Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T18:51:25.894Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

29 - Alterations in the gene expression of aneuploid oocytes and associated cumulus cells

from Section 5 - Pathology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 October 2013

Dagan Wells
Affiliation:
Nuield Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Institute of Reproductive Sciences, Oxford, UK
Alan Trounson
Affiliation:
California Institute for Regenerative Medicine
Roger Gosden
Affiliation:
Center for Reproductive Medicine and Infertility, Cornell University, New York
Ursula Eichenlaub-Ritter
Affiliation:
Universität Bielefeld, Germany
Get access

Summary

The importance of aneuploidy in human reproductive failure

Human reproduction is a remarkably inefficient process. On average, fertile couples attempting to conceive only succeed in achieving a clinical pregnancy one month out of every five. For infertile patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) pregnancy rates are similarly low. More than 80% of the embryos transferred to the uterus during IVF treatment fail to implant and two-thirds of cycles do not produce a child [1]. As a result, most IVF patients require two or more rounds of treatment to achieve a pregnancy. There are many potential reasons why an embryo might not establish a pregnancy; however, it is clear that one of the most important is chromosome abnormality. This is particularly true for embryos derived from women of advanced reproductive age. While it is not unusual for half of the blastocyst stage embryos produced by women in their early thirties to be chromosomally abnormal, this figure increases dramatically with age, such that an aneuploidy rate exceeding 75% is typical for blastocysts from women over the age of 40 [2]. The high prevalence of aneuploidy, coupled with its detrimental impact on development, explains the majority of embryo implantation failures and miscarriages. Evidence for the lethality of aneuploidy comes from the detection of chromosome imbalances in the majority of miscarriages [3, 4] and from blinded studies where embryos, later revealed to be chromosomally abnormal, had been transferred to patients [5].

