Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-68945f75b7-zpsnj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-05T17:26:50.323Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - The body as an archaeological resource

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Joanna R. Sofaer
Affiliation:
University of Southampton
Get access

Summary

we continually walk a fine line between constructivism and the claim to authenticity made by bodily phenomena.

Benthien 2002: 12

The body is a major class of archaeological evidence and a vital archaeological resource. From the moment of its discovery, the body forms a focus for analysis as it is excavated, photographed, drawn, described, lifted and finally removed, often to a laboratory for osteological examination. Bodies may be recorded separately from other finds on individual skeleton recording sheets (Museum of London Archaeology Service 1994; Parker Pearson 1999a), emphasising their privileged interpretative position. The single body is often taken as the basic unit of analysis in the mortuary domain (Chapman 2000: 174). Indeed, one measure of the importance of the body is that mortuary contexts are lent their classifications and denotation as ‘mortuary’ through the presence of a body.

Bodies have been studied in terms of their placement and arrangement, often by reference to orientation and position, with differences between bodies interpreted in terms of the categorisation of past individuals or social groups (e.g. Pader 1982; Lucy 2000). The treatment of the dead body and choice of means of its disposal, whether through cremation, inhumation, or its disarticulation and disaggregation, has been identified as a strong social statement and as a metaphor for social organisation (Parker Pearson 1999a). More recently, the deliberate fragmentation of bodies has been seen in terms of the enchainment of people and artefacts with a series of scales in the relationship between linked body parts of a single individual, groups of related whole bodies and sets of artefacts (Chapman 1999, 2000).

Type
Chapter
Information
The Body as Material Culture
A Theoretical Osteoarchaeology
, pp. 12 - 30
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×