Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T18:34:28.952Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - Integrated Pest Management (IPM) in Fruit Orchards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2010

Heikki M. T. Hokkanen
Affiliation:
University of Helsinki
James M. Lynch
Affiliation:
University of Surrey
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The agro-ecosystems in Fennoscandia are characterized by relatively few and moderate plant protection problems. The number of pests and plant diseases is smaller than in warmer regions. Due to a shorter growing season and lower temperatures, many multivoltine insects develop only one generation a year. The beneficial fauna, primarily the many predaceous bugs (anthocorids and mirids) and mites (phytoseiids), have also proved to be highly efficient as control measures.

Pest control systems have been developed for several agricultural crops, which require minimum inputs of pesticides. The programmes for many greenhouse cultures, based on biocontrol, and those for fruit crops, using integrated approaches, have been especially successful.

Development of IPM in Norwegian fruit orchards

In the 1950s and early 1960s a spray programme that consisted of 6–8 annual applications was commonly used against insects and mites. This heavy routine spray programme was expensive and caused undesirable environmental impact.

An extensive research programme on IPM, which started in the 1960s, provided important information on the biology and ecology of major pests and their natural enemies. Based on this new knowledge, the use of pesticides could be reduced. By 1974, farmers who had adopted IPM in their orchards, used only 0–3 pesticide applications a year without significant damage to the crop (Edland, 1989a). During recent years, common use of scab-warning devices has resulted in further reduction of spray programmes. Thus, in 1988 the average use of insecticides and acaricides was 1.1 sprays and of fungicides 3.5 sprays, for the whole season in many orchards (Edland, 19896). This is less than 20% of what is being used in integrated fruit production in some other European countries (Prinoth, 1990).

Type
Chapter
Information
Biological Control
Benefits and Risks
, pp. 44 - 50
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×