. Berlin.Google Scholar

West, M. 2002. ‘“Eumelos”: a Corinthian epic cycle?’, JHS 122: 109–33.Google Scholar

West, S. 2011. ‘The papyri of Herodotus’, in Obbink, D., Rutherford, R. (eds.), Culture in Pieces: Essays on Ancient Texts in Honour of Peter Parsons (Oxford): 69–83.Google Scholar

Whitmarsh, T. 2010. ‘Prose fiction’, in Clauss, J. J., Cuypers, M. (eds.), A Companion to Hellenistic Literature (Oxford): 395–411.Google Scholar

Willcock, M. 1964. ‘Mythological paradeigmata in the Iliad’, CQ 14: 141–54.Google Scholar

Williams, M. 1991. Landscape in the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius. Frankfurt.Google Scholar

Williams, M. 1996. ‘The character of Aeëtes in the Argonautica of Apollonius Rhodius’, Hermes 124: 463–79.Google Scholar

Wright, B. G. 2015. The Letter of Aristeas. Berlin.Google Scholar

Zanker, G. 1987. Realism in Alexandrian Poetry. London.Google Scholar

Zanker, G. 1998. ‘The concept and use of genre-marking in Hellenistic epic and fine art’, in Harder, M. A., Regtuit, R. F., Wakker, G. C. (eds.), Genre in Hellenistic Poetry (Leuven): 225–38.Google Scholar

Ziegler, K. 1966. Das hellenistische Epos, second edn. Leipzig.Google Scholar

Zyroff, E. S. 1971. ‘The author’s apostrophe in epic from Homer through Lucan’, unpublished dissertation, Johns Hopkins University.Google Scholar