Book contents
- Before Anarchy
- Before Anarchy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Part I Hobbesian Variations
- Part II Hobbesian Receptions
- 5 Pufendorf’s Anti-Hobbesian Camouflage
- 6 Pufendorf’s International Thought
- 7 Rousseau and the Quest for Peace
- 8 Vattel the Sorry Comforter
- Epilogue: Globalizing Political Thought
- Index
- References
5 - Pufendorf’s Anti-Hobbesian Camouflage
from Part II - Hobbesian Receptions
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 January 2016
Book contents
- Before Anarchy
- Before Anarchy
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Book part
- Part I Hobbesian Variations
- Part II Hobbesian Receptions
- 5 Pufendorf’s Anti-Hobbesian Camouflage
- 6 Pufendorf’s International Thought
- 7 Rousseau and the Quest for Peace
- 8 Vattel the Sorry Comforter
- Epilogue: Globalizing Political Thought
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Before AnarchyHobbes and his Critics in Modern International Thought, pp. 143 - 174Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2016
References
Albee, Ernest (1895). “The Ethical System of Richard Cumberland,” The Philosophical Review 4, pp. 264–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alberti, Valentin (1676). Compendium Juris Naturae, Orthodoxae Theologiae Conformatum, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Behme, Thomas (1995). Samuel von Pufendorf: Naturrecht und Staat: Eine Analyse und Interpretation seiner Theorie, ihrer Grundlagen und Probleme, Göttingen.Google Scholar
Bowle, John (1969). Hobbes and His Critics: A Study in Seventeenth-Century Constitutionalism, London.Google Scholar
Carmichael, Gershom (2002). “Supplements and Observations upon Samuel Pufendorf’s On the Duty of Man and Citizen [Edinburgh, 1724],” in Moore, James and Silverthorne, Michael (eds.), The Writings of Gershom Carmichael, Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Carr, Craig and Seidler, Michael (1996). “Pufendorf, Sociality and the Modern State,” History of Political Thought 17, pp. 352–378.Google Scholar
Cumberland, Richard (1672). A Philosophical Inquiry into the Laws of Nature, in Which Their Form, Chief Heads, Order, Promulgation, and Obligation, Are Deduced from the Nature of Things: Also the Elements of Mr. Hobbes’s Philosophy, as well Moral as Civil, Are Considered and Refuted, London.Google Scholar
Dufour, Alfred (1991). “Pufendorf,” in Burns, E.H. and Goldie, Mark (eds.), Cambridge History of Political Thought, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Eulau, Heinz (1941). “Theories of Federalism under the Holy Roman Empire,” The American Political Science Review 35, pp. 643–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, Edward (1969). “Memoirs,” in Bonnard, Georges (ed.), Edward Gibbon: Memoirs of My Life, New York.Google Scholar
Gierke, Otto (1966). Johannes Althusius und die Entwicklung Naturrechtlichen Staatstheorien [1880], trans. Freyd, Bernard, The Development of Political Theory, New York.Google Scholar
Gigas, Emil (1897). Briefe Samuel Pufendorfs an Christian Thomasius, 1687–1693, München und Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldie, Mark (1991). “The Reception of Hobbes,” in Burns, E.H. and Goldie, Mark (eds.), Cambridge History of Political Thought, Cambridge, pp. 589–615.Google Scholar
Goyard-Fabre, Simone (1989). “Pufendorf, adversaire de Hobbes,” Hobbes Studies 2, pp. 65–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gross, Hanns (1996). “Review of The Morality of the Fallen Man: Samuel Pufendorf on Natural Law by Kari Saastamoinen,” The American Historical Review 101, pp. 1184–1185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haakonssen, Knud (2000). “The Character and Obligation of Natural Law According to Richard Cumberland,” in Stewart, M.A. (ed.), English Philosophy in the Age of Locke, Oxford.Google Scholar
Haslam, Jonathan (2002). No Virtue Like Necessity: Realist Thought in International Relations since Machiavelli, Yale.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas (1998). On the Citizen, ed. Tuck, Richard and Silverthorne, Michael, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hochstrasser, Timothy (1993). “Conscience and Reason: The Natural Law Theory of Jean Barbeyrac,” The Historical Journal 36, pp. 289–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hochstrasser, Timothy (2000). Natural Law Theories in the Early Enlightenment, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hont, Istvan (1986). “The Language of Sociability and Commerce: Samuel Pufendorf and the Theoretical Foundations of the ‘Four-Stages’ Theory,” in Pagden, Anthony (ed.), Languages of Political Theory in Early Modern Europe, Cambridge, pp. 253–276.Google Scholar
Hont, Istvan (2005). Jealousy of Trade: International Competition and the Nation-State in Historical Perspective, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Hufeland, Gottlieb (1790). Lehrsätze des Naturrechts und der damit Verbundenen Wissenschaften zu Vorlesungen, Jena.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian (2001). Rival Enlightenments: Civil and Metaphysical Philosophy in Early Modern Germany, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Ian (2004). “Conflicting Obligations: Pufendorf, Leibniz and Barbeyrac on Civil Authority,” History of Political Thought 25, pp. 670–699.Google Scholar
Hunter, Ian (2007). The Secularization of the Confessional State: The Political Thought of Christian Thomasius, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutcheson, Francis (2002). An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections, with Illustrations on the Moral Sense [1728], Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Kratochwil, Friedrich (1982). “On the Notion of ‘Interest’ in International Relations,” International Organization 36, pp. 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Leonard (1960). “History and Law in the Seventeenth Century: Pufendorf,” Journal of the History of Ideas 21, pp. 198–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krieger, Leonard (1965). The Politics of Discretion: Pufendorf and the Acceptance of Natural Law, Chicago.Google Scholar
Leibniz, Gottfried (1972). “Opinion on the Principles of Pufendorf” [1706], in Riley, Patrick (ed.), Leibniz: Political Writings, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Leira, Halvard (2007). “At the Crossroads: Justus Lipsius and the Early Modern Development of International Law,” Leiden Journal of International Law 20, pp. 65–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandeville, Bernard (1924). The Fable of the Bees: Or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits [1729], in Kaye, F.B. (ed.), vol. II, Part II, Fourth Dialgoue, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mautner, Thomas (1996). “Carmichael and Barbeyrac: The Lost Correspondence,” in Palladini, Fiammetta and Hartung, Gerald, Samuel Pufendorf und die Europäische Frühaufklärung, Berlin.Google Scholar
Mautner, Thomas (2004). “Review of Ed. FiammettaPalladini, Samuel Pufendorf: Gesammelte Werke, vol. V (Berlin: Akedemie Verlag, 1997),” British Journal for the History of Philosophy 12:3, pp. 540–543.Google Scholar
Meinecke, Friedrich (1957). “Die Idee der Staaträson in der Neueren Geschichte [Munich, 1924],” trans. Stark, Werner, Machiavellism: The Doctrine of Raison d’état and Its Place in Modern History, New Brunswick, NJ.Google Scholar
Niedermann, Joseph (1941). Kultur: Werden und Wandlungen des Begriffs und seiner Ersatzbegriffe von Cicero bis Herder, Florence.Google Scholar
Osler, Margaret (1991). Atoms, Pneuma, and Tranquility: Epicurean and Stoic Themes in European Thought, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pacchi, Arrigo (1978). “Hobbese l’epicureismo,” Revista Critica di Storia della Filosofia 33, pp. 54–71.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta (1990). Samuel Pufendorf Discepolo di Hobbes: Per una Reinterpretazione del Giusnaturalismo Moderno, Bologna.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta (1995). “Translating Samuel Pufendorf. On Two New English Editions,” History of Political Thought 16, pp. 121–132.Google Scholar
Palladini, Fiammetta (1999). La Biblioteca di Samuel Pufendorf: catalogo dell’asta di Berlin del septembre 1697, Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Parkin, Jon (1999). Science, Religion, and Politics in Restoration England: Richard Cumberland’s De Legibus Naturae, London.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1931). “Elementorum Jurisprudentiae Universalis Libri Duo [1660],” in Scott, James Brown (ed.), The Classics of International Law, trans. Oldfather, William Abbott, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1934). “De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo [1688],” in Scott, James Brown (ed.), The Classics of International Law, trans. Oldfather, William Abbott, Oxford.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1990). De Statu Hominum Naturali [Samuel Pufendorf’s On the Natural State of Men, the 1678 Latin Edition and English Translation, ed. Seidler, Michael, Lewiston, NY.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1991). On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law [1673], ed. Tully, James, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1997a). “De Officii [1673],” in Hartung, Gerald (ed.), Samuel Pufendorf: Gesammelte Werke, Berlin.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (1997b). “Specimen Controversiarum, Published Together with His Other Polemical Works under Eris Scandica [1678],” in Palladini, Fiammetta (ed.), Samuel Pufendorf: Gesammelte Werke, Berlin.Google Scholar
Pufendorf, Samuel (2003). “De Officii [1673],” in Hunter, Ian and Saunders, David (eds.), The Whole Duty of Man, According to the Law of Nature, trans. Tooke, Andrew [1735], Indianapolis.Google Scholar
Riley, Patrick (1973a). “Review of Moral Philosophie und Naturrecht bei Samuel Pufendorf by Horst Denzer,” The American Political Science Review 67:4, pp. 1353–1355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riley, Patrick (1973b). “The Origins of Federal Theory in International Relations Ideas,” Polity 6, pp. 87–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saunders, David and Hunter, Ian (2003). “Bringing the State to England: Andrew Tooke’s Translation of Samuel Pufendorf’s De Officio Hominis et Civis,” History of Political Thought 24, pp. 218–234.Google Scholar
Saunders, David and Hunter, Ian (2003). “The Natural Jurisprudence of Jean Barbeyrac: Translation as an Art of Political Adjustment,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 36, pp. 473–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schieder, Wolfgang (1972). “Sozialismus in Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe,” in Bruner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart (eds.), Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur Politisch-Sozialen Sprache in Deutschland, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Schneewind, J.B. (1987). “Pufendorf’s Place in the History of Ethics,” Synthese 72, pp. 123–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skinner, Quentin (2002). Vision of Politics: Hobbes and Civil Science, vol. III, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Smith, Adam (1982). Jurisprudence or Notes from the Lectures on Justice, Police, Revenue, and Arms delivered in the University of Glasgow [1766], in Meek, R.L., Raphael, D.D., Stein, P.G., and Smith, Adam (eds.), Lectures on Jurisprudence, Indianapolis.Google ScholarPubMed
Stintzing, Roderich (1880). Geschichte der Deutschen Rechtswissenschaft, München and Leipzig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Titius, Gottlieb Gerhard (1703). Observationes in Samuelis L.B. de Pufendorf De Officio Hominis et Civis Juxta Legem Naturalem Libros Duos, Leipzig.Google Scholar
Tuck, Richard (1979). Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development, Cambridge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tully, James (1991). Pufendorf: On the Dity of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Welzel, Hans (1986). Die Socialitas als Oberstes Naturrechtslehre Samuel Pufendorfs, Berlin, New York.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wokler, Robert (1994). “Rousseau’s Pufendorf: Natural Law and the Foundations of Commercial Society,” History of Political Thought 15:3, pp. 373–402.Google Scholar