Type
Chapter
Information
Biology and Pathology of the Oocyte
Role in Fertility, Medicine and Nuclear Reprograming
, pp. 346 - 352
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kovalevsky, G, Patrizio, P.High rates of embryo wastage with the use of assisted reproductive technology: trends between 1995 and 2001 in the United States. Fertil Steril 2005; 84: 325–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fragouli, E, Wells, D.Aneuploidy in the human blastocyst. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011; 133(2–4): 149–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Menasha, J, Levy, B, Hirschhorn, K, et al. Incidence and spectrum of chromosome abnormalities in spontaneous abortions: new insights from a 12-year study. Genet Med 2005; 7: 251–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassold, T, Chen, N, Funkhouser, J, et al A cytogenetic study of 1000 spontaneous abortions. Ann Hum Genet 1980; 44(Pt 2): 151–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, RT Jr, Ferry, K, Su, J, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening is highly predictive of the reproductive potential of human embryos: a prospective, blinded, nonselection study. Fertil Steril 2012; 97: 870–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fragouli, E, Wells, D, Delhanty, JD.Chromosome abnormalities in the human oocyte. Cytogenet Genome Res 2011; 133(2–4): 107–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fragouli, E, Alfarawati, S, Goodall, NN, et al. The cytogenetics of polar bodies: insights into female meiosis and the diagnosis of aneuploidy. Mol Hum Reprod. 2011; 17(5): 286–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Handyside, AH, Montag, M, Magli, MC, et al. Multiple meiotic errors caused by predivision of chromatids in women of advanced maternal age undergoing in vitro fertilisation. Eur J Hum Genet 2012; 20: 742–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fishel, S, Gordon, A, Lynch, C, et al. Live birth after polar body array comparative genomic hybridization prediction of embryo ploidy-the future of IVF?Fertil Steril 2010; 93: 1006.e7–10.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gabriel, AS, Thornhill, AR, Ottolini, CS, et al. Array comparative genomic hybridisation on first polar bodies suggests that non-disjunction is not the predominant mechanism leading to aneuploidy in humans. J Med Genet 2011; 48: 433–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fragouli, E, Katz-Jaffe, M, Alfarawati, S, et al. Comprehensive chromosome screening of polar bodies and blastocysts from couples experiencing repeated implantation failure. Fertil Steril 2010; 94: 875–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geraedts, J, Montag, M, Magli, MC, et al. Polar body array CGH for prediction of the status of the corresponding oocyte. Part I: clinical results. Hum Reprod 2011; 26: 3173–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, GM, Cram, DS, Song, B, et al. Gene expression profiling of human oocytes following in vivo or in vitro maturation. Hum Reprod 2008; 23: 1138–44.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fragouli, E, Bianchi, V, Patrizio, P, et al. Transcriptomic profiling of human oocytes: association of meiotic aneuploidy and altered oocyte gene expression. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16: 570–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grøndahl, ML, Yding, Andersen C, Bogstad, J, et al. Gene expression profiles of single human mature oocytes in relation to age. Hum Reprod 2010; 25: 957–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, JR, Dumesic, DA, Abbott, DH, et al. Molecular abnormalities in oocytes from women with polycystic ovary syndrome revealed by microarray analysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007; 92: 705–13.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Voet, M, Berends, CWH, Perreault, A, et al. NuMA-related LIN-5, ASPM-1, calmodulin and dynein promote meiotic spindle rotation independently of cortical LIN-5/GPR/Ga. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11: 269–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manning, AL, Ganem, N, Bakhoum, SF, et al. The kinesin-13 proteins Kif2a, Kif2b, and Kif2c/MCAK have distinct roles during mitosis in human cells. Mol Biol Cell 2007; 18: 2970–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakhoum, SF, Thompson, SL, Manning, AL, et al. Genome stability is ensured by temporal control of kinetochore-microtubule dynamics. Nat Cell Biol 2009; 11: 27–35.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glessner Bradfield, JP, Wang, K, et al. A genome-wide study reveals copy number variants exclusive to childhood obesity cases. Am J Hum Genet 2010; 87(5): 661–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, F, Kaplitt, MG. Novel mitochondrial substrates of OMI indicate a new regulatory role in neurodegenerative disorders. PLoS One 2009; 18: e7100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, MT, Freeman, EA, Gardner, DK, et al. Oxidative metabolism of pyruvate is required for meiotic maturation of murine oocytes in vivo. Biol Reprod 2007; 77: 2–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gohil, VM, Greenberg, ML. Mitochondrial membrane biogenesis: phospholipids and proteins go hand in hand. J Cell Biol 2009; 184: 469–72.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mathew, R, Kongara, S, Beaudoin, B, et al. Autophagy suppresses tumour progression by limiting chromosomal instability. Genes Dev 2007; 21: 1367–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geng, J, Klionsky, DJ.The Atg8 and Atg12 ubiquitin-like conjugation systems in macroautophagy. EMBO Rep 2008; 9: 859–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Steuerwald, N, Cohen, J, Herrera, RJ, et al. Association between spindle assembly checkpoint expression and maternal age in human oocytes. Mol Hum Reprod 2001; 7: 49–55.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Patrizio, P, Fragouli, E, Bianchi, V, et al. Molecular methods for selection of the ideal oocyte. Reprod Biomed Online 2007; 15: 346–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eppig, JJ, Chesnel, F, Hirao, Y, et al. Oocyte control of granulosa cell development: how and why. Hum Reprod 1997; 12: 127–32.Google ScholarPubMed
Eppig, JJ,Wigglesworth, K, Pendola, FL. The mammalian oocyte orchestrates the rate of ovarian follicular development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002; 99: 2890–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Assou, S, Anahory, T, Pantesco, V, et al. The human cumulus–oocyte complex gene-expression profile. Hum Reprod 2006; 21: 1705–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feuerstein, P, Cadoret, V, Dalbies-Tran, R, et al. Gene expression in human cumulus cells: one approach to oocyte competence. Hum Reprod 2007; 22: 3069–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutton-McDowall, ML, Gilchrist, RB, Thompson, JG.The pivotal role of glucose metabolism in determining oocyte developmental competence. Reproduction 2010; 139: 685–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, Z, Wells, D.The human oocyte and cumulus cells relationship: new insights from the cumulus cell transcriptome. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16: 715–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilchrist, RB, Lane, M, Thompson, JG.Oocyte-secreted factors: regulators of cumulus cell function and oocyte quality. Hum Reprod Update 2008; 14: 159–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Su, YQ, Sugiura, K, Wigglesworth, K, et al. Oocyte regulation of metabolic cooperativity between mouse cumulus cells and oocytes: BMP15 and GDF9 control cholesterol biosynthesis in cumulus cells. Development 2008; 135: 111–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Assou, S, Haouzi, D, Mahmoud, K, et al. A non-invasive test for assessing embryo potential by gene expression profiles of human cumulus cells: a proof of concept study. Mol Hum Reprod 2008; 14(12): 711–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Assou, S, Haouzi, D, De, Vos J, et al. Human cumulus cells as biomarkers for embryo and pregnancy outcomes. Mol Hum Reprod 2010; 16(8): 531–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gebhardt, KM, Feil, DK, Dunning, KR, et al. Human cumulus cell gene expression as a biomarker of pregnancy outcome after single embryo transfer. Fertil Steril 2011; 96: 47–52.e2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ouandaogo, ZG, Haouzi, D, Assou, S, et al. Human cumulus cells molecular signature in relation to oocyte nuclear maturity stage. PLoS One 2011; 6: e27179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fragouli, E, Wells, D, Iager, AE, et al. Alteration of gene expression in human cumulus cells as a potential indicator of oocyte aneuploidy. Hum Reprod 2012; 27: 2559–68.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuang, Z, Lewis, RS, Curtis, JM, et al. The SPRY domain-containing SOCS box protein SPSB2 targets iNOS for proteasomal degradation. J Cell Biol 2010; 190: 129–41.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, JH, Kang, Y, Khare, V, et al. The p53-inducible gene 3 (PIG3) contributes to early cellular response to DNA damage. Oncogene 2010; 29: 1431–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Høst, E, Gabrielsen, A, Lindenberg, S, et al. Apoptosis in human cumulus cells in relation to zona pellucida thickness variation, maturation stage, and cleavage of the corresponding oocyte after intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Fertil Steril 2002; 77: 511–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×