Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-14T06:49:25.566Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A la Carte Multilateralism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2015

Get access

Summary

A la carte suggests the idea of picking and choosing. The term a la carte multilateralism was coined by Richard Haass, Director of Policy Planning in the U.S. State Department from 2001 to 2003. In a speech in July 2001, Haass told a Washington think-tank that “what you're going to get from [the George W. Bush] administration is a la carte multilateralism… we'll look at each agreement and make a decision, rather than come out with a broad-based approach.”

Haass' use of the term came against a backdrop of debate about the Bush administration's supposed preference for unilateral action, signalled by its rejection of the Kyoto Protocol, the International Criminal Court and the Anti-Ballistic Missile (ABM) Treaty. According to one analyst the formulation was intended to suggest that “multilateralism was not rejected out of hand, but would be engaged only as and when the United States chooses to participate”. Treaties will “be judged one issue at a time, one negotiation at a time, one summit meeting at a time”. As such, the term clearly shares much with ideas like “ad hoc multilateralism” or “coalitions of the willing” in which one leading state creates a multilateral group by “picking and choosing its allies and mechanisms as circumstances dictate”.

Advocates of an a la carte approach argue that it is realistic and pragmatic. Rather than accepting multilateralism as an end in itself, a la carte multilateralism puts emphasis on achieving outcomes. Satu Limaye has said the Bush administration's approach more closely resembles “accountable multilateralism” in which “a premium is placed on making institutions achieve concrete ends”. Robert Kagan agrees, arguing that, “contrary to fashionable wisdom, the debate today is not between multilateralism and unilateralism. It's between effective multilateralism and paralytic multilateralism”. John Bolton, then U.S. Under-Secretary of State for international security affairs, explicitly links the efficacy of a la carte multilateralism to its ability to serve the national interest.

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: ISEAS–Yusof Ishak Institute
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